Seed Media Group

The Loom

A blog about life, past and future

Profile

Zimmer133.jpg Carl Zimmer is a science writer. PLEASE VISIT THE LOOM AT ITS NEW HOME.

Books by Carl Zimmer

Microcosom150.jpg

"Essential reading"--Publisher's Weekly
Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life



ConciseDescent150.jpg

Charles Darwin's The Descent of Man: The Concise Edition



paperback%20sidebar.jpg

"As fine a book as one will find on the subject."-- Scientific American

Revised with a new introduction





PRex150.jpg

"Superb...a non-stop delight."-- New Scientist





soul150.jpg

"Fascinating...thrilling... Zimmer has produced a top-notch work of popular science." --LA Times





Water%27s%20Edge%20150.jpg

"A fascinating story, which Zimmer unfolds as a tale of high-stakes scientific sleuthing...thanks to marvelous lucid writing." --Booklist





Human%20evo%20150.jpg





Assorted Links

Swatches from the Loom

Search this blog

Recent Posts

Science Tattoo Emporium

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Archives

Data

The Original Home of the Giant Flatulent Raccoon

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

Why the Loom?

"...among the joyous, heartless, ever-juvenile eternities, Pip saw the multitudinous, God-omnipresent, coral insects, that out of the firmament of waters, heaved the colossal orbs. He saw God's foot upon the treadle of the loom, and spoke it; and therefore his shipmates called him mad."
--Moby Dick

The Loom has moved! Make sure to update your bookmarks and feed readers.

« Hopeless Monsters--A Guest Post from Dr. Jerry Coyne | Main | Science Tattoo Friday: The Scientific Revolution in Pictures »

Once Again, Breathe Into This Paper Bag

Category: Writing Elsewhere
Posted on: January 25, 2008 10:57 AM, by Carl Zimmer

So the news came out yesterday that Craig Venter's crew has now synthesized an entire microbe's genome from scratch. This does not send a chill down my spine. Does that mean I'm missing a piece of my brain? Judge for yourself, in my new commentary for Wired. (Also, check out Rob Carlson's typically clear-eyed assessment.)

Comments

#1

I agree with you 100%. That is exactly how I feel about it, the difference being that you can actually put it in words just right...

Posted by: Coturnix | January 25, 2008 11:24 AM

#2

I'm likely missing something in the article, but hasn't Venters project already taught us a few new things? For instance, that E. coli could only partially assemble the Mycoplasma genome but that a yeast can go the whole distance is, to me, an interesting tidbit that bears further examination.

And by stripping out genes and coming up with a bare-bones minimum for a living thing, at least in the future, don't we learn something new about the minimum genomic requirements for a viable cell and, in the process, gain an understanding of what the currently functionally unassigned genes do?

What makes this development interesting in my eyes isn't just what's been accomplished technically but the opportunities it opens up.

Posted by: Mike O'Risal | January 25, 2008 1:15 PM

#3

I wasn't as excited about this development as I might have been 10 years ago. Am I expecting too much from science these days? Have I just gotten used to reading about daily advancements? Or am I just impatient in waiting for cures for diseases or the solving of global problems?

Shauna

Posted by: Shauna MacKinnon | January 26, 2008 6:07 AM

#4

Excellent analysis, Carl. Just one more example of how the popular media often conflates, confuses, and basically muddies up the clear waters of science. I'm thankful for science writers like you, being on the spot with commentary that can put things in perspective, so that intelligent laypeople and scientists in other fields (redundent, I suppose) can keep up with what is really happening out there in sci-land. I know this is going to generate lots of discussion in genetics classes this semester, and as I'm lecturing on "genomics" myself in a few weeks, I think I'll quote your commentary as an example of "good" science writing/reporting.

Posted by: Mike D. | January 27, 2008 1:42 AM

#5

I couldn't agree more with your analysis and other people's comments too.

I loved your analogy with gene cut&paste... that's how i started out programming too, by looking inside other people's code and cutting and pasting my way into it...

One day, Craig or some other human will figure out how to write a "Hello World!" genome completely of its own.

Posted by: luca | January 31, 2008 7:31 AM

#6

kagtı poşet kutu etiket ajanda pvc poşet karton çanta imalat
paper bags paper gift bags paper boxes
label date books note books promotion bags
manufacture

Posted by: akademikspack | June 15, 2008 1:12 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. The Wall Street Journal editorial pages are a very silly place 11.21.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Casey Luskin writes a revealing letter 11.22.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. KKK Flyer in Michigan 11.22.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Quadrant's war on science 11.21.2008 · Tim Lambert
  5. Stupid legislature tricks: Tennessee 11.20.2008 · revere

Search All Blogs