Neurophilosophy

Diagnosing Dostoyevsky’s epilepsy

Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) is arguably the greatest novelist of all time. He cast a long shadow over world literature, and subsequently influenced many great writers, from Hermann Hesse, Marcel Proust and Franz Kafka, to Ernest Hemingway, Gabriel Garcia Marquez and Jack Kerouac.

Dostoyevsky had a profound insight into the human condition. He was much more than a novelist: he was also a psychologist and a philosopher. In his novels, Dostoyevsky explored subjects such as free will, the existence of God, and good and evil. The characters in his novels are most often portrayed as living in extremely impoverished conditions. They usually suffered with equally impoverished states of mind, and were always placed within the social and political context of life in nineteenth century Russia.

Dostoyevsky was, perhaps, the most famous epileptic in history. The condition had a major influence on his philosophy and his conception of life. A recurring theme in his writing, epilepsy is something he analysed in great detail in many of his novels. Some have speculated that the course of the illness was reflected in how his writing changed throughout his life.

In Dostoyevsky, neurologists have a rich source of information about epilepsy. Some of this information is first-hand, in the form of the writer’s own descriptions of his seizures and symptoms, as related in his various correspondences. There are also numerous second-hand descriptions of Dostoyevsky’s condition, provided by his second wife, physicians who treated him, and friends. And, of course, there are the accounts of epileptic characters in his novels, which one can safely assume are based on his own experiences.

Dostoyevsky’s own descriptions of his condition, and those of his relatives and acquaintances, contain descriptions of various types of epileptic seizures. Dostoyevsky himself wrote, in a letter to his brother Mikhail dated 1865, that he had “all sorts of attacks”. Consequently, diagnosing Dostoyevsky’s epilepsy has proved extremely difficult, and there has been disagreement among neurologists about the nature of his condition; some have diagnosed him with generalized epilepsy, others believe he suffered from temporal lobe epilepsy, and yet others suggest that he may have had a combination of the two.

An early attempt at diagnosing Dostoyevsky’s condition was made by Sigmund Freud, who trained as a neurologist, and described epilepsy as “an organic brain disease independent of the psychic constitution”. Freud believed that the condition was incompatible with great intellect, because it was “associated with deterioration and retrogression of the mental performance”; “What is generally believed to be epilepsy in men of genius,” Freud wrote, “are always straight cases of hysteria”. And this is exactly how the psychoanalyst interpreted Dostoyevsky’s epilepsy. In an essay entitled Dostoyevsky and Parricide, which was first published in 1928, Freud suggested that the onset of the Dostoyevsky’s epilepsy is intimately connected to the death of his father:

Dostoyevsky called himself an epileptic…it is highly probable that this so-called epilepsy was only a symptom of his neurosis and must accordingly be classified as hystero-epilepsy – that is, as severe hysteria. The most probable assumption is that the attacks went back far into his childhood, that their place was taken to begin with by milder symptoms and that they did not assume an epileptic form until after the shattering experience of his eighteenth year – the murder of his father.

Dostoyevsky was the second of seven children. His father, Mikhail Dostoyevsky, was a retired military surgeon who served as a doctor at Moscow’s Mariinsky for the Poor. He was also an alcoholic who was prone to violence, and, although there are numerous accounts of the cruelty with which he treated his children, Dostoevsky’s personal correspondences suggests that he and his father had a loving relationship. Nevertheless, Freud asserted that the writer hated his father and wished him dead, and that Dostoyevsky’s “alleged epilepsy” was a physical manifestation of the guilt he felt when his father died. Thus, according to Freud, Dostoyevsky’s epilepsy was psychological, and not physiological, in origin. 

