Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Mike the Mad Biologist

Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology

Search

Profile

ntm4-30-7 Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology. Comment policy: say what you want, but back it up with an email address. I don't like anonymous trolls.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Science Links

« Underwater Kites and Electricity | Main | What Is the Heritability of Being an A--hole? »

Stupak-Mills and the Economics of Anti-Abortionism

Category: Blastocyst LiberationCivil LibertiesHealthcare
Posted on: November 16, 2009 10:04 AM, by Mike

I have no doubt that the Catholic ecclesiarchy supports the Stupak-Mills amendment out of a genuine desire to regulate vaginaspreserve the fetus, which they believe is a person. But the financial incentives for Catholic Church-owned hospital systems are enormous:

...consider that there are 60 some Catholic-affiliated hospital systems in all 50 states -- representing 13 percent of the nation's entire in-patient health care system. That's easily tens of billions of dollars flowing through the business arm of the Catholic church that continues to grow through mergers with private and other religiously-affiliated hospitals.

Congressional health insurance reforms promise the prospect of 36 million uninsured Americans -- who are currently self-rationing care, paying on sliding fee scales, or not paying at all -- flowing into hospitals, clinics and outpatient facilities via subsidized insurance, mandated policies and more affordable options in the proposed insurance exchange.

Conservatively, those newly insured people will not only add millions of dollars more to hospital coffers in the short term but the potential for trillions in billable services over their lifetimes.

So why would the bishops risk the House health reform bill collapsing under the weight of a bitter abortion debate? It appears to be a fairly brazen attempt to kneecap their health care industry competitors while knowing the president's top domestic agenda would be passed in some way, shape or form.

Catholic institutions are uniquely bound by religious directives on care, effectively eliminating key reproductive health and end-of-life treatment that other institutions will provide to patients and bill to their insurance carriers.

Add those restrictions and compound it with two simple facts: 73 percent of the now uninsured are of reproductive age and the leading cause of death among people aged 15-44 is accidents.

In essence, the people most likely to benefit from the proposed public option and insurance exchange will undoubtedly be seeking the type of care Catholic hospitals refuse to provide as a matter of religious principle. And these prospective patients are young and will conceivably need care for many decades to come....

The bishops can extract abortion care from the private insurance benefits of millions of American women that are federally subsidized ten ways to Sunday (with the blessing of conservative lawmakers' corporate welfare earmarks) and they level the competitive playing field without having to revise its medical doctrine to modern standards of care.

If the Catholic Church wants to engage in a stupid business model, that's its decision (or choice, if you will). But the rest of us shouldn't have to sacrifice the quality of our healthcare because of its slavish devotion to biologically unrealistic dogma.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124797

Comments

1

All public funding should be withdrawn from Catholic and other denominational hospitals if they refuse to service 100% of the population for 100% of their medical needs.

Posted by: NewEnglandBob | November 16, 2009 2:01 PM

2

This is ridiculous. The Catholic Church has consistently been an advocate for universal healthcare.

Posted by: SiuMing | November 16, 2009 2:42 PM

3

@SiuMing: They've also consistently been assholes about gay rights and abortion. I'm amazed they didn't demand gay people not be allowed health care.

Posted by: JThompson | November 16, 2009 5:06 PM

4

The main reason many Roman Catholic priests oppose abortion is that they want more children to molest.

Posted by: libhomo | November 16, 2009 8:06 PM

5

SiuMing @ # 3 - The Catholic Church has consistently been an advocate for universal healthcare.

So long as no one in the universe needs or wants condoms, other forms of contraception, in vitro fertilization, tubal ligation, elective or therapeutic abortion, vasectomies, just about any form of reproductive health care other than pregnancy management & delivery, or information or referrals about any of these.

How they arrived in this universe deserves more research.

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | November 19, 2009 12:28 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.