Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Mike the Mad Biologist

Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology

Search

Profile

ntm4-30-7 Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology. Comment policy: say what you want, but back it up with an email address. I don't like anonymous trolls.

Follow mikethemadbiol on Twitter

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Science Links

« Obama and Self-Inflicted Negotiation: More of the Same? | Main | Puzzling Gallup Poll on Internet Use »

Bush, OSHA, TB, and the Need for a Universal Healthcare System

Category: Healthcare
Posted on: January 6, 2009 10:09 AM, by Mike

While others have commented on the gross ineptitude of OSHA, which is charged with worker safety, during the reign of Little Lord Pontchartrain, one point that wasn't raised is that the OSHA fiasco also shows why we need universal healthcare that has government insurance, not private. From the Washington Post article:

Among the regulations proposed by OSHA's staff but scuttled by political appointees was one meant to protect health workers from tuberculosis. Although OSHA concluded in 1997 that the regulation could avert as many as 32,700 infections and 190 deaths annually and save $115 million, it was blocked by opposition from large hospitals.

There's a simple reason why hospitals opposed this regulation: it would cost them money to implement these procedures, but the hospitals wouldn't realize any of the savings--insurance companies would. Arguably, this is why there are regulators: some things, such as not turning 190 hospital workers into dead people, are worth the financial hit. But as long as savings--and keep in mind the program would have lowered overall costs by $115 million annually--are parceled out among different special interest groups*, each armed with lobbyists that can corrupt oversight mechanisms, then we will continue to have health care inefficiencies that kill people.

That's why we need socialized insurance--not answerable to shareholders--because it's actually more efficient economically and in terms of public health.

*Younger readers might not know this, but there was a time when the phrase special interest group did not mean black people or teachers' unions.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & HealthPolitics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/89176

Comments

1

OSHA standard setting is a very complicated process designed to make it extreamly hard to get something through, too hard I thing. More information on OSHA standards can be obtained at www.osha30hourtraining.com, you should check it out if you need more indepth training.

Posted by: OSHA Pro | February 22, 2009 10:16 PM

2

To setup OSHA Standards by a company is really difficult & time consuming process. Further information about such training can be available from http://www.oshacompliancesafetytraining.com can be available.

Posted by: OshaTraining | September 30, 2009 7:49 AM

3

The OSHA standard creation process is actually a very complicated process. New standards are not created overnight, and modifying old standards is just as time consuming. For more information visit http://www.easysafetyschool.com/. Hope this helps.

Posted by: OSHA 10 | September 15, 2010 3:26 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.