Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

Molecules: You'd better learn to live with them.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information


The author is not a physician. The content on this website does not, and is not intended to constitute medical advice. It should not be relied upon when making medical decisions. It is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other healthcare provider.

« Dulcin (A sweetener that's dangerous for sure) | Main | 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (Colorful ketones) »

IBX Acid (More superiodine)

Posted on: May 22, 2007 7:55 PM, by Molecule of the Day

Last November I mentioned the Dess-Martin reagent. Hypervalent iodine reagents are mild oxidants that tend to be more soluble in organic solvent than many of the alternatives. Dess-Martin has largely supplanted another iodine oxidant - IBX acid.

Dess-Martin is more soluble, and, as I understand, a little less inclined to get lively under pressure or impact. Too bad IBX acid is a much cooler name.

InChI: InChI=1/C7H5IO4/c9-7-5-3-1-2-4-6(5)8(10,11)12-7/h1-4H,(H,10,11)

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/41186

Comments

1

Hypervalent iodine is so cool!

Posted by: Vince Noir | May 23, 2007 1:39 AM

2

Unfortunately, using DMP doesn't mean being able to avoid IBX, since IBX is an intermediate to DMP...

Posted by: such.ire | May 24, 2007 2:26 PM

3

IBX does do some reactions which DMP is not so good at - for example Corey's slective oxidation of diols to lactols - Tet. Lett. 1995, 3485 and Tet. Lett. 1995, 7945, so always worth a careful check!
Wikipedia has a useful introduction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-Iodoxybenzoic_acid), which also mentions the theory that preparation by the 'easy' oxone-based route (J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4537) results in non-explosive IBX - a claim not agreed to by the authors of the JOC paper, who found 'an analytically pure sample was subjected to explosability tests, which confirmed the earlier observations by Plumb and Harper.'

Posted by: Steve | May 29, 2007 8:21 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.