Mike the Mad Biologist

One topic that I don’t discuss enough is the role that the agricultural use of antibiotics plays in the evolution (and ecology) of antibiotic resistance. A recent review in Clinical Microbiology and Infection describes how the illegal use of nitrofuran antibiotics in Portugese agriculture led to an increase in highly virulent Salmonella.

What are nitrofurans? There are several different nitrofuran antibiotics (furazolidone, nitrofurazone, and nitrofurantoin), but the one drug some readers might have heard of (or taken) is nitrofurantoin, which is used to treat urinary tract infections, in part, because these strains have evolved resistance to other antibiotics. Nitrofurantoin typically is not the first drug used to treat urinary tract infections because there can be complications from long-term nitrofurantoin use. It also makes your pee orange–this, in and of itself, has no health consequences other than upsetting the Mighty Pee Gods.

By 1995, the European Union had banned the use of nitrofuran antibiotics in agriculture because they can elevate the risk of cancer (these antibiotics kill bacteria by damaging bacterial DNA once the bacterium inadvertently changed these antibiotics into DNA damaging forms). Because these antibiotics don’t break down very quickly, they are deemed a health hazard. In 2002, the U.S. banned all uses of nitrofuran antibiotics in agriculture.

In 2002-2003, there was an ‘outbreak’ of illegal nitrofuran antibiotic use in Portugese poultry farming. Decreased susceptibility of Salmonella to nitrofurantoin skyrocketed to 65% of all Salmonella isolates, and the prevalence in food animals of S. Enteriditis serogroup D* isolates also increased (these particular salmonellae are very effective at causing disease in humans). Also, the frequency of nitrofurantoin resistance was indistinguishable between hospital isolates and poultry, while Samonella from other sources had much lower frequencies of resistance.

There was an added ‘bonus’: nitrofurantoin resistant Salmonella were more likely to be resistant to other antibiotics too. One thing to keep in mind is that Salmonella are the tip of the iceberg. Just like cefquinome use, the real concern should be the evolution of resistant–in this case, nitrofurantoin resistant–E. coli. Think of it all microbial ‘collateral damage.’

For those of you keeping score at home, E. coli results in about 70% of all urinary tract infections, and, in the U.S., kills around 9,000 people/year due to urinary tract infections gone horribly wrong. Remember what I said the primary use of nitrofurantoin in human medicine is: treating urinary tract infections.

This is one more reason why using these antibiotics responsibly is so critical in preserving the power of these literally life-saving drugs.

*No, I didn’t screw up the italicizing or capitalization. Salmonella taxonomy is a pandimensional clusterfuck.

Comments

  1. #1 Dixon Ng
    November 27, 2006

    Hi,

    Interesting post. I recently watched a documentary on the local Korean network (it had English subtitles) about the mis-use of antibiotics in chicken and swine feed. Apparently the differences are quite drastic when the farmstock are not treated w/ antibiotics in their feed – ie. loss in weight, longer time to gain enough weight for sale, high susceptibility to diseases – and these can translate into high costs for the farmers. I think they made a comparison in the video that some farm feed in Korea contain 16x and 6x more antibiotic ingredients than those used in Denmark and Japan, respectively.

  2. #2 Steven
    November 28, 2006

    My friend has a salmonella infection for the past 3-4 weeks and he was really ill. He says hes not eating eggs and chicken anytime soon lol.

  3. #3 Mike the Mad Biologist
    November 28, 2006

    Dixon,

    You’re right in that antibiotics used as growth promoters can increase animal weight yields. I would argue, however, that the healthcare system should not have to subsidize the costs of producing a ‘cheaper chicken.’ Regarding Denmark, they have eliminated antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture, and are still competitive internationally (one reason is that they also have a low level of Salmonella contamination due to a government program to reduce Salmonella prevalence; ~60% in 1990 to < 5% in 2002).

  4. #4 fred
    October 15, 2007

    am i the only one looking for answers…where can i blog to see what others are facing do to peanut butter recall ..ye thus getting the germ inside of me and suffering still …with all kind of recurring and feels like not treatment is being delayed by doctors also .scince feb 07..ive been lung fluid build up infection….in lung .. breathing ..problems still,,ect….ect…ect..plz help

  5. #5 mirc
    March 26, 2009

    thanks

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!