Now on ScienceBlogs: The death of Tetrapod Zoology
Molecules: You'd better learn to live with them.
« Hexanoic Acid (Goats, and Remember Tenderbutton?) | Main | Potassium Chlorate (Explosive or harmless oxygen generator?) »
Category: Poisons
Posted on: August 25, 2008 10:46 PM, by Molecule of the Day
Sarin is an organophosphate that irreversibly inhibits cholinesterase. it's a neurotoxin, and a potent one. It'd be absolutely terrifying as a weapon, if it weren't so unstable. Even if a rogue state had gobs of Sarin last year, it's all pretty much a dud by now. The instability of acid halides (carbonyls there, but all of them in general) pretty much ensures this. So the civilized world has that going for it, which is nice.
How do you test for sarin leaks? With a rabbit.
Find more posts in: 
Physical Science
Medicine & Health
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/79659
starts with a bang! 02.08.2010
the world's fair 02.09.2010
the white coat underground 02.08.2010
living the scientific life (scientist, interrupted) 02.08.2010
Comments
I wonder if wearing that outfit eliminates the normal urge to pet the fuzzy animal and say something either obvious or nonsensical in the babytalk voice.
On the more serious side, I for one am very glad that Germany decided that using nerve agents during the second world war wasn't worth the risk of reprisals. One can hardly say that the war went well; but had the available tabun and sarin been used...
Posted by: phisrow | August 26, 2008 12:18 AM
It's interesting how sarin figures into one of the untold arms races of World War II -- from what I've read (caveat Wikipedior) Sarin and a chemical relative, Tabun, were part of Nazi Germany's research during WWII into organophosphate weapons. They were evidently working on it quite urgently as well, as they took it for granted that the Allies were doing the same research as they were (it was true for the atom bomb, right?). But when it came right down to it, they never got around to using it... and the Allies had never even broached the question.
There is a story somewhere about a German chemical weapons factory worker who got two liters of tabun dumped down the back of his hazmat suit. He was dead before anyone could even open the zipper.
Posted by: Brian X | August 26, 2008 2:55 AM
There has been research into making sarin last longer. In theory, you could incorporate it into a binary weapon so it wouldn't get mixed into a single compound until actually deployed. The shelf life could be as long as five years that way. Such is ingenuity.
Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | August 26, 2008 8:24 AM
In my organic chemistry course we went over the use of binary munitions which allows for long term, ready-for-immediate-use storage for this chemical munition. A faulty memory was refreshed with the help of wikipedia: Isopropanol, isopropyl amine and methylphosphonyl difluoride.
Posted by: Philip | August 26, 2008 8:59 AM
Weaponized US nerve agents were typically stabilized with 1-3% diisopropyl or dicyclohexyl carbodiimide. Over time the muck Officially gelled, rendering munitions notably difficult to neutralize. The charges might have been purposely thickened for adherence and sustained contamination vs. evaporation. War agents seek to disable, wound, and mutilate not kill. Corpses are disregarded. Casualties bog down immense infrastructure, financial, and personnel resources. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were historic not for burning and crushing but for radiation effects later.
In 1918 German corporal Adolf Hitler was temporarily blinded by a British mustard gas attack in Flanders. Steep learning curve. Bush the Lesser will be historic less for spending the NSF's annual budget each week annoying Muslims than for creating some 80,000 chronically disabled veterans. That alone will be a $billion/year in expenses, forever.
Posted by: Uncle Al | August 26, 2008 1:14 PM
I can verify that Brian X. I can't remember where I read it, but IG Farben was doing a lot of work on organophosphates before, during, and after WWII. They are used as insecticides as well as chemical weapons.
Considering the extreme toxicity and speed of tabun, I suspect no one bothered to try and open his zipper.
Posted by: The Chemist | August 26, 2008 2:17 PM
I remember that 15 years ago DIC was an inexpensive peptide coupling reagent, almost as cheap as DCC.
It turns out it was the sarin stockpiling that made for diisopropyl carbodiimide to be a cheap chemical - DIC was manufactured for army as a Sarin stabiliser additive, to eat the acid and moisture traces that ruin sarin over time! Unfortunately, it was later found that the formed diisopropyl urea produced over time in the sarin ammunition ...congealed. The sarin in the US legacy chemical ammunition is perfectly viable but it turned into a jam - which makes it very hard to dispose of as it cannot be simply drained out.
Now Sarin is no longer stockpiled the DIC became pretty expensive again.
Posted by: milkshake | August 26, 2008 10:44 PM
Back when my dad was in the Army, he was part of the Chemical Corps, and over the years I've heard all sorts of interesting stuff about the various chemical weapons, including just how nasty and deadly sarin is.
Flash forward to around 1995 or so -- I'm off in a remote corner of Bulgaria teaching conversational English to highschoolers, when one of my students tells me of what was on the news the prior evening -- the Aum Shinrikyo sarin attack on the Tokyo subway. The conversation went something like this:
"Did you hear about the nerve gas on the Tokyo subway last night?"
"Wait, what??"
"Yes, some cult used sarin. 10 people died."
"They used sarin, and ONLY killed 10 people? Someone f***ed up...."
Posted by: G Barnett | August 27, 2008 6:01 PM
It's a good thing, then, that we only have a little over a half-million pounds of the stuff down here (and, that's only about 1.7 percent of the country's stockpile!).
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/facility/blue_grass.htm
Dave
Posted by: Dave | August 29, 2008 5:06 PM
When I was a child we lived about 2 kilometers from the biggest chemical weapons storage in Russia (http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/kambarka.htm).
The scary fact: we didn't even know about it.
Posted by: Alex Besogonov | August 31, 2008 10:17 PM
On the more serious side, I for one am very glad that Germany decided that using nerve agents during the second world war wasn't worth the risk of reprisals.
Not completely true--the Nazi's did use nerve agents against the Warsaw uprising.
Posted by: eee_eff | December 13, 2008 10:45 PM