Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Laelaps

Musings on evolution, the fossil record, and our place in nature

Profile

melittle.jpg Laelaps is the blog of freelance science writer Brian Switek. This blog frequently features his musings on paleontology, evolution, and the history of science. Switek also blogs for Smithsonian magazine's Dinosaur Tracking, and he is a research associate at the New Jersey State Museum.


Switek's first book, Written in Stone, will be published on November 1, 2010 by Bellevue Literary Press.

Facebook
Twitter

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Paleo

Zoology

Ecology

History of Science

Geology

Miscellany

Fellow Sciblings

« Photo of the Day #547: Giant panda | Main | Two new blogs join the borg »

Another cool Cambrian critter

Category: EvolutionInvertsPaleontology
Posted on: April 10, 2009 10:05 AM, by Brian Switek


An artist's restoration of Hurdia. From the Science paper.

ResearchBlogging.orgIt is not easy working on Cambrian fossils. The petrified treasures are found in only a few places in the world, and even though many exhibit exquisite preservation they come from a time when life on earth would have looked very unfamiliar. One such creature, Anomalocaris, was a three foot long invertebrate that swam by undulating a series of lobes on either side of its body. In front of its mouth were two spiked tendrils that may have helped situate prey items to be processed by its conveyor belt of crushing plates that was its mouth. There is nothing quite like it alive today.

Indeed, Anomalocaris was so unusual that it was misidentified multiple times. Parts of it were taken as representing jellyfish, crustaceans, or other strange Cambrian creatures. Now we known differently, but similar problems still affect other Cambrian fossils. In the book Wonderful Life the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould wrote that "Three genera (Hurdia, Tuzoia, and Carnarvonia) are bivalved arthropod carapaces with no soft parts preserved; they cannot be properly allocated to any arthropod subgroup, and remain unclassified today." Twenty years later Tuzoia and Carnarvonia remain mysterious, but in the journal Science a team a researchers has just revealed a new identity for Hurdia.

Admittedly I am a little late to the game on this one (see what others have had to say at Ediacaran, The Dragon's Tales, and Deep Sea News), but it is hard to resist talking about such a strange creature. It has a story as complex as, and entwined with, that of Anomalocaris.

As Allison Daley and colleagues note, Hurdia has had a complex history. Parts of it were identified as belonging to jellyfish and various hard-shelled invertebrates, but during the major revisions that occurred during the 1980's these parts were assigned to two particular genera: Anomalocaris and Laggania. This placed the pieces of Hurdia in the right ballpark, but it was not until the 1990's that Desmond Collins saw that Hurdia deserved its own genus designation. A reinvestigation of the material relating to all three genera has supported this conclusion and given us an image of a creature even stranger than Anomalocaris.

Generally speaking Hurdia looked a lot like Anomalocaris. Being close relatives they shared a common body plan with anterior tendrils, stalked eyes, and a trash-compactor-of-doom type mouth. A major feature that made Hurdia distinct, though, was a large head shield that stuck out in front of its eyes. These shields were a little over three inches long, making up for about half the body length of the entire animal.


The systematic placement of Hurdia. From the Science paper.

Hurdia has also provided increased insight into the place of creatures like Anomalocaris among invertebrates. Together Hurdia, Anomalocaris, and Laggania belong to a group called Radiodonta, and this group is placed close to the Euarthropoda, or "true" arthropods like trilobites. This makes the members of the Radiodonta very significant to questions of arthropod origins, and the recent discovery of another Anomalocaris-relative called Schinderhannes has provided researchers with even more material to investigate. These creatures were strange enough to start with, but with each new discovery they seem get a little bit stranger.

Daley, A., Budd, G., Caron, J., Edgecombe, G., & Collins, D. (2009). The Burgess Shale Anomalocaridid Hurdia and Its Significance for Early Euarthropod Evolution Science, 323 (5921), 1597-1600 DOI: 10.1126/science.1169514

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/106207

Comments

1

Ah, another drawing by the estimable Marianne Collins. If there are better drawings of this sort of beastie, I haven't seen them.

Posted by: Scott Belyea | April 10, 2009 12:39 PM

2

"I can only imagine that the name of Carnarvonia has changed as that genus name is also used for a flowering plant"
There are other generic names that are used for completely different organisms. If you check out damp waste ground in the UK, for example, you may see both Prunella vulgaris (a plant) and Prunella modularis (a bird).

Thanks for the information about Hurdia.

Posted by: Richard Simons | April 10, 2009 1:27 PM

3

Richard; Thank you for the reminder. I had forgotten that there can be overlap for generic names between plants and animals.

Posted by: Laelaps | April 10, 2009 1:31 PM

4

It's because these creatures are so removed from any life forms now that they're so fascinating; they truly do look like creatures from another planet. I'm glad yet another one was added to the menagerie!

Posted by: Raymond Minton | April 10, 2009 2:26 PM

5

I love it. What's awesome is that I didn't realize that anomalocarids were so diverse.

Posted by: Zach Miller | April 10, 2009 5:13 PM

6

The head looks like a plow with a channel underneath to force things toward the tendrils. It would seem like it fed on things it found in the mud. Yum.

Posted by: jck | April 10, 2009 6:11 PM

7

The codes that govern nomenclature in zoology (ICZN) and plants (ICBN) are non-overlapping, and noncoordinated, and thus any number of genera can (and do) exist between the two codes with the same name. If, in a world where these independant codes are dropped in favor of a single, universal code for nomenclature in all organisms, this comparability would need to be discarded. So, anyways, no name needs replacement because a plant also shares that name.

Posted by: Jaime A. Headden | April 11, 2009 5:48 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.