The last time a president won with 60 percent of the vote, for instance, was when Lyndon Johnson trounced Barry Goldwater in 1964. Health-care reform passed the House with only 50.5 percent of the body voting for it. And the senators making up this morning's 60 votes actually represent closer to 65 percent of the population. Harry Reid has much to be proud of today.
Neuron Culture
David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.
Search
Profile
I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.
You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.
Twitterature>
Worth Noting
Recent Posts
- I've moved to Wired
- A food blog I can't digest
- Sullivan & Jefferson on blogospheric chaos and the press
- Ozzy! Ozzy! Ozzy! -- Neuron Culture's Top 5 in June
- Aglitter in the net: reading, writing, genes, and leaving your desk
- Tourette's, goalie timing, and downside & upsides
- An interview in which I'm on the wrong side of the table
- Paul Bloom: Pleasure is a by-product
- David Foster Wallace is, indeed, Smarter than You Think
- Best sit in a soft chair to read this
Recent Comments
- complex 41 on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- tütüne son on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- clavis panax on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- TÜTÜNE SON SİGARA BIRAKMATABLETİ on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PARSLEY 7 on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- ORJİNAL GAİN MAX on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- HEMOREX BASUR HAPI on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PEMBE MASKE on Are "orchid kids" the same as "gifted children"?
- PEMBE MASKE on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- PEMBE MASKE on "Push" science journalism, or how diversity matters more than size
Categories
- Art
- Books
- Brains and minds
- Culture of science
- Digital culture
- Economics
- Education
- Environment/nature
- Evolution
- Food and Drink
- Genetics & genomics (incl behav genetics)
- Healthcare policy
- History/philosophy of science
- Interesting if true...
- Journalism & media
- Matters military
- Medicine
- Music
- Neuroethics
- Nota Bene
- PTSD
- Pharma
- Politics
- Psychiatry
- Public health
- Reading
- Science
- Science policy
- Sports
- Viruses, flu, & immunology
- Writing
« Is this where Gladwell wanders astray? | Main | Avatar smackdown! »
Winning ugly, but winning
Posted on: December 24, 2009 10:19 AM, by David Dobbs
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/127845
Comments
It's a win for the insurance companies, that's for sure. For the people who could be forced to be insurance with no limits placed on the insurance companies....not so much. Hopefully the house will keep their spines (the ones the democratic senators gave away) and fight for something that will actually help people.
Posted by: Badger3k | December 24, 2009 12:40 PM
If this were the final work product dealing with healthcare I would be sorely disappointing. But this is just the first salvo in what is going to be a very, very, long march toward a fairer, more equitable and more efficient system.
This includes provisions like actually placing some controls on insurance companies and getting people covered. Sure, most of the demands placed on insurance companies are either things they wanted or have no great problems with. But that isn't the point. These minor things establish a precedent of congress reaching down into them and making rules. It is also a tacit rejection of the mythology about free markets leading to better things for all. It is an acceptance that the insurance companies have been allowed to make their own rules and run things without strong oversight for too long. That much of the excessive cost, inequality and sloppiness is a result of allowing them to run things unsupervised.
It doesn't correct much in and of itself. But it sinks the idea that the insurance companies are the experts and should be allowed to run things without oversight. As such it is a valuable first step in what is going to take a decade to straighten out.
Winston Churchill was said to have said something along the lines of Americans always do the right thing ... after we try everything else. This bill is the first step toward doing the right thing. It is an admission that 'everything else' has failed to work and it starts the discussion of what the right thing might be. It doesn't do the right thing. But it opens the door to doing it.
Merry Christmas.
Posted by: Art | December 24, 2009 4:43 PM