Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a neuroscientist by training and a writer by inclination Contact me

rss2-1.png


Follow me on Twitter
Get e-mail updates

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« The 2007 Science & Engineering Visualization Competition | Main | "Brain-eating" amoeba kills 6 »

Craig Venter advocates cognitive enhancement

Category: CinemaLinksNeuroscienceTechnology
Posted on: September 28, 2007 4:46 PM, by Mo

At Wired, filmmaker Ridley Scott discusses the forthcoming remastered final cut of Blade Runner. This classic 1982 film depicts a dystopian futuristic society based on artificial intelligence and genetic engineering, and was recently voted as the best science fiction film ever made by 60 top scientists

The interview includes quotes about the film from various people, including this one, in which Craig Venter, the billionaire geneticist who has just had his genome published, gives his views on cognitive enhancement:

The movie has an underlying assumption that I just don't relate to: that people want a slave class. As I imagine the potential of engineering the human genome, I think, wouldn't it be nice if we could have 10 times the cognitive capabilities we do have? But people ask me whether I could engineer a stupid person to work as a servant. I've gotten letters from guys in prison asking me to engineer women they could keep in their cell. I don't see us, as a society, doing that.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/51765

Comments (5)

1

They already have engineered fake women you could keep in a cell, but they come deflated.

Man, I really hope this isn't the 500,000th comment.

Posted by: Matthew L. | September 29, 2007 12:36 AM

2

Aldous Huxley already went there. What frightens me, is that I could see us, as a society going there. I mean we have Orwellian notions coming into being, why not Huxley's of a similar sort. Not that I don't find the idea repugnant, in the extreme, I just don't have that much faith in the human race.

Posted by: DuWayne | September 30, 2007 12:40 AM

3

It's occurred to me before that Downs people come darn close to a potential laborer caste. If we could only prevent the internal malformations....

The problem with engineering a slave/servant caste is that you'd have to take care of them in at least some ways. (Slave == dependent!) A lot of those people imagining engineered servants or houris probably wouldn't be responsible enough. Consider how often we see reports of dogs being mistreated!

Posted by: David Harmon | September 30, 2007 9:28 PM

4

Frankly, I don't think people would end up creating a slave class of genetically engineered idiots, just because idiots aren't terribly useful. Remember, stupid doesn't imply compliant, nor does being smart guarantee resistance to bad authority.

Overall, designing a slave class would probably not be worth it. The sorts of jobs that were best carried out by slaves in the past are the sorts of jobs that are best done machines today. Why bother genetically engineering a drone person to do my dirty work when a laundry machine is cheaper and far less likely to stage an uprising and murder me in the night?

I'd be less worried about attempts to make a slave-class, and more worried about techniques to create obedient compliance among the more influential people---doctors, lawyers, academics, local leaders, etc.

Posted by: Matthew L. | October 1, 2007 12:12 AM

5

Surely the slave class will be robotic, not biological? Much easier to keep, because you can just turn them off (or can we...).

After all, doesn't robot mean 'servant'?

Posted by: Doddy | October 3, 2007 8:58 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM