More than a few blogs have discussed the kerfuffle over the Australian fashion designer who had a runway show with women who were not emaciated. Not much to add, but I came across this survey of 100 models at Fashion Week. What shocked me weren’t the eating habits, but their ages:
14-15 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
16-17 . . . . . . . . . . . 2618-19 . . . . . . . . . . . 41
20-21 . . . . . . . . . . .24
Over 22 . . . . . . . . . . 4
That’s right, 31% were younger than 18 (paging John Derbyshire…). Only 4% were over 21. What’s even worse than the emaciation fetish (although that’s pretty dreadful), is the obsession with age. Twenty-two isn’t ‘too old.’ And based on no evidence whatsoever other than my personal experience, I think this ‘reverse ageism’ affects women far more than men: few think a man in his 30s is ‘old’, but far more think a women in her 30s is old.
The only saving grace is that the number one downside to being a model was “dirty old men”…