Dostoyevsky’s father died in 1839, but the circumstances surrounding his death are by no means certain. According to one account, he was murdered by his own serfs, who restrained him during one of his drunken rages and poured vodka down his throat until he drowned. Another account holds that he died of natural causes, and that a neighbour invented the story of his murder so that he might buy the Dostoyevsky estate at a low price. Regardless, neurologists and scholars of the Slavic language and literature are in agreement that Freud’s diagnosis of “hystero-epilepsy” was wrong. They cannot, however, agree on exactly when it was that Dostoyevsky’s seizures began. Some believe that they began in Dostoyevsky’s childhood, with the first seizure taking place in 1831, when Dostoyevsky was 9 years old, while others claim they began in his teens or early adulthood. Dostoyesky himself stated that his seizures began one Easter night during his exile in western Siberia. He had been arrested on April 23rd, 1849, for his involvement with the Petrashevsky circle, a group of liberal intellectuals. After his arrest, Dostoyevsky was subjected to a mock execution, as a form of psychological torture. Subsequently, he was convicted of political offences against the Russian state, and taken to Semipalatinsk prison in Omsk; some researchers have suggested that the trauma of the mock execution is what triggered his epilepsy.

From 1860, Dostoyevsky recorded the dates of his seizures in a notebook; from that time, up to his death some 20 years later, he documented 102 seizures. This provides the researcher with precise information about the frequency of his attacks. In 1869, for example, he noted that, in previous years, he had been experiencing a seizure about once every three weeks, and that one attack was often followed after a short interval by a second one.

Nikolay Strakhov, a philosopher and literary critic, and a friend of Dostoyevsky’s, witnessed one of the great writer’s seizures in 1863:

[Dostoyevsky]…walked about the room while I sat at the table. He was saying something lofty and joyous; when I encouraged his idea with some comment or other he turned to me with an exalted look, showing that his emotion was at its height. He stopped for a moment, as if seeking words for his thought, and had already opened his mouth. I gazed at him with fixed attention, sensing that he was about to say something unusual, that I would hear a revelation of some kind. Suddenly there came from his open mouth a weird, longdrawn-out and senseless sound, and he fell unconscious on the floor. This time the fit was not a strong one. The effect of his convulsion was that his whole body stretched out and he foamed at the mouth. In half an hour he regained consciousness and I walked home with him. 

Like most of the autobiographical accounts, and those written by other acquaintances, this is a description of a generalized convulsive seizure. This type of seizure, known as a tonic-clonic or grand mal seizure, is characterized by abnormal electrical activity in both hemispheres of the brain; this causes a rigid extensor spasm in which all the muscles in the body contract, which is followed immediately by loss of consciousness. 

Here, Dostoyevsky’s second wife, Anna Grigorievna, describes the first seizure she witnessed; the description is very similar to that of Strakhov:

Fyodor Mikhailovich [Dostoyevsky] was talking with my sister and was very excited; suddenly he became pale, lurched on the divan and began to lean over to my side. I looked with much astonishment at the change in his face; suddenly came a fearful cry, a cry that had nothing human about it – almost a howl and my husband continued to lean over more and more.

According to Dostoyevsky, most of the seizures of this type occurred at night, when he was either alone or with his spouse. But there are other accounts of seizures which occurred during the daytime, in the presence of other people. These attacks were usually preceded by something called an “ecstatic aura”, which is a warning of an impending seizure. The aura sometimes consists of odours, lights, or other sensations; at other times it is just a “gut feeling” that one is about to experience a seizure. It is always followed by loss of consciousness, and is characteristic of temporal lobe epilepsy, which is rarer than generalized epilepsy. 

In the following passage, Strakhov relates Dostoevsky’s own description of the aura:

Fyodor Mikhailovich often told me that before the onset of an attack there were minutes in which he was in rapture. “For several moments,” he said, “I would experience such joy as would be inconceivable in ordinary life – such joy that no one else could have any notion of. I would feel the most complete harmony in myself and in the whole world and this feeling was so strong and sweet that for a few seconds of such bliss I would give ten or more years of my life, even my whole life perhaps.”

