Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Neuron Culture

David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.

Search

Profile

dobbspic I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.

You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.

Twitterature>

Twitter Updates

    Follow me on Twitter

    Worth Noting

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    « "Critical Neuroscience" and the discomfort of being studied | Main | The quick review of new health secretary Kathleen Sebelius »

    Plants, steel, design, and the photos of Karl Blossfeldt

    Posted on: February 27, 2009 12:09 PM, by David Dobbs

    C277652A-BF41-4E28-9C0A-553A2CED3DD8.jpg 9F45645E-BFEA-4C1B-864A-11AAEE704FC0.jpgC4EEED97-83A3-4A3F-9771-FE9627A446C2.jpg

    A while back I tossed up some of Callie Shell's photos of Obama, and the post turned out to be one of the more popular here at Neuron Culture. Recently Soulcatcher Studios, the site that is running an expanded version of that slide show, has a portfolio of the lovely, strange, and arresting 1928 master work of photographer Karl Blossfeldt: Urformen der Kunst, or "Art Forms in Nature."

    Karl Blossfeldt (1865-1932) was a German instructor of sculpture who used his remarkable photographs of plant studies to educate his students about design elements in nature. Self-taught in photography, he devoted himself to the study of nature, photographing nothing but flowers, buds and seed capsules for thirty-five years. He once said, "The plant never lapses into mere arid functionalism; it fashions and shapes according to logic and suitability, and with its primeval force compels everything to attain the highest artistic form."

    I love these things. They're photos of plants meant to evoke human design; but they look like photos of ironwork meant to evoke nature.

    A1CF56E1-C388-4C1D-971C-6D8DD8B7D4F9.jpg

    Plate # 26: Cucurbita (magnified 3 times)

    2DF3F12A-7312-409A-961B-0B30E0622664.jpg

    Plate 45: Delphinium (6x)

    More from the site description:

    Blossfeldt's photographs were made with a homemade camera that could magnify the subject up to thirty times its actual size. By doing so he revealed extraordinary details within the natural structure of the plants. In the process he created some of the most innovative photographic work of his time. The simple yet expressive forms captured on film affirmed his boundless artistic and intellectual ability.

    Published in 1928 when Blossfeldt was sixty-three and a professor of applied art at the Berliner Kunsthochschule, Urformen der Kunst quickly became an international bestseller and in turn made Blossfeldt famous almost overnight. His contemporaries were enchanted by the abstract shapes and structures in nature that he revealed to the world. In 2001 Urformen der Kunst was included in "The Book of 101 Books" as one of the seminal photographic books of the Twentieth Century.


    More at the site, where you can buy prints that, for this sort of thing, seem to me reasonably priced.


    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook
    Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/100838

    Comments

    1

    Very interesting stuff. Thanks.

    Posted by: Art | February 27, 2009 3:02 PM

    2

    Beautiful and fascinating, David. I am especially intrigued having just watched a Nova earlier this week on Evolution and Intelligent Design, and the Dover School Board decision, and how crucial the "engine" of a flagellum was in the case - indeed in the science itself. Although microscopic and organic, it certainly does look as if it was created by an intelligent being. As do many of these photos - as your comment about ironwork emphasizes - proving yet again that it is human design that echoes nature. Plus, they just look so cool.

    Posted by: J. | February 27, 2009 5:23 PM

    3

    "Urformen der Kunst" means something like "Original forms of art". Kunstformen der Natur, Ernst Haeckel's book of lithographs, means "Artforms of Nature"...

    Posted by: John S. Wilkins | February 27, 2009 6:50 PM

    4

    hjbnetdopbn8 357, cfjiovhrtlb4m jweb[;[uy9top[809

    Posted by: poo ralf | February 1, 2011 7:49 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.