A new rodent study shows that newborn neurons destabilize established connections among existing brain cells in the hippocampus, a part of the brain involved in learning and memory. Clearing old memories from the hippocampus makes way for new learning, researchers from Japan suggest in the November 13 Cell.
Other researchers had proposed the idea that neurogenesis, the birth of new neurons, could disrupt existing memories, but the Cell paper is the first to show evidence supporting the idea, says Paul Frankland, a neuroscientist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.
Scientists have known that memories first form in the hippocampus and are later transferred to long-term storage in other parts of the brain. For some amount of time the memory resides both in the hippocampus and elsewhere in the brain. What’s not been known is how, after a few months or years, the memory is gradually cleared from the hippocampus.
Researchers have also debated the role of neurogenesis in learning and memory. The hippocampus is one of only two places in the adult brain where scientists know that new neurons form. On the basis of previous studies, many researchers think new neurons stabilize memory circuits or are somehow otherwise necessary to form new memories.
The new study suggests the opposite: Newborn neurons weaken or disrupt connections that encode old memories in the hippocampus.
Neuron Culture
David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.
Search
Profile
I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.
You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.
Twitterature>
Worth Noting
Recent Posts
- I've moved to Wired
- A food blog I can't digest
- Sullivan & Jefferson on blogospheric chaos and the press
- Ozzy! Ozzy! Ozzy! -- Neuron Culture's Top 5 in June
- Aglitter in the net: reading, writing, genes, and leaving your desk
- Tourette's, goalie timing, and downside & upsides
- An interview in which I'm on the wrong side of the table
- Paul Bloom: Pleasure is a by-product
- David Foster Wallace is, indeed, Smarter than You Think
- Best sit in a soft chair to read this
Recent Comments
- complex 41 on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- tütüne son on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- clavis panax on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- TÜTÜNE SON SİGARA BIRAKMATABLETİ on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PARSLEY 7 on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- ORJİNAL GAİN MAX on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- HEMOREX BASUR HAPI on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PEMBE MASKE on Are "orchid kids" the same as "gifted children"?
- PEMBE MASKE on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- PEMBE MASKE on "Push" science journalism, or how diversity matters more than size
Categories
- Art
- Books
- Brains and minds
- Culture of science
- Digital culture
- Economics
- Education
- Environment/nature
- Evolution
- Food and Drink
- Genetics & genomics (incl behav genetics)
- Healthcare policy
- History/philosophy of science
- Interesting if true...
- Journalism & media
- Matters military
- Medicine
- Music
- Neuroethics
- Nota Bene
- PTSD
- Pharma
- Politics
- Psychiatry
- Public health
- Reading
- Science
- Science policy
- Sports
- Viruses, flu, & immunology
- Writing
« The Neurocritic: Genomarketing! | Main | Best blog post title of the day: "I will suck your gruyere" »
Roz Chast's "finite filing cabinet model" of memory confirmed
Posted on: November 13, 2009 2:26 AM, by David Dobbs
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124641


Comments
As Sherlock Holmes put it, in A Study in Scarlet:
More succinctly, Gary Larson said:
Then there's Homer Simpson:
Posted by: Polonius | November 13, 2009 3:59 AM
You may want to read the following article (http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/11/13/why-youre-probably-intuitively-wrong/) which discusses a similar premise.
Posted by: Tsutsugamushi | November 13, 2009 10:28 AM
I consider that a man’s brain originally is like a little empty attic, and you have to stock it with such furniture as you choose.Thanks.
Posted by: dış cephe | November 22, 2009 2:03 PM
But it's important to note that memories are not pushed out of the brain, just pushed out of the hippocampus and into the cortex (aka "systems consolidation". Akin (?) to Chast emptying the filing cabinet onto the floor - the contents are still there, they're just lying on the floor.
Posted by: Jason Snyder | November 24, 2009 5:33 PM
I like the analogy of the brain working like a filing cabinet. Things are stored up until capacity, and when people are ready to "unload" they open another drawer or empty the current one out. Nice article.
Posted by: File Cabinets | December 9, 2009 2:45 PM