As a result of his fits he would sometimes bruise himself in falling, and his muscles would hurt him from his convulsions. Now and then his face turned red and sometimes splotches appeared. But the most important thing was that he lost his memory and for two or three days he would feel utterly broken. His mental condition was also grievous: he could scarcely overcome his anguish and hypersensitivity. The nature of this anguish, in his own words, was that he felt he was some kind of criminal; it seemed to him that he was weighed upon by mysterious guilt, by a great crime.

The most notable epileptic characters in Dostoyevsky’s novels are Prince Myshkin in The Idiot and Smerdyakov in The Brothers Karamazov. Myshkin is almost certainly an autobiographical character, based on Dostoyevsky’s own experiences of epilepsy. Through Myshkin, Dostoyevsky provides the most vivid literary accounts of the ecstatic aura, and he also depicts how epileptics are perceived by society. In his fictionalized accounts of his epilepsy, particularly as portrayed through Myshkin, Dostoyevsky emphasises the reactions of those people who witness the seizures. Myshkin is portrayed as a Christ-like figure whose emotions and intellect have been arrested by his illness. He is ostracized by those around him, partly because of his illness (the “idiot disease”). It is by his accounts of epilepsy, and the stigma attached to it, that Dostoyevsky has contributed hugely to the destigmatization of the condition. 

At the beginning of The Idiot, we learn that Myshkin is returning by train to Russia after 4 years at a sanatorium in Switzerland, where he was being treated for “some strange nervous malady – a type of epilepsy, with convulsive spasms”. Myshkin also tells his fellow train passengers that “They [the Swiss doctors] could not teach me very much on account of my illness”. In this passage, Dostoyevsky gives a vivid account of the ecstatic aura preceding one of Myshkin’s seizures:

He was thinking, incidentally, that there was a moment or two in his epileptic condition almost before the fit itself (if it occurred in waking hours) when suddenly amid the sadness, spiritual darkness and depression, his brain seemed to catch fire at brief moments…His sensation of being alive and his awareness increased tenfold at those moments which flashed by like lightning. His mind and heart were flooded by a dazzling light. All his agitation, doubts and worries, seemed composed in a twinkling, culminating in a great calm, full of understanding…but these moments, these glimmerings were still but a premonition of that final second (never more than a second) with which the seizure itself began. That second was, of course, unbearable.

This very famous account of an ecstatic aura has helped neurologists to localise the origins of Myshkin’s, and hence Dostoyevsky’s, epileptic seizures. The emotional content of the aura suggests that this type of seizure was caused by abnormal electrical activity in parts of the temporal lobe; the emotions are associated with activity in structures of the limbic system – specifically, the hippocampus, amygdala and neocortex of the temporal lobe. The Idiot was written in 1867-68, when Dostoyevsky was having emotional and financial difficulties. With his wife, he set off for Europe, travelling from one city to the next, to avoid his creditors and to seek treatment for his epilepsy. This was a period during which Dostoyevsky experienced a number of severe seizures, perhaps as a result of the psychological burden of his circumstances. 

The above account of Myshkin’s aura is something akin to a transcendental experience. Indeed, temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with transcendental experiences and hyper-religiosity. For example, the emperor Constantine is believed to have suffered from temporal lobe epilepsy; it is said that, before the Battle of Milvian Bridge in A. D. 312, Constantine saw a vision of the cross emblazoned in the sky, with the words In hoc signo vinces (“In this sign you will win”), and, after winning the battle, made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. Dostoyevsky was deeply religious, and this religiosity may well have been a result of his epilepsy. On Easter night, during his exile in Siberia, Dostoyevsky was visited by an old friend, to whom he described the almost prophetic vision he had experienced during the aura preceding one of his attacks:

The air was filled with a big noise and I tried to move. I felt the heaven was going down upon the earth, and that it had engulfed me. I have really touched God. He came into me myself; yes, God exists, I cried, You all, healthy people, have no idea what joy that joy is which we epileptics experience the second before a seizure. Mahomet, in his Koran, said he had seen Paradise and had gone into it. All these stupid clever men are quite sure that he was a liar and a charlatan. But no, he did not lie, he really had been in Paradise during an attack of epilepsy; he was a victim of this disease as I am. I do not know whether this joy lasts for seconds or hours or months, but believe me, I would not exchange it for all the delights of this world.

