The Loom
A blog about life, past and future
Profile
Carl Zimmer is a science writer. PLEASE VISIT THE LOOM AT ITS NEW HOME.
Books by Carl Zimmer
"Essential reading"--Publisher's Weekly
Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life
Charles Darwin's The Descent of Man: The Concise Edition
"As fine a book as one will find on the subject."-- Scientific American
Revised with a new introduction
"Superb...a non-stop delight."-- New Scientist
"Fascinating...thrilling... Zimmer has produced a top-notch work of popular science." --LA Times
"A fascinating story, which Zimmer unfolds as a tale of high-stakes scientific sleuthing...thanks to marvelous lucid writing." --Booklist
Assorted Links
Swatches from the Loom
- The Wisdom of Parasites
- Eyes Part One: Opening Up the Russian Doll
- Hamilton's Fall
- Old Hands and New Fins
- The Origin of the Ridiculous
Search
Recent Posts
- The Loom Ends. The Loom Lives!
- The News Can Wait
- Almost Ready...
- Some News...
- A Tapeworm Mystery: Which Way Is Up?
- Microcosm in tomorrow's New York Times Book Review
- A Talk With Paul Ehrlich About The State of the World
- Nice and Weird: Dispatches from The Depths of Parasitology
- The Ten-Mile-Wide Bullet
- Reminder: I'm talking tonight in Los Angeles
Science Tattoo Emporium
Recent Comments
- Harlan on Some News...
- hardindr on Some News...
- Bob O'H on Some News...
- Neerali on A Tapeworm Mystery: Which Way Is Up?
- Michael Balter on Microcosm in tomorrow's New York Times Book Review
- Owlmirror on Of Bacteria and Throw Pillows
- Bishop Pontoppodan on Of Bacteria and Throw Pillows
- themadlolscientist on A Tapeworm Mystery: Which Way Is Up?
- Pteryxx on Nice and Weird: Dispatches from The Depths of Parasitology
- Pteryxx on Of Bacteria and Throw Pillows
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
Data
The Original Home of the Giant Flatulent Raccoon
Why the Loom?
"...among the joyous, heartless, ever-juvenile eternities, Pip saw the multitudinous, God-omnipresent, coral insects, that out of the firmament of waters, heaved the colossal orbs. He saw God's foot upon the treadle of the loom, and spoke it; and therefore his shipmates called him mad."
--Moby Dick
The Loom has moved! Make sure to update your bookmarks and feed readers.
« What to do after you lose your job at NASA | Main | Movie Night »
DailyKos Interview
Category: General
Posted on: February 11, 2006 9:17 AM, by Carl Zimmer
TrackBacks
-
science in the United States from Science Library Pad
Currently in the US everything is political, and politics is currently intertwined with religion. It's hard to separate out science. Here is a grab-bag of items: * Time cover story Is America Flunking Science? Are We Losing Our Edge? February Read More
Tracked on February 12, 2006 2:09 PM









Comments
I followed the links in Darksyde's DKos Main Page post. It looks like I might have been the first but I will likely NOT be the last.
A couple of questions, please?
1) Are you considering coming to Yearly Kos? I'd like to get a book signed if you do.
2) Darksyde writes of his concern that right-wing political animals have been 'editing' education. Do you agree? Please amplify.
Thanks,
LL
Posted by: LeftyLimblog | February 11, 2006 9:28 AM
LL--
1. Can't make it. FYI, I keep a list of my upcoming talks here. And I keep meaning to look into how to get autographs to people. I know other authors have various systems, but don't know the details.
2. As for editing education, just take a look at Kansas, where the supernatural is now fair game for scientific inquiry. Sign me up for astrology class!
Posted by: Carl Zimmer | February 11, 2006 9:48 AM
I got here by way of daily Kos. Greatly enjoyed the interview.
I was a bit taken aback by Bush's proposal in the State of the Union to increase the number of AP courses in math and science.
The last place I would look for leadership in Science Education is the Bush White House. The proposal itself seems progressive and innocuous. But it had a funny taste. Two days later the NYTimes rain a terrible article praising the AP process.
Turns out, the Times article was a rahash of a press release by College Board, the company that runs the AP exams and gets paid $80 per student.
Could the AP proposal be more Bush sleaze, a way to get money to business friends? It may be worth keeping an eye open and doing some spade work.
The question of whether the 50 year old AP movement has produced results is an interesting one. I spent an evening doing some googling and was not impressed, but the data seem weak. Certainly, no one would seriously argue that the 50 year history of the AP movement has been accompanied by a parallel increase in high school quality and scientific literacy.
I don't think much of the AP system and I think its the wrong way to promote science and science literacy -- but that's another topic.
Posted by: John Kubie | February 11, 2006 12:06 PM
Thanks for your fascination and your ablity and willingness to tell us about the wonders you find.
Here's something you might not have heard of that could give you a thrill. It's a current look into whale evolution, especially the progression of Orcinus orca to symbol use and cultural faculties. You can find it at:
http://www.orcanetwork.org/nathist/symbolsshort.html
Posted by: Howard Garrett | February 11, 2006 12:53 PM
I just wanted to say thank you for your hard work and thoughtful essays. I've really enjoyed reading your blog. What topics would you like to explore more in the future?
Posted by: Luke ~ | February 11, 2006 12:59 PM
OK, we really DON'T NEED a bunch of new people from DailyKos crowding in here. A couple of months ago The Loom hit the half million visitor mark. In that short period it has gone up nearly another quarter million. It's jam packed in here. I can hardly breath. There were friggin' 200 comments last week on a post about a cockroach getting stung. I'm outta here. I need fresh air.
Posted by: john | February 11, 2006 2:47 PM
Carl,
First, I want to thank you for a terrific blog. I came across it doing some research for a debate on a web forum over creationism vs evolution. I found answers here, but more than that, was inspired all over again by the incredible discoveries in science. Your recent post on the wasp parasitoid was chilling and amazing.
I have one question, that has come up in the debate I'm involved in--
Why does DNA mutate?
My opponent is suggesting the traditional creationist argument that "Mutation is so rare it could only have been done by a Higher Power". I've used logic and common sense to show how even if we don't know why something happens NOW, it's simply something that's worth investigating now and in the future, to learn why.
My opponent suggests that science has absolutely no idea why DNA mutates, that experimentation has been done on it and they still are completely unable to discover why it happens.
I was just curious, what's the current scientific thought on why DNA mutates in the first place? Do we know?
Thanks,
Jeff
Posted by: Jeff Coleman | February 11, 2006 7:17 PM
Jeff, IANAB (I Am Not A Biologist), but basically, DNA goes to great lengths _not_ to mutate; that it happens anyway is due to the general contrariness of the universe. Nothing is perfect. You get copying errors, background radiation breaking stuff unexpectedly, a virus interfering with the process and botching it - the list of reasons is wrong.
It's the same reason stuff breaks in general - there's many more ways for things to go wrong than right, and sooner or later it's going to bite you.
Posted by: Janne | February 12, 2006 3:06 AM