Mike the Mad Biologist

Battle of the Iraqi Contractors

It’s sad that the only way oversight can occur in our Excellent Iraqi Adventure is when one sleazebag contractor rats out another sleazebag contractor (italics mine):

A toughly worded cable sent from the embassy to State Department headquarters on May 29 highlights a cascade of building and safety blunders in a new facility to house the security guards protecting the embassy. The guards’ base, which remains unopened today, is just a small part of a $592 million project to build the largest U.S. embassy in the world.

The main builder of the sprawling, 21-building embassy is First Kuwaiti General Trade and Contracting Co., a Middle Eastern firm that is already under Justice Department scrutiny over alleged labor abuses. First Kuwaiti also erected the guard base, prompting some State Department officials in Washington and Baghdad to worry that the problems exposed in the camp suggest trouble lurking ahead for the rest of the embassy complex.

The first signs of trouble, according to the cable, emerged when the kitchen staff tried to cook the inaugural meal in the new guard base on May 15. Some appliances did not work. Workers began to get electric shocks. Then a burning smell enveloped the kitchen as the wiring began to melt.

All the food from the old guard camp — a collection of tents — had been carted to the new facility, in the expectation that the 1,200 guards would begin moving in the next day. But according to the cable, the electrical meltdown was just the first problem in a series of construction mistakes that soon left the base uninhabitable, including wiring problems, fuel leaks and noxious fumes in the sleeping trailers.

“Poor quality construction . . . life safety issues . . . left [the embassy] with no recourse but to shut the camp down, in spite of the blistering heat in Baghdad,” the May 29 cable informed Washington.

Such challenges with construction contracts inside the fortified enclave known as the Green Zone reflect the broader problems that have thwarted reconstruction efforts throughout war-torn Iraq.

The “fairly serious problems” noted in the cable indicate that First Kuwaiti’s work fails to meet basic safety standards, said an administration official who was not authorized to speak to the news media. But the State Department’s Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), which oversees construction of the new embassy, has kept a “close hold” on the project, making it difficult for anyone else in the government to gauge progress. “We are suspecting we will find the same issues in the new embassy,” resulting in months of delays, the official said.

The embassy cable prompted a stinging response from James L. Golden, OBO’s managing director for the embassy project…. he berated personnel in Baghdad for sending their message over an open embassy system, rather than keeping the complaints in-house. He defended First Kuwaiti and accused the embassy and KBR — a Texas-based company that runs many facilities in Iraq and discovered the wiring problems — of making false claims to deflect attention from their own errors.

The guard base “has been constructed to the approved design specifications,” Golden wrote, adding that “none of the issues raised in the cable has merit” and that “it appears [the embassy] and KBR simply do not want to operate the camp for other reasons.”

KBR said its concerns were justified. “Safety remains KBR’s top priority,” said Heather L. Browne, the firm’s director of corporate communications. “Our initial assessments determined that the issues identified were not linked to KBR’s work and in fact inspection reports from the [State Department] confirm that KBR was not responsible for the safety issues identified.”

….But the problems mounted. The 252 prefabricated residential trailers, with either two or three rooms each, filled with formaldehyde fumes. The trailer manufacturer, a Saudi company called Red Sea Housing Services Co., confirmed to the embassy it had used the toxic chemical in preparing the housing. Red Sea told the embassy to keep the windows open and use charcoal in the rooms to absorb the odor, but “the fumes are still prevalent,” the cable said….

OBO unexpectedly informed the embassy that it would soon stop maintaining the power stations and water-treatment facilities at the new guard base. The embassy protested that it had limited staff to operate the equipment, which needs to be in operation constantly to avoid costly repairs. First Kuwaiti provided only “minimal spare parts” for the power generators and “less than minimal spare parts” for the water-treatment plant, the cable said.

Finally, on May 25, a KBR hazardous-materials expert discovered that all 10 generators had developed leaks. The fuel tanks were installed without corrosion protection or leak detectors, and fuel had begun to saturate the soil around the tanks. The cable said that Teflon tape designed for water pipes had been used on the fuel tanks, and that such tape “will dissolve on contact with diesel fuel.” KBR refused to operate the power generators unless its liability was waived.

Over five years, and the Bush Administration still can’t exercise competent oversight. Maybe if the Iraq embassy had asked for a commutation things would have worked out better….

Comments

  1. #1 blf
    July 5, 2007

    Apparently Bush & Co sometimes don’t even bother with pretending to get something for the money. An old story, but still mind-boggling, How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish:

    The US flew nearly $12bn in shrink-wrapped $100 bills into Iraq, then distributed the cash with no proper control over who was receiving it and how it was being spent.

    Asked what had happened to the $8.8bn [ Paul Bremer’s finanical advisor (retired Admiral David Oliver) ] replied: “I have no idea. I can’t tell you whether or not the money went to the right things or didn’t – nor do I actually think it’s important.”
    Q: “But the fact is billions of dollars have disappeared without trace.”
    Oliver: “Of their [(Iraq’s)] money [(from the Development Fund for Iraq)]. Billions of dollars of their money, yeah I understand. I’m saying what difference does it make?”

  2. #2 Tony P
    July 5, 2007

    This is disgraceful. But in this case it’s Halliburton’s KBR subsidiary bitching which is extremely interesting.

    Lets face it, the Bush administration is about nothing if not transfering wealth from people to corporations. Of course corporations are owned by people in the guise of share holders.

    In essence it’s the abolishment of the middle class.

  3. #3 Dunc
    July 6, 2007

    And if that’s what’s happening in the Green Zone, how do you think reconstruction is going in the rest of the country?

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.