<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Mike the Mad Biologist</title>
      <link>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/</link>
      <description>Mad rantings about politics, evolution, and microbiology</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:34:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.35</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/scienceblogs/KsPC" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>1184316</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://www.feedburner.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
         <title>Gromia sphaerica: It's a Cool...Macrobe?</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/3050232984_be57604046_o.jpg" width="540" height="540" alt="gromia-540x540" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's &lt;a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/11/20/gromia-cambrian.html"&gt;a neat &lt;i&gt;Discovery News&lt;/i&gt; article about &lt;em&gt;Gromia sphaerica&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a very large testate amoeba:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/gromia_sphaerica_its_a_coolmac.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/gromia_sphaerica_its_a_coolmac.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/461944145" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/461944145/gromia_sphaerica_its_a_coolmac.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/gromia_sphaerica_its_a_coolmac.php</guid>
         <category>Amoeba</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:34:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/gromia_sphaerica_its_a_coolmac.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Political Controversy and Research</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;There's been &lt;a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/11/christianists-stymied-hiv-research.html"&gt;a bit&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/271db2f6-b4e2-11dd-b780-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1"&gt;of talk&lt;/a&gt; about a recent &lt;em&gt;PLoS Medicine&lt;/em&gt; article about &lt;a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0050222"&gt;the chilling effect of political controversy on research&lt;/a&gt;.  The main conclusion--yes, political controversy surrounding topics including "the sexual health and/or orientation of adolescents; abortion; emergency contraception; condom use; anal sex; childhood sexual abuse; homosexuality; and the use of various harm reduction strategies" does influence researchers career and research decisions:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/political_controversy_and_rese.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/political_controversy_and_rese.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/460868105" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/460868105/political_controversy_and_rese.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/political_controversy_and_rese.php</guid>
         <category>The War on Science</category>
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:12:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/political_controversy_and_rese.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Net Neutrality Canard: A New Corporate Conservative Wedge</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the fights that will have a significant long-term effect on the freedom of the press is over &lt;a href="http://www.iamtrex.com/?p=1974"&gt;net neutrality&lt;/a&gt;.  Oddly enough, conservatives, even though, at one point, the political blogosphere was predominantly conservative (no, really, it was), have been shrieking about the Fairness Doctrine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_net_neutrality_canard_a_ne.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_net_neutrality_canard_a_ne.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/459728646" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/459728646/the_net_neutrality_canard_a_ne.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_net_neutrality_canard_a_ne.php</guid>
         <category>Internet</category>
         
