Now on ScienceBlogs: Freethinker Sunday Sermonette: Ricky Gervais on The Book of Genesis

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Neuron Culture

David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.

Search

Profile

dobbspic I write on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications. (Find clips here.) I've also written three books, including Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career — an elemental dispute running some 75 years. Oliver Sacks found Reef Madness "brilliantly written, almost unbearably poignant." Check it out.

If you'd like, you can subscribe to Neuron Culture by email. You might also want to see more of my work at my main website or check out my Tumblr log.
Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com


My Google Shared links

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

« Swine flu digs in | Main | CJR: The health-care reform debate as Groundhog Day »

Will government involvement drive up health-care costs?

Posted on: July 3, 2009 10:33 AM, by David Dobbs

Opponents of a public health-insurance plan pose two main objections: that it will create an 'unlevel playing field' that will harm the private market for insurance (an odd objection, since that playing field already tilts quite sharply away from patients' pockets and health and toward the wallets of the health-insurance industry); and that government involvement will raise costs. 

These objections seem to hold sway to the degree we limit our discussion to what already exists in the U.S. As with squabbles about the problems with our educational (non)system, the picture gets clearer if we step back and test this argument against the larger world.

In an article in Forbes, Bruce Bartlett brings some clarity by doing just that:

We spend $7,290 per person on average versus $2,964 among all OECD countries. Norway, the nation with the second most expensive health system on a per capita basis, spends $4,763. (Currency conversions based on purchasing power parity.)

Of course, Americans know that they pay a lot for health; the rising cost of health insurance for employers is the main reason why wages have been stagnant for years. [NB from DD: Actually, many Americans manage to ignore this, because they don't feel the connection; they know their wages aren't going up, but because they never see the money that the employers pay for premiums, they don't really feel the loss. Put it in their hands and take it out again -- the experience I have as a freelancer -- and you damn well feel it.] But they also fear that any further expansion of government involvement in the health care system will only make it more expensive. This is a key objection to the health care reform bill now working its way through Congress.

The international data, however, show no evidence that increasing government's share of health care expenditures raises health spending as a share of GDP. The top five countries with the highest government share of total health outlays spend almost exactly the same percentage of GDP on health as the lowest five countries excluding the U.S.: 8.2% of GDP on average for the former versus 8.3% of GDP for the latter. (I left out the U.S. because it skews the data; the bottom five countries including the U.S. spend 9.7% of GDP on health on average.)



Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/114067

Comments

1

There is no such thing as "government's share."

The government doesn't have any money. It just takes money from almost all people and then funnels it to other people.

If there is public health care on top of what already exists, people not on the dole will pay for the public plan AND their private plan.

So, of course, their health care costs will go up.

Some people's health care costs will go down because they ditched their private plan and went with the public plan. After all, they are already paying for it.

Posted by: Oatwhore | July 4, 2009 2:16 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM