Now on ScienceBlogs: The death of Tetrapod Zoology

Enter to Win

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other. Mostly regarding climate change, though.

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

"There is no need to sally forth, for it remains true that those things which make us human are, curiously enough, always close at hand. Resolve, then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving, and tiny blasts of tinny trumpets, we have met the enemy, and not only may he be ours, he may be us."
--Walt Kelly

« No time to be timid | Main | Why do I bother? »

Carbon capture made easy

Category: climate
Posted on: November 11, 2008 7:13 AM, by James Hrynyshyn

ResearchBlogging.orgThere's talk of "a low-cost, safe, and permanent method to capture and store atmospheric CO2." All it would take is some conventional rock drilling and a little energy in the form of warm water. That's what the authors of a new paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences say is theoretically possible thanks to natural weathering processes at work in the Sultanate of Oman. It's geo-engineering for those who don't much like geo-engineering!

"In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage" appears this week in PNAS. The authors, Peter B. Kelemen and Jurg Matter of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory enthusiastically describe the potential of a great mass of common rock called peridotite in Oman. The stuff is everywhere in the Earth's mantle, actually. It's just that in Oman it's right on the surface, sucking up carbon dioxide through a natural weathering process that's been responsible for removing CO2 from the air for billions of years at a relatively leisurely rate.

But what if we could accelerate the process? Kelemen and Matter estimate that some well-placed bore holes and pressurized water containing some of that troublesome CO2 could just do the trick. In fact, they use their paper to:

show that under certain circumstances exothermic peridotite alteration (serpentinization, carbonation) can sustain high temperature and rapid reaction with carbonation up to 1 million times faster than natural rates, potentially consuming billions of tons of atmospheric CO2 per year.
As we're pouring about 30 billion tons of CO2 into the air every year, it would be most convenient if there was an easy way to remove a gigaton or two, wouldn't it? So just how much could that Omani peridotite absorb? Our authors fudge that a bit, talking about a solution that offers the potential to suck up a quarter of all the gas in the air now — equivalent to everything we've emitted since we started burning fossil fuels — and making a somewhat more fanciful reference to a theoretical maximum of 77 trillion tonnes, which is 25 times as much as what's in air now.

That, of course, would be a bad idea, as it's CO2 that keeps the planet warm enough for life. But the great thing about this particular form of geo-engineering (and it literally is rock-changing), is that we could easily turn on and turn off the switch, unlike so many other wild schemes, like seeding the oceans with iron.

But back to what's practically possible. Again, though the has plenty of calculations, Kelemen and Matter don't offer a single number. They write that the natural weathering process absorbs 10,000 to 100,000 tons a year, and that it should be possible to increase that rate by a factor of a million. That would imply a potential of at least 10 billion tons a year. But the abstract mentions ">1 billion tons of
CO2 per year" and in an interview with Reuters, they are more conservative, offering something like a total of 2 billion tons/yr. That and "more research needs to be done before [it] could be used on a commercial scale."

The Reuters piece notes that the authors have "a preliminary patent filing for the technique." There's clearly a lot of work to done before they get rich off that patent, but there's no reason not to wish them luck, and maybe send a few research dollars their way. The Omani peridotite isn't the only formation on Earth that offers such an opportunity. If this thing works, we just might be able to take care of a significant fraction of the CO2 problem. Not all of it, by any means, but enough to buy us some time as we make the shift to the post-fossil-fuel society. As Kelemen and Matter write in the obligatory "more research is needed" closing:

Such processes are all-but-impossible to simulate in the laboratory. Large-scale field tests should be conducted...
-- P. B. Kelemen, J. Matter (2008). In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805794105


Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/85496

Comments

1

It almost sounds too good to be true, so I am asking: How much energy is needed for that process? And in case we do not really want to deal with Oman or need a backup, where else do we have access to peridotite?

Posted by: oku | November 11, 2008 2:00 PM

2

I haven't gone to the original source as you did, but the review I saw made a big deal about the deposit being near major Gulf oil and gas consumption sites. It gave me the impression, that one had to pipe concentrated CO2 to the drill sites, i.e. that functionally it was just another geological disposal site/method to append onto carbon capture. Of course free air capture, ought to be the holy grail here.

I have several times asked about the potential effect on weathering CO2 absorption rates if only say mechanical breakup, and perhaps a little bit of spreading out was done to the right sorts of deposits. Would it be possible to just break up some rocks, and spread them out over the desert surface, letting rain and time do the weathering for us? Or would the increase in absorption be too small to matter?

Posted by: bigTom | November 11, 2008 5:53 PM

3

oku: From the paper:

Similarly large ophiolites are in Papua New Guinea (≈200 × 50 km in area), New Caledonia (≈150 × 40 km), and along the east coast of the Adriatic Sea (several ≈100 × 40 km massifs).

bigTom: natural weathering operates on a very long time scale -- millions of years. Which is why this paper discusses a process involving accelerating the same chemical reactions by a factor of a million. We'd have to spread rocks on an area larger than the surface of the earth to see enough carbon uptake to make a difference.

Posted by: James Hrynyshyn | November 12, 2008 3:41 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.