Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

Molecules: You'd better learn to live with them.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information


The author is not a physician. The content on this website does not, and is not intended to constitute medical advice. It should not be relied upon when making medical decisions. It is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other healthcare provider.

« Brodifacoum (Warfarin: with a vengance) | Main | Benzoylecgonine (Sewer tattletale) »

DBU (Crowded base)

Category: Synthesis
Posted on: January 24, 2007 7:48 PM, by Molecule of the Day

Basicity and nucleophilicity are two related concepts, but they don't always correlate. This is part of what makes teaching and learning chemistry so tricky, especially at first, when it seems like you're just learning a collection of facts (rather than the holistic wonder that is chemistry!). A base, by one pretty good definition, is something that is good at donating its electrons, allowing it to accept H+ - a proton. A nucleophile is a bit trickier to explain - it is good at donating its electrons, allowing it to react with certain species called electrophiles, forming a bond. The groups often overlap - hydroxide is a good base and a good nucleophile, as is methylamine. Iodide is a terrible base, but it's a great nucleophile.

Oftentimes, you want a good base, but a bad nucleophile. For instance, if you have a reaction that releases protons, you might want to mop up those protons as the reaction goes along. Many bases will interfere (Because of their nucleophilicity), but ones that are "sterically hindered" (crowded, pretty much), tend not to. DBU is one such base. Great base, terrible nucleophile.

InChI=1/C9H16N2/c1-2-5-9-10-6-4-8-11(9)7-3-1/h1-8H2

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

In freshman orgo, the best definition I've heard for nucleophilicity versus basicity is that nucleophilicity is kinetic, while basicity is thermodynamic.

Posted by: Eric Suh | January 25, 2007 12:33 PM

Consider Proton Sponge and Hydride Sponge. Their outrageous property boost arises from relaxation of orbital steric interaction by grabbing a proton or hydride, respectively. The kinetics are slow but the grab has fangs.

Carbon-centered stable anions are easy: malonate, Meldrum's acid, tri(carboxymethyl)methide; tricyanomethide, orthothioester anions, etc. What happen if Hydride Sponge enters the solution? Its borons chelate anionic carbon to gain a 1/2 negative charge each, and a stable pentacoordinate carbon slowly appears. Worth a look with an inert counter-cation (crypt ligation?).

Proton Sponge and carbocations (guanidinium) might be nice. The somewhat unlikely Big Kahuna is both Sponges plus TCNQ to obtain stable cationic and anionic five-coordinate carbons in one molecule.

Posted by: Uncle Al | January 25, 2007 1:01 PM

All I know is that a base attacks a PROTON (H+) and a nucleophile attacks an electron-deficient CARBON. I think that's the basic difference between a base and a nucleophile in organic chemistry.

Posted by: Joan | February 13, 2007 2:54 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com