The Great Ant Escape
Incidentally, what’s up with the obvious photoshop job in the accompanying image? It looks like a chorus line.
*update* – it seems they’ve swapped the image out for a more sensible one. The original is here.
Oh my… did they just clone the same ant thrice and add a new leaf to each?
This photo would’ve been much nicer with two, no wait!, three ants!!
…but I can’t be bothered to go out looking for them…
I wonder what this ‘Clone-tool’ does?…
O M G !
No-one will notice a thing..
tsk tsk honestly…
I don’t know if I should laugh or cry or explode into hysterics about that photo. Wow–and not in a good way. No one at the WSJ noticed that all three ants had the same exact pose and posture, the same shadow and light, the same everything? They should be embarrassed that they tried to sell that pathetic image as if it’s real, and Getty should be horrified that it cheaply proffered a deceptively false commodity.
To be fair, Getty’s website lists the photo as a “digital composite”. It’s more a question of why WSJ chose to use a doctored photo instead of one of the many undoctored leafcutter shots available.
New comments have been temporarily disabled. Please check back soon.
After some consideration, I have decided to move Myrmecos back to its original location:
I apologize for…
I’ve posted all I’m going to say about Pepsigeddon here.
And while you’re doing that, I have answered the Monday Mystery back at my tried and…
Eristalis, the drone fly
Easily mistaken for a bee, Eristalis is in fact a clever mimic…
I would like to point out that when an Australian says “pot plant“, they mean house…