Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

Molecules: You'd better learn to live with them.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information


The author is not a physician. The content on this website does not, and is not intended to constitute medical advice. It should not be relied upon when making medical decisions. It is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other healthcare provider.

« Isooctane (Doesn't look like it sounds) | Main | Raney Nickel (Firepowder) »

Cyclohexadiene (Just uphill from benzene)

Category: Synthesis
Posted on: September 18, 2007 8:47 PM, by Molecule of the Day

Integral to organic chemistry is hydrogenation - sometimes you need to make a functional group something a little less oxidized. For example, an azide or a nitrile can become an amine.

Often, we just use hydrogen for this! Metals like palladium can work some real magic doing the heavy lifting here. Process chemists hate hydrogen gas, though, and rightly so - everyone knows about its tendency to explode. It's worse, though - most hydrocarbons have a flammable range of about 1-8% in air - any more, and there's just not enough oxygen to support combustion. Any less, and you don't get enough heat to keep the reaction going. Hydrogen, however, starts a little higher, about 4%, and is still flammable in air up to a whopping 75%! The stuff's dangerous.



Fortunately, palladium can rip a hydrogen off of just about anything and move it to something else, as long as it's energetically "downhill." When you're not using hydrogen, it's called transfer hydrogenation. Cyclohexadiene, if it gives up a couple hydrogens, becomes benzene, downhill by nearly 6 kcals!


Often, this will suffice for a hydrogenation. Something a bench chemist runs at work will likely use hydrogen on the first go (although we use transfer hydrogenation at the bench sometimes!) because it works well. Unfortunately, you have to run it at high pressure in a vessel unsettlingly named a "bomb," and the process guys tend not to like bombs. Transfer hydrogenation will get a close look.


This is not to say that it's never used. In fact, using dihydrogen for hydrogenation at the process scale is often unavoidable (you don't want benzene in your cooking oil, or drugs!). Your Crisco and trans fats are products of a gaseous hydrogenation process.


Please correct me on any of this, process chemists, it's a big day when I work at 10 gram scales.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Once again, benzene resonance makes tings somewhat easier.

Posted by: Scigatt | September 19, 2007 3:03 AM

Formate has a better equivalent weight, is ever so cheap, and doesn't smell bad. Aldrich sells 1,3-cyclohexadiene 100 ml/$(USD)534.00 (1.02 moles net). Price a Parr bomb and a tank of hydrogen.

Do you Greenly recycle the benzene back to cyclohexadiene? "8^>)

Posted by: Uncle Al | September 19, 2007 2:28 PM

We do this reaction in my Organic Chem labs. But, instead of cyclohexadiene, we use cyclohexene. It works great. The existence of cylcohexadiene in the reaction mixture is fleeting, I'm sure. Thermodynamics and aromaticity are just two of the many concepts we can talk about from this lab.

Posted by: Chemgeek | September 19, 2007 4:32 PM

In my lab, we polymerize this stuff to produce poly-(1,3 cyclohexadiene). It is a classical monomer for anionic polymerization, You can do nice copolymers with butadiene, isoprene and styrene...

Posted by: Jean Raynaud | October 28, 2007 8:05 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com