Laelaps

i-6be4ff84158c073863b43eb228897014-800px-Namibie_Etosha_Leopard_01edit-thumb-500x332-44274.jpg

A leopard (Panthera pardus). Image from Wikipedia.

ResearchBlogging.org

When a leopard eats a baboon, what is left behind? This question is not only relevant to primatologists and zoologists. Even though instances of predation on humans is relatively rare, big cats still kill and consume people, and when they do they can virtually obliterate a body. Yet, just like a human criminal, the dining habits of big cats leave tell-tale clues, and in 2004 researchers Travis Pickering and Kristian Carlson fed two captive leopards eight complete baboon carcasses each in order catalog the most useful ways to identify the victim of a big cat kill.

This experimental design is a classic. Way back in 1822, when the English geologist William Buckland was studying Kirkdale Cave in North Yorkshire, he was able to determine that the site was a hyena den by comparing the gnawed bones from the cave to the bones given to living hyenas at a zoo. In the case of Pickering and Carlson, though, the scientists were after more delicate details. Specifically, they wanted to know which bones regularly turned up as refuse (bits and pieces which were strewn about during feeding) and which commonly came out in vomit or scat. If certain bones are more likely to turn up as refuse or scat, then forensic investigators can direct their attention to certain aspects of a cat kill to glean the most information about the victim’s identity.

As expected, the researchers saw a pattern emerge when what was left of the baboons was recovered from the cats. Parts of the upper spine, shoulderblades, hips, and limb bones were most frequently found in the refuse assemblages, while parts of the mid- to lower-spine, hands, and feet were found in the scat. This latter finding was particularly significant. The leopards typically proceeded to eat the hands and feet of the baboons by eating one joint at a time. This means that the relatively small finger and toe bones wound up in the scat nearly intact, oftentimes with some soft tissues attached, and so when a human is killed by a big cat it would be wise for investigators to pick through any scat they find in the hope of finding part of a finger or toe with enough flesh still on it to provide a fingerprint.

As the authors suggest, it seems that scat has greater potential to help investigators identify the victim of a big cat than the scattered remains in the refuse collections. The only exception to this may be teeth, which would be found in the collection of non-digested bones since leopards did not consume the skulls of the baboons (and hence would probably be unlikely to attempt eating human heads). Equipped with this background information, forensic scientists will hopefully be better able to analyze big cat kills.

Yet the benefits of such studies extend beyond forensic science. Leopards and other big cats have been hunting primates, including hominins, for millions of years, and the patterns identified by Pickering and Carlson will help paleontologists identify bones accumulated by carnivores in the fossil record. In fact, many famous fossil human specimens, from the Homo erectus of Dragon Bone Hill in China to Orrorin from Kenya, show signs that they were collected by the activities of carnivores. Odd as it may seem, the dining habits of carnivores may have allowed for the preservation of numerous fossil humans.

For more on carnivore-primate interactions, see my posts on tamarin-hunting margays and why leopards prefer big monkey which travel in groups.

PICKERING, T., & CARLSON, K. (2004). Baboon taphonomy and its relevance to the investigation of large felid involvement in human forensic cases Forensic Science International, 144 (1), 37-44 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.003

Comments

  1. #1 Mike Olson
    April 8, 2010

    Okay, that was bizarrely, insanely cool….I’m just glad there was no film…:D

  2. #2 Anthea Fleming
    April 8, 2010

    Very interesting post – Felines were not the only predators primates have had to fear; I believe the damage to the Taung child’s skull shows it had been dropped by a large eagle or other raptor.
    About Buckland’s experiment with hyenas – there was no such thing as the Exeter Zoo in 1822, though this error has been much copied in works of reference. He found his hyenas at the Exeter Change Menagerie in the Strand, London. It was kept by Edward Cross from 1773 to 1829, and was a two or three storey building full of cages and enclosures, all far too small and smelly by modern standards. It even included an elephant, which had to be destroyed in 1826; subsequently its skeleton was shown in the pen it had tried to break out of. The menagerie probably closed after the opening of the ‘Zoological Gardens’ in Regents Park, which opened in 1828 and must have been pleasanter to visit.

    Thankyou for your blog – I never miss it.

  3. #3 Brian Switek
    April 8, 2010

    Thank you very much for the correction, Anthea. I have amended the post, and I am certainly thankful for the details!

  4. #4 Scarina
    June 7, 2010

    That was insanely, creepily interesting.
    @ Anthea: Yup, I read in The Greatest Show on Earth by Dawkins that scratch marks around Taung Child’s eye sockets indicate that it was caught by an eagle.

  5. #5 Monado
    June 7, 2010

    I recall seeing on television a pair of lions presented with mannequins that had been arranged about a “stalled” car. They liked the opportunity, came up behind, and bit at the small of the back.

  6. #6 Monado
    June 7, 2010

    Oh, prehistoric hyenas. I thought you were writing about extant, feral or escaped hyenas in 1822. Whew!

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.