Several other lines of evidence point to temporal lobe epilepsy. Firstly, two notations by Dostoyevksy describe a speech disorder following some of his fits: one entry in his diary reads “I was a long time unable to speak”; another reads “When writing I still made mistakes with the words”. These accounts of impaired speech following a seizure (a symptom known as postictal dysphasia) would also suggest that the origin of Dostoyevksy’s seizures lay in the medial region of the left temporal lobe, because activity in this region of the brain would likely affect Broca’s area, the sppech centre in the left temporal lobe. Also, in 1880, while he was writing his last novel, Dostoyevsky’s 3 year-old son Alyosha, died of epilepsy. Of all the known types of epilelpsy, only three are known to have a genetic component, and temporal lobe epilepsy is one of them. 

Dostoyevsky’s last novel, The Brothers Karamazov, which was completed in late 1880, just a few months before the writer’s death, provides a possible explanation for the different types of seizures described in various accounts of the writer’s epilepsy. In the novel, the epileptic character is Smerdyakov, the illegitimate orphan son of Karamazov Snr., the product of a rape, who was “conceived in a fetid passage”. In what could be an allusion to Dostoyevsky’s own circumstances, we learn that Smerdyakov’s seizures apparently started one week after he is slapped about the face by Grygory, one of the familie’s servants. Subsequently, he has seizures of varying severity about once a month. Later on, Smerdyakov takes revenge upon those who rejected him by murdering his father and putting his older brother in the frame. He then stages a simulated seizure to provide himself with an alibi. After murdering his father, Smerdyakov confesses to his brother Ivan:

“You had gone away, then I fell into the cellar.”

“In a fit, or in a sham one?” asked Ivan

“A sham one, naturally. I shammed it all. I went quietly down the steps to the very bottom and lay down, and as I lay down I gave a scream, and struggle, ’til they carried me out to the room adjacent to old Karamazov’s.”

Ivan learns too late that he has underestimated Smerdyakov: “You are not a fool…”

Thus, it transpires that Smerdyakov had real epileptic seizures, but also acted out sham non-epileptic seizures. Evidently, Dostoyevsky was well aware of the advantages of the ability to stage sham seizures, and may have done so himself on some occasions, to avoid over-emotional situations with his spouses or encounters with those he owed money to.

Dostoyevsky’s descriptions of the condition were in line with contemporary neurology, and they remain accurate to this day. In The Idiot, he explains, through Myshkin, that the ecstatic aura is “characterized by a fulguration of the consciousness, and by a supreme exaltation of emotional subjectivity”, and a note in his diary, dated September 7th, 1880, reads: “This morning at 8.45, interruption of my thoughts, transported into other years, dreams, dreamy states, dreaminess…guilt.” This is very similar to the description of the aura provided by the eminent British neurologist John Hughlings-Jackson (1835-1911), who called it the “dreamy state”. Towards the end of Dostoyevsky’s life, Hughlings-Jackson had accurately characterized medial temporal lobe epilepsy, and, during post-mortem examinations, correlated it with lesions in the medial temporal lobe. From the first-hand accounts provided by his epileptic patients, Hughlings-Jackson described the aura as a state of “over-consciousness,” which had “crude sensations” of smell and taste and a heightened intellectual state associated with it:

The so-called “intellectual aura” (I call it the “dreamy state”) is a striking symptom. This is a very elaborate or voluminous mental state. One kind of it is a “reminiscence”; a feeling that many people have had when apparently in good health.

