Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Neuron Culture

David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.

Search

Profile

dobbspic I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.

You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.

Twitterature>

Twitter Updates

    Follow me on Twitter

    Worth Noting

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    « How the curveball fools you: Illusion of the Year | Main | Human Descent from Lemurs? Could be, sortalike »

    Deficit I mean Health Care Reform: Eye-popping chart dept.

    Posted on: May 18, 2009 1:55 PM, by David Dobbs

    via Ezra Klein comes this bottom-line chart from the Center for Economic and Policy Research:

    ZZ0F689196

    That orange line headed heaven-ward? That's our deficit. All those other lines dipping down? That's our deficit if we had the same health care spending per person as France, Germany, Canada, and the UK (all countries, incidentally, with higher life expectancies than our own). You might say, of course, that even radical reform would not bring us down to their health care spending. We could copy France's system wholesale and still pay more for care. You would be right. But such reforms would bring us much closer than we are now.

    This is a nice turn, for it gets at perhaps a more important point more directly than does even Peter Orszag's scary graph about health-care spending as a percentage of GDP. And as Klein notes, this graph clearly doesn't mean we can automatically reap all savings these other countries generate by adopting their systems wholesale. But to emulate the key parts would definitely save money -- and to not do so is to further compromise our competitiveness (and lower our quality of life by spending an increasing part of income on inferior health care).

    Klein presents the graph as part of rebuttal to some material lately from the (rightly admired) Tyler Cohen. It's a good rich dialogue going there. Get the whole thing at Ezra's new blog at Washington Post.

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook
    Find more posts in: Medicine & HealthPolitics

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/110317

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.