         <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:47:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_net_neutrality_canard_a_ne.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Fourth, Unnamed Horseman of the Apocalypse That Is the GM Bailout</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't a clue as to how to proceed about the potential auto industry bailout, and anyone who can say with confidence about how the largest industrial bailout in U.S. history will play out is kidding themselves.  My instinct is not to lose U.S. controlled industrial capacity on national security grounds.  But to follow on something driftglass discussed, there seems to be one group of people who aren't getting blamed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_fourth_unnamed_horseman_of.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_fourth_unnamed_horseman_of.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/458502533" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/458502533/the_fourth_unnamed_horseman_of.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_fourth_unnamed_horseman_of.php</guid>
         <category />
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_fourth_unnamed_horseman_of.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Why the "Center-Right" Debate Is Maddening: It's the Lack of Statistics, Stupid</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Many in the Punditocracy are proclaiming that the U.S. is a center-right country.  While it's pretty obvious that they're saying this to justify their feeble pronouncements, that's not what really bugs me about this center-right hooey.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_the_centerright_debate_is.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_the_centerright_debate_is.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/457274897" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/457274897/why_the_centerright_debate_is.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_the_centerright_debate_is.php</guid>
         <category>Statistics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:14:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_the_centerright_debate_is.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Are We Talking About the Same Democrats?</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently, Al-Queda is quite...concerned about having Democrats in power.  By way of &lt;a href="http://www.mahablog.com/2008/11/16/the-deadly-democrats/"&gt;maha&lt;/a&gt;, I found this &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/14/AR2008111403046.html"&gt;David Ignatius op-ed&lt;/a&gt;, who quotes Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradhawi (italics mine):&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/are_we_talking_about_the_same.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/are_we_talking_about_the_same.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/456460229" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/456460229/are_we_talking_about_the_same.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/are_we_talking_about_the_same.php</guid>
         <category />
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:30:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/are_we_talking_about_the_same.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Irrationality of the Health Insurance Market</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the arguments for keeping private insurers in the healthcare system is that they will incentives to control costs.  In Massachusetts, erm, &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/11/16/a_healthcare_system_badly_out_of_balance/?page=full"&gt;not so much&lt;/a&gt;.  First, some background:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_irrationality_of_the_healt.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_irrationality_of_the_healt.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/456106105" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/456106105/the_irrationality_of_the_healt.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_irrationality_of_the_healt.php</guid>
         <category>Healthcare</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:15:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_irrationality_of_the_healt.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Why Political Corruption Matters: Dianne Wilkerson</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been meaning to post about &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/10/thank_the_intelligent_designer.php"&gt;the corruption case involving former MA State Senator Dianne Wilkerson&lt;/a&gt; because it really lays out the most corrosive effect of corruption--&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/11/02/unsolved_mysteries/"&gt;a loss of trust&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_political_corruption_matte.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_political_corruption_matte.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/455037318" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/455037318/why_political_corruption_matte.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_political_corruption_matte.php</guid>
         <category>Basic Human Decency</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:26:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/why_political_corruption_matte.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>"Facts Alone May Not Completely Allay Fears": Sums Up the Theopolitical Rightwing Pretty Well</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;By way of &lt;a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/rapture_ready_hand_scanners/"&gt;Amanda&lt;/a&gt;, I came across this letter sent to employees of a company that had &lt;a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/13/the-hand-scanner-of-the-beast/"&gt;installed a hand scanner to replace punch-card system for workers checking in and out of work&lt;/a&gt; (boldface original; italics mine): &lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/facts_alone_may_not_completely.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/facts_alone_may_not_completely.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/454099117" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/454099117/facts_alone_may_not_completely.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/facts_alone_may_not_completely.php</guid>
         <category>Fucking Morons</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:41:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/facts_alone_may_not_completely.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>How Will the GOP Rebuild?</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Not that this is a real concern of mine, but something &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/26/901/09483/489/637180"&gt;Kos wrote a while ago about the possibility of Huckabee becoming the RNC party chairman&lt;/a&gt; interested me:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/how_will_the_gop_rebuild.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/how_will_the_gop_rebuild.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/452958051" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/452958051/how_will_the_gop_rebuild.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/how_will_the_gop_rebuild.php</guid>
         <category />
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/how_will_the_gop_rebuild.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Long Term Problems for the GOP: Maps of College Grads, Independents, and Moderates</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;At the &lt;em&gt;Washington Independent&lt;/em&gt;, Aaron Wiener has made &lt;a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/17988/this-is-what-the-2008-electoral-map-would-look-like-if-the-election-were-decided-by-fill-in-the-blank"&gt;a bunch of electoral college maps&lt;/a&gt; that show how the candidates would have done if only one particular demographic group had voted.  First, registered independents:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/long_term_problems_for_the_gop.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/long_term_problems_for_the_gop.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/452255146" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/452255146/long_term_problems_for_the_gop.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/long_term_problems_for_the_gop.php</guid>
         <category />
         
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:47:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/long_term_problems_for_the_gop.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Change Needed at the CDC: Gerberding</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;In light of all the executive branch changes people are hoping for, I wonder how much longer CDC Director Julie Gerberding has.  I'm guessing she's there until late January....&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/change_needed_at_the_cdc.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/change_needed_at_the_cdc.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/451926186" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/451926186/change_needed_at_the_cdc.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/change_needed_at_the_cdc.php</guid>
         <category>CDC</category>
         
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:37:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/change_needed_at_the_cdc.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Real Impetus Behind the Republican War on Science</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Admittedly, this isn't anything regular ScienceBlogs readers haven't seen before, but it's nice to see it enter the mainstream media (albeit eight years too late).  &lt;a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/167618"&gt;Sharon Begley&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_real_impetus_behind_the_re.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_real_impetus_behind_the_re.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/451129703" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/451129703/the_real_impetus_behind_the_re.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_real_impetus_behind_the_re.php</guid>
         <category>The War on Science</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:13:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/the_real_impetus_behind_the_re.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Commensal Bacterium May Reduce Crohn's Disease Outbreaks</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/105/43/16731.abstract"&gt;A recent paper&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt; suggests that the gut bacterium &lt;em&gt;Faecalibacterium prausnitzii&lt;/em&gt; reduces the recurrence of ileal Crohn's disease.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/commensal_bacterium_may_reduce.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/commensal_bacterium_may_reduce.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/450805448" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/450805448/commensal_bacterium_may_reduce.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/commensal_bacterium_may_reduce.php</guid>
         <category>Microbiology</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/commensal_bacterium_may_reduce.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Interesting Dig at NY Times Public Editor by NYT Columnist</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;You don't see this every day:  Charles Blow, the &lt;em&gt;NY Times&lt;/em&gt; visual Op-Ed columnist, &lt;a href="http://blow.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/without-appalachia/"&gt;takes a dig at the &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;' Public Editor&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/interesting_dig_at_ny_times_pu.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/interesting_dig_at_ny_times_pu.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~4/450027584" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/KsPC/~3/450027584/interesting_dig_at_ny_times_pu.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/interesting_dig_at_ny_times_pu.php</guid>
         <category>News Media</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:40:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2008/11/interesting_dig_at_ny_times_pu.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
