Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab PSA

Seed Media Group

Mike the Mad Biologist

Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology

Search

Profile

ntm4-30-7 Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology. Comment policy: say what you want, but back it up with an email address. I don't like anonymous trolls.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Science Links

« Clough: Good News for the Smithsonian | Main | The Brain of McCain Fails Mainly on Spain »

Abortion and the Swing Vote That Shall Not Be Named

Posted on: September 19, 2008 10:51 AM, by Mike

If you ever needed evidence for the idea that voters are not rational but rationalizing, this NY Times story about the role abortion might play in Pennsylvania is a clear example (italics mine):

One parishioner ruled out voting for Mr. Obama explicitly because he is black. "Are they going to make it the Black House?" Ray McCormick asked, to embarrassed hushing from a half dozen others gathered around the rectory kitchen. (Five of the six, all lifelong Democrats who supported Mrs. Clinton in the primary, said they now lean toward Mr. McCain.)

Mr. Madonna, the political scientist, said of the Catholic vote in white, working-class Scranton, "This is a tough area for Obama and some of it is race."

Senator Clinton is as every bit pro-choice as Obama--more so, actually. Nonetheless, Clinton's stand on abortion wasn't troubling whereas Obama's very similar--and arguably, more conservative--is a problem.

I wonder why that is.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/81491

Comments

1

Some? HAHAHAHAAH! There are ZERO issues of importance in which the Clinton stance is more similar to the McCain stance than to the Obama position. Except if your issue is skin reflectance, of course.

Posted by: DrugMonkey | September 19, 2008 12:15 PM

2

Lets not forget that large percentage (last heard 10%?) that still insist Obama is a Muslim. This is in spite of a large scandal about his Christian minister and McCain condemning such attacks.

I have to give credit to the recent Republican presidential campaign efforts in having a firm understanding of what lies people want to believe. They provide great fodder for people in denial, or people who want to be in denial but aren't quite there yet.

Posted by: Scott Conger | September 19, 2008 12:26 PM

3

Rick Perlstein points out that the premise of the NYT article is nonsnese:

In 2004 voters were queried, "Would you support or oppose the Catholic Church denying communion to Catholic politicians who are in favor of legal abortion?" Among the general public—Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Hindus, Zoarastrians, Wiccans, heathens like me, et al—68 percent were opposed to the idea of the Church denying communion over abortion. What were the numbers among Catholic respondents? 72 percent and 22 percent. Catholics are more likely to be offended by the Catholic hierarchy inserting itself into this political issue than the general public as a whole.

Posted by: QrazyQat | September 19, 2008 9:05 PM

4

sex shop

Posted by: sex shop | August 3, 2009 6:29 AM

5

biber hapı

Posted by: biber hapı | August 16, 2009 8:52 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM