Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Neuron Culture

David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.

Search

Profile

dobbspic I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.

You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.

Twitterature>

Twitter Updates

    Follow me on Twitter

    Worth Noting

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    « The importance of stupidity in scientific research (and in writing), by Randy Burgess | Main | "No pity party, no macho man." Psychologist Dave Grossman on surviving killing »

    Still hope for writers everywhere: Robots take over sports desk - but need writer to write lede.

    Posted on: November 5, 2009 6:20 AM, by David Dobbs

    By way of demonstration, the group plugged in stats from the Oct. 11 playoff game between the Angels and the Red Sox:

    BOSTON -- Things looked bleak for the Angels when they trailed by two runs in the ninth inning, but Los Angeles recovered thanks to a key single from Vladimir Guerrero to pull out a 7-6 victory over the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park on Sunday.

    Guerrero drove in two Angels runners. He went 2-4 at the plate.

    Posted via web from David Dobbs's Somatic Marker

    Share on Facebook
    Share on StumbleUpon
    Share on Facebook

    TrackBacks

    TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124076

    Comments

    1

    Sports are pretty robotic anyway, aren't they? Same games, same rules, same behaviors, same press coverage, pretty much the same teams in the same contests year after year, with few real surprises....

    Posted by: IanW | November 5, 2009 7:21 AM

    2

    Ian, with all due respect, methinks you're not paying enough attention. Though I must confess, only a couple sports really engage me. Usu more meaningful if you also play. In right cases -- for me, mainly baseball and tennis, which I have played a lot and (baseball) still play — the play holds dynamics as rich as those of music.

    Posted by: David Dobbs | November 5, 2009 10:29 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

    © 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.