Dostoyevsky’s vivid descriptions of the aura have therefore led many researchers to diagnose him with temporal lobe epilepsy. But some believe he suffered from generalized epilepsy with secondary ecstatic epilepsy. Dostoyevsky may have suffered mild epileptic attacks in his early years; later on, his condition may have been exacerbated by certain events in his life – exile, mock execution, the burden of debt, and even his compulsive gambling – so that his attacks were punctuated every now and then with more severe seizures that were preceded by auras. Another possibility is that Dostoyevsky experienced generalized seizures that were triggered by focal activity in the medial temporal lobe. Because of his epilepsy, Dostoyevsky was, to borrow the title of his second novel, a “double man”; a rational, exalted being on the one hand, and, because of his illness, a mystical and base creature on the other. It seems that as his life progressed, and his epilepsy became more severe, the latter persona prevailed, as evidenced by the increasingly mystical nature of the work produced later in his life.  

Comments

  1. #1 lvaro jos castro rivadeneira
    July 5, 2007

    Very interesting article. I’ve always wondered if there were some way to artificially induce those ecstatic auras…

  2. #2 M
    July 5, 2007

    Interesting article – I’ve never really been able to get in to Dostoyevsky, so this may be a new way for me to look at his work.

  3. #3 onclepsycho
    July 6, 2007

    Man this is brilliant, bravo!
    There are other (perhaps more controversial) aspects that might be linked to temporal lobe epilepsy in Dostoevsky’s work. First, in a way, he obviously had hypergraphia. Of course, patients with hypergraphia usually write nonsensical perseverative lists, but if you look at D.’s handwritten notes they’re quite frightful. Then there’s the novel The Doppelganger (don’t know how it’s been translated in english), which might hint at the experience of heautoscopy, or perhaps some kind of dj-vu or dj-vcu. And I’ve been told that there’s an episode strongly reminiscent of Capgras syndrome in The Idiot, but I can’t bring myself to re-read it again to look for this…
    Pioneer French epileptologist Henri Gastaut wrote that D. was a genius despite his epilepsy, not because of it (he said the same thing of Vincent Van Gogh). It’s futile to argue about this kind of question, I know, but do you have an opinion?

  4. #4 Size
    July 7, 2007

    This is an outstanding writeup of a fascinating subject. Thanks very much for this. Incidentally, there are a couple of repeated lines in the paragraph that begins “From 1860….”

  5. #5 Mo
    July 7, 2007

    onclepsycho – epilepsy is but one aspect of Dostoyevsky’s fascinating but very troubled life. I dare say Gastaut was right, but, as you say, it’s futile to argue the point.

    Size – thanks for pointing out the repeated sentence. It must have happened while I was copying and pasting the post from my old blog.

  6. #6 danny
    July 8, 2007

    awesome writeup, mo. fyodor’s my favorite author, and i never actually knew he was an epileptic. you’ve painted a very human picture here, thanks for that…

    dk

  7. #7 Hazem Akil
    July 8, 2007

    I still remember the first time I read “The idiot” in a very fine Arabic translation when I was at school. The chapter that described Prince Myshkin’s aura is one of the best parts of the novel. I re-read the book in my fourth year at med school in Aleppo, Syria and at the time I was doing my internal medical attachment that included few weeks in Neurology and Neurosurgery at Aleppo Uni Hospital. Now, I am a resident doctor in Neurosurgery and the book (and this particular chapter) is still present in my thoughts and I frequently mention it to the medical students we recieve.
    By the way, the entry is awesome. I take my hat off for your effort and style.
    Hazem Akil, MD

  8. #8 David Harmon
    July 8, 2007

    Alvaro: Such conditions can be easily triggered by electrical or magnetic stimulation of the brain. (Or by pharmaceutical “stimulation”, for that matter!)

