Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Mike the Mad Biologist

Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology

Search

Profile

ntm4-30-7 Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology. Comment policy: say what you want, but back it up with an email address. I don't like anonymous trolls.

Follow mikethemadbiol on Twitter

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Science Links

« Push 'Focus-Grouping'? | Main | Creationism and Goldberg's Liberal Fascism: One and the Same »

'Defending' Freedom Isn't Free, Particularly When Wiretappers Don't Pay Their Bills

Posted on: January 11, 2008 8:37 AM, by Mike

The sound you're hearing is the heads of everyone who cares about civil liberties going BOOM! According to the AP, the telephone companies cut off the FISA wiretap programs when they weren't paid on time:

Telephone companies have cut off FBI wiretaps used to eavesdrop on suspected criminals because of the bureau's repeated failures to pay phone bills on time.

A Justice Department audit released Thursday blamed the lost connections on the FBI's lax oversight of money used in undercover investigations. In one office alone, unpaid costs for wiretaps from one phone company totaled $66,000.

In at least one case, a wiretap used in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act investigation ''was halted due to untimely payment,'' the audit found. FISA wiretaps are used in the government's most sensitive and secretive criminal and intelligence investigations, and allow eavesdropping on suspected terrorists or spies.

''We also found that late payments have resulted in telecommunications carriers actually disconnecting phone lines established to deliver surveillance results to the FBI, resulting in lost evidence,'' according to the audit by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine.

More than half of 990 bills to pay for telecommunication surveillance in five unidentified FBI field offices were not paid on time, the report shows.

When if came to illegal, non-FISA wiretaps, the telcos argued that they had to wiretap because the Preznit asked them too, and that it was their patriotic duty to do so. Erm, not so much:

''It seems the telecoms, who are claiming they were just being 'good patriots' when they allowed the government to spy on us without warrants, are more than willing to pull the plug on national security investigations when the government falls behind on its bills,'' said former FBI agent Michael German, the ACLU's national security policy counsel. ''To put it bluntly, it sounds as though the telecoms believe it when the FBI says the warrant is in the mail but not when they say the check is in the mail.''

I guess 'freedom' isn't free after all...

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/61009

Comments

1

Well, patriotism and fighting terrorists is great and all, but when we're talking about money, we're talking about the really serious stuff.

Posted by: Mark P | January 11, 2008 10:20 AM

2

I guess 'freedom' isn't free after all...

I read this on a bumper sticker. I guess it applies to more things than I thought! :~)
Dave Briggs :~)

Posted by: Dave Briggs | January 11, 2008 11:37 AM

3

Wait, wait. This raises a really important question.

Are the telecoms being paid for the warrantless wiretapping program, too?

If so, doesn't that significantly change the legal aspects of what the telecoms did? I.E. doing something illegal because the government asked you to, versus doing something illegal because you were paid?

Posted by: Coin | January 11, 2008 1:54 PM

4

While I agree this undermines the whole "we did it for the government!" defense, I am stunned that this administration isn't arguing that they don't HAVE to pay.

Posted by: The Ridger | January 11, 2008 11:48 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.