The Rise Of Marketing-Based Medicine
64 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // January 28th, 2010 // 7:57 am
You've heard of evidence-based medicine. Well, a new paper summarizes a panoply of practices employed over the past two decades or so - ghostwriting, suppressing or spinning data, disease mongering and managing side effect perceptions among docs - that the authors call marketing-based medicine. And they rely on internal documents from litigation - such as the much-publicized lawsuits over antipsychotics and antidepressants - to illustrate their point.
A stunning must-read from Ed Silverman on a must-read paper. The comments following Ed's post are also rich.
I imagine there will be blowback and some vigorous challenges to the facts and stats in the paper. But the industry emails quoted are themselves devastating, and suggest how successfully the marketing forces within the industry won out over those who wanted to make drugs that clearly worked, rather than aggressively sell drugs that either didn't work that well or worked for some but carried nasty side-effects that were downplayed.
Pharma, biotech, and medicine itself will be years digging out of the credibility hole this sort of thing put them in.
Neuron Culture
David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.
Search
Profile
I write articles on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications, and am working on my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which expands on my recent December 2009 Atlantic article. In August 2010, I'll be moving to London for a year to work on the book. I'll also serve as a senior fellow at City University London's MA science journalism program.
You're encouraged to check out my third book Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career; subscribe to Neuron Culture by email; see more of my work at my main website; or track Twitter feed, my Google Reader shared items, or my Tumblr log, which gets it all.
Twitterature>
Worth Noting
Recent Posts
- I've moved to Wired
- A food blog I can't digest
- Sullivan & Jefferson on blogospheric chaos and the press
- Ozzy! Ozzy! Ozzy! -- Neuron Culture's Top 5 in June
- Aglitter in the net: reading, writing, genes, and leaving your desk
- Tourette's, goalie timing, and downside & upsides
- An interview in which I'm on the wrong side of the table
- Paul Bloom: Pleasure is a by-product
- David Foster Wallace is, indeed, Smarter than You Think
- Best sit in a soft chair to read this
Recent Comments
- complex 41 on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- tütüne son on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- clavis panax on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- TÜTÜNE SON SİGARA BIRAKMATABLETİ on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PARSLEY 7 on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- ORJİNAL GAİN MAX on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- HEMOREX BASUR HAPI on Coming sort of soon to a bookstore near you: "The Orchid and the Dandelion"
- PEMBE MASKE on Are "orchid kids" the same as "gifted children"?
- PEMBE MASKE on Does the "orchid-dandelion" metaphor work for you? My duel with David Shenk
- PEMBE MASKE on "Push" science journalism, or how diversity matters more than size
Categories
- Art
- Books
- Brains and minds
- Culture of science
- Digital culture
- Economics
- Education
- Environment/nature
- Evolution
- Food and Drink
- Genetics & genomics (incl behav genetics)
- Healthcare policy
- History/philosophy of science
- Interesting if true...
- Journalism & media
- Matters military
- Medicine
- Music
- Neuroethics
- Nota Bene
- PTSD
- Pharma
- Politics
- Psychiatry
- Public health
- Reading
- Science
- Science policy
- Sports
- Viruses, flu, & immunology
- Writing
« Hits of the week past | Main | The mojo of open journalism, plus that itchy beta thing »
The Rise Of Marketing-Based Medicine (via Pharmalot)
Posted on: January 31, 2010 2:14 PM, by David Dobbs
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/130720

You've heard of evidence-based medicine. Well, a new paper summarizes a panoply of practices employed over the past two decades or so - ghostwriting, suppressing or spinning data, disease mongering and managing side effect perceptions among docs - that the authors call marketing-based medicine. And they rely on internal documents from litigation - such as the much-publicized lawsuits over antipsychotics and antidepressants - to illustrate their point.
Comments
My favorite side effect from the drug commercials (I forget which drug, unfortunately) is "skeletal pain."
Ow. My skeleton hurts.
If you can't develop new treatments for old diseases, just invent new diseases for your old treatments.
Posted by: feralboy12 | January 31, 2010 2:56 PM