All I want for Christmas is a lying frog and a bubble-sniffing mole.
For those who want to head for the original papers, check out:
1. "Why Animals Lie: How Dishonesty and Belief Can Coexist in a Signaling System" (free full text)
2. "Underwater 'sniffing' by semi-aquatic mammals"
Happy Holidays!
UPDATE 12/26: Forgot to mention yesterday that I also talk about the dishonesty article on this week's edition of the Times Science podcast.
- Log in to post comments
Unrelated, but your friend Toxoplasma gondii pops up again at http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20975555-1702,00.html
When will we see a male only cure?
Carl wrote:
" 'One of the things I would guess right off the bat is that there's some sort of carefully controlled valve to keep it from inspiring water,' Dr. Catania said. 'The timing and the behavior is probably carefully controlled as well. But the evolution of these minor adaptations does not seem to be a huge leap.' "
Minor adaptations?
ROFLMAO!!!!! Once again, ideology trumps science.
Is there no limit to the human mind's ability to deceive itself?
Hey Carl - Happy New Year!
Enjoyed the lying frog and it brought to mind my favorite deceptive bug, the Photuris firefly, which does the "mating blink" of a different genus of firefly in order to attract and then eat the males.
Cheers,
Stan
The article is interesting, but I'm put off by the gratuitous political swipe in the illustration (not that Carl necessarily had anything to do with it). Is putting Clinton in with Nixon supposed to be some kind of "balance"? Sorry, Clinton is not in the same world of deception as Nixon, Iago, Machiavelli, or Clifford Irving. Unlike Nixon, or Bush for that matter, his lies weren't in the service of killing people.
Sorry, to be clear: I mean the first article, as it appeared in print.