  9. #9 Mark Steele
    January 21, 2008

    The BBC Horizon documentary ‘God On The Brain’, explores the relationship between frontal lobe epilepsy and religious experience; and they also show this state can be artificially reproduced in a laboratory using a electromagnetism, a very interesting show.

    More Information here:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/godonbrain.shtml

  10. #10 Mathieu Richardoz
    January 21, 2008

    I’ve been reading your blog for quite some time now, but after reading this particular piece, as both a Dostoyevsky enthusiast and the son of an epileptic mother (coincidence?), I’d like to praise and thank you for your very compelling writing.

    All the best,

    Mathieu Richardoz

  11. #11 John Panter
    December 31, 2008

    Very Interesting. I have one quibble:”the most famous epileptic in history” ?? I would submit that more people have heard of Julius Caesar’s epilepsy. After all, more have read Shakespeare than Freud, or even Dostoievsky.
    Maybe you meant “the most famous literary epileptic?” That might be more apposite, but, after all, Big Julie wrote a fair stick too…
    Happy New Year
    John Panter

  12. #12 June Blender
    February 12, 2009

    I wonder if his gambling might have been related to his epilepsy. I heard Jonah Lehrer (The Frontal Cortex) describe the case of a woman who developed a severe gambling addiction when she was given too high a dose of a dopamine agonist.

  13. #13 Florian
    February 25, 2009

    Thank you very much for this great article. I enjoyed it very much and appreciate the work involved in writing it. Great!

    I read two of D.’s books so far and am planning to read more. I enjoy them a lot and your texts helped me to deepen my understanding of his characters. Thanks and keep it up! ;)

  14. #14 Clare Dudman
    March 10, 2009

    I echo what everyone else has said. Excellent piece. I’ve never read any Dostoyevsky, but now I think I must.

  15. #15 Gundi
    March 19, 2009

    Excellent article. I suffer from temporal lobe epilepsy myself, and I was able to identify with many of the symptoms described – although in my case, the auras consist of brief moments of déjà-vu. Over the years, this became followed by a loss of consciouness and fainting, until I started taking pills for controlling epilepsy, twice a day. I understand perfectly the stigma this disease had in those days, and appreciate D’s work in making it known and demystified.

  16. #16 Habeebah
    March 22, 2009

    Hi, Gundi
    i read the article because i am diagonosed as an epilieptic too, temporal lobe epilepsy. I am from a developing country, Nigeria, please can you tell me about your epilepsy and how u are treeating it? thank you habeebah

  17. #17 rsmith
    May 1, 2009

    Wonderful article. Dostoevsky is my favorite classic author as well. He so well captures the depths and heights of the human experience. If anyone is interested in further reading on the topic of TLE and religious/artistic expression, a great book by Eve LaPlante called Seized should still be available. The ISBN 0-06-016673-8

  18. #18 sswanson
    June 26, 2009

    Great article! I always thought Dostoevsky was more psychologist than writer, and this helps to explain why.

  19. #19 Harold Knight
    October 11, 2009

    I used to think I suffered from temporal lobe epilepsy. I’m beginning to think, however, that it is a blessing. Of course, it is a pain in the neck (well, actually the head–but there’s really little actual pain). The blessing lies in seeing the world (and sometimes hearing it) in a way for which I am grateful: I know what I can and cannot control, and I know when I lose my “ego” for a moment and am simply with my “self.” Those moments make me a writer and a musician. And a university teacher. I hope to teach soon a class in the spirituality of three “epileptic” novels, one each by Dostoyevsky, Sir Walter Scott, and Flaubert. The Gods of creativity smile upon epileptics.

  20. #20 Nathan Tetlaw
    November 2, 2009

    Great article.

