Mike the Mad Biologist

Say hello to the Office on National Drug Control Policy and to faith-based drug overdose prevention. One public health intervention that saves lives is the distribution of Narcan nasal sprays to drug users:

The nasal spray is a drug called naloxone, or Narcan. It blocks the brain receptors that heroin activates, instantly reversing an overdose.

Doctors and emergency medical technicians have used Narcan for years in hospitals and ambulances. But it doesn’t require much training because it’s impossible to overdose on Narcan.

The Cambridge program began putting Narcan kits into drug users’ hands in August. Since then, the kits have been used to reverse seven overdoses.

New data compiled for NPR by researcher Alex Kral of the consulting firm RTI International show that more than 2,600 overdoses have been reversed in 16 programs operating across the nation.

Fewer dead people good. Yes. Maybe not?

But Dr. Bertha Madras, deputy director of the White House Office on National Drug Control Policy, opposes the use of Narcan in overdose-rescue programs.

“First of all, I don’t agree with giving an opioid antidote to non-medical professionals. That’s No. 1,” she says. “I just don’t think that’s good public health policy.”

Madras says drug users aren’t likely to be competent to deal with an overdose emergency. More importantly, she says, Narcan kits may actually encourage drug abusers to keep using heroin because they know overdosing isn’t as likely.

Madras says the rescue programs might take away the drug user’s motivation to get into detoxification and drug treatment.

“Sometimes having an overdose, being in an emergency room, having that contact with a health care professional is enough to make a person snap into the reality of the situation and snap into having someone give them services,” Madras says.

Because bringing addicts to the break of death is a really good public health policy. Of course, Madras doesn’t have any actual data to support her claim–think of it as faith-based addiction policy. As long as werightwing fucknozzles view drug addiction primarily as a moral problem, and not a health problem, we will be faced with this kind of stupidity.

And desperate people won’t get the help they need to stay alive.

(HT: Mark Kleiman)

Comments

  1. #1 PalMD
    January 28, 2008

    While they’re at it, why doesn’t the gov’t randomly distribute AIDS-infected needles, just to teach those scum-bags a lesson.

  2. #2 phisrow
    January 28, 2008

    Didn’t this exact argument come out when the HPV vaccine was introduced?

    Now, if we were to respin the program as a cheap method to keep addicts out of the ER and on the street where they belong, rather than as a program to save lives, I suspect we might find a bit more support from the sin-and-death crowd.

  3. #3 Badger3k
    January 28, 2008

    The whole Faith-Based thing depends on fear. Fear of damnation, fear of HPV, fear of oversdosing.

  4. #4 Dave Briggs
    January 29, 2008

    You certainly did a good job of presenting both sides! I agree with your ideas but I also can follow the logic of hers. This may be an issue that needs further publication so that the public can decide. I think they would land on our side!
    Dave Briggs :~)

  5. #5 Robster, FCD
    January 31, 2008

    The ONDCP is a huge mess right now. The current person in charge has been pushing money away from prevention programs that have potential and putting them in programs that are known not to work. Prove the ONDCP doesn’t work, cut its funding, put the money towards programs that excite the republican voter base, i.e. more border patrols.

  6. #6 geciktiriciler
    February 21, 2009
  7. #7 sex shop
    March 27, 2009

    thanks for all

  8. #8 şişme bebek
    June 8, 2009

    You certainly did a good job of presenting both sides! I agree with your ideas but I also can follow the logic of hers. This may be an issue that needs further publication so that the public can decide. I think they would land on our side!

  9. #9 erotik shop
    June 18, 2009

    You certainly did a good job of presenting both sides! I agree with your ideas but I also can follow the logic of hers. This may be an issue that needs further publication so that the public can decide. I think they would land on our side

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!