Mixing Memory : Moral Psychology on Blogging Heads

Search this blog

Profile

Cognitive stuff from a cognitive person. If you've got any requests, drop me an email. If it takes me a while to get to it, drop me another one.

The lovely banners were created by Anton Oetll and Todd Hartman.

April is the cruelest month, breeding lilacs out of the dead land, mixing memory and desire, stirring dull roots with spring rain.

Reading Group

The Mixing Memory Reading Group is a place for experts and non-experts alike to discuss books and papers in cognitive science.

Blogs For All and For None

Cognitive Science and the Like

The Lesser Sciences

Philosophy

Feminists

Politics Or Close to It

Seriously Good But I Don't Know What to Call It

Journals

« ΔV, Dude | Main | Brandon on Zombies »

Moral Psychology on Blogging Heads

Category: Cognitive Science News
Posted on: March 29, 2008 5:07 PM, by Chris

You can see Josh Knobe, of Experimental Philosophy fame, and Paul Bloom, who doesn't have a blog but has one of them professorship things up at some podunk little school in New Haven, CT, talking about research in moral psychology here.

Comments

knobe does better as the alpha me thinks. i wonder what bloom thinks of the work of the functionalists in the 'explaining religion' project....

Posted by: razib | March 29, 2008 5:30 PM

It's interesting that they talk about the mind leaving the body, but when it does it still seems to have many of the same properties that a body does: it's located in time and space and in the case of a ghost it may have some of the physical features of the body such as a face with eyes, ears, nose, and a mouth. They also mention that God is usually associated with some physical form. A plausible explanation might be that the most basic innate concepts we have about minds and bodies make the distinction between animate and inanimate objects and the distinction between matter and consciousness is not an innate concept but something that arises from a much more advanced inferential process. I don't think they explicitly state that, but it's what they seem to be implying. Stories of Greek and Roman gods seem to sort of go back and forth between thinking of the gods as being similiar to super heroes and having bodies and them being like gods that are similiar to the God of contemporary religion. Greek gods were apparently thought of as immortal not because they were immaterial, but rather because of some God-like property that they had.

Posted by: Mortimer | March 30, 2008 1:06 PM

...a blog post triggered by the diavlog.
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2008/03/religion-biology-psychology-sociology.php

Posted by: razib | March 30, 2008 3:12 PM

...and another blog post, hat tip to you. Thanks!
http://channeln.blogspot.com/2008/03/morals.html

Posted by: Sandra | March 31, 2008 12:03 AM