    I too suffered from Temporal Lobe epilepsy, which is now well controlled by medication, and I recall those moments just prior to having a seizure. Sometimes I almost miss them, it was this incredible surge or rush of ecstacy an excitement. Absolute euphora, coupled with de javu. This would last up to 20 seconds. Sadly it was followed by terrible headaches and very strong sense of being distant from the world. As though everything around me had changed and I couldn’t relate to things in the same way as before. I realised after a time that it was because my perception had changed. I realised that my mind used certain features to identify objects quickly; perhaps when I saw some wheels, windscreen, and a car aerial my mind would think “car”, but after a seizure my mind would use different things to identify a car; like bonnet, headlights and grill… It was like I saw different things in everything I saw. Was quite disturbing initially, but once I understood what was happening it was ok. Thankfully medications are getting better all the time, I think it would have been a very difficult thing to deal with in times past.

  21. #21 Rick
    January 11, 2010

    Hello. Thank you to ever posted this.
    I knew this existed but have never read it.
    I will be honest I read 1/2 and I am cold and sweating and will finish later.
    This man describes 102 szs. I have had over a 1,000
    plus partials and I I now feel I have had auras all my life ,I,m 47 amazing .
    The feelings this man is saying he would trade a yr. for even his life for I understand .
    I have told several neur,os and a few doctors and nurses that I was glad I had used hallucinogens because this “effect” is the only thing that can come close to describing all the aura and dejavu effects I have felt.
    With a large emory loss and what I call re-learning I now recieve several other new effects . A true flashback of a certain memory then a flood of information almost in a jeopardy manner but the whole show in a few seconds.
    amazing but often this is followed by headache in my frontal lobe (left) and a prolonged eye twitching ?
    Not a seizure but just an exhaustion ,like waking from a night mare.
    I have undergone true shock and memory loss and the sz. disorder is separate so I see it as feeding on itself the shock trauma maybe a nightmare promote the stress and lack of sleep that brings a gmal then the exhaustion from the postictal state allow the other thoughts SHEW! and if I allow it I could have very dramatic full tilt nightmares from a fire memory if all of that blends together I am not sure dr, Phil would want any part of it lol. amazing really.
    I have only recently become scared of all of this and even though I have a hard time understanding it I suppose it is true depression .
    I understand that also and it can become a state where it is “scared of being scared” and a true panic sets in ? wow. very thankful to be sober and drug free .
    Did I mention I sleep walk now also ? real deal ? scary stuff, I made the kitchen table went to bathroom in the kitchen set the clock ? almost an 1 hr. of messing around and my 12 yr old laid me on the couch ? I cry constantly around 13 meds. . oopsI was supposed to think about this man .
    I will pursue at least one of the books so your writing is appreciated and will help to pass it on thanks so much Rick Wichita Ks.

  22. #22 clement
    August 3, 2010

    -Tambien soy epiléptico,también he seguido tratamientos,que no han evitado las crisis,en todo caso,las han espaciado,y estos no me han mejorado en nada,al contrario,han sido peores y más
    inesperados,por lo que hace ya seis años que no tomo nada (bueno,analgesicos).De todas formas,es absolutamente inutil tratar de que los neurologos,hoy,aquí en Valencia(España),se
    interesen lo mas minimo en el tema.
    Los tegretoles,depakines,etc,parece que sí tienen efecto,pero no en todo el mundo. Prefiero los zumbidos que me avisan,horas antes(a veces muchas horas antes),y protegerme yo. Salud

  23. #23 mikedelic
    August 15, 2010

    this was great i am a huge dostoevsky fan and always rankled at freud’s analysis.

  24. #24 charles f
    November 9, 2010

    I knew about his gambling habits but not his epilepsy. Thanks for letting me know. :)

  25. #25 T800
    January 13, 2011

    Good job with the article (thumbsup)!
    It is very interesting, especially the facts how Dostoyevsky created insightful descriptions in his work.

  26. #26 Julie O'Toole MD, MPH
    February 21, 2011

    Wonderful article. Very annoying information about Freud. One has to imagine that he was, in general, a great thinker though most of his ideas have not withstood the test of time. Yet the saying “to the man with a hammer, everything’s a nail” surely applies here.