Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a molecular and developmental neurobiologist turned science writer
Contact me

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« An online book by a prosopagnostic | Main | Think of a word, move a wheelchair »

Susan Greenfield endorses brain training software

Category: Neuroscience
Posted on: September 6, 2007 11:12 AM, by Mo

Susan Greenfield, one of the U.K.'s most prominent neuroscientists, has just launched a brain-training computer program called MindFit.

The software was developed by a company called MindWeavers, for which Greenfield, and David Moore, the director of the MRC Institute for Hearing Research, are scientific officers.

In this BBC news story, Greenfield is quoted as saying that "There is now good scientific evidence to show that exercising the brain can slow, delay and protect against age-related decline."

That may be the case, but why spend good money on computer games when free Soduko probably works just as well? 

Sudoku puzzles courtesy of Sudoku Shack

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/50012

Comments (6)

1

Where is the "good scientific evidence?" I tried a lit search but didn't come up with what I wanted. I'm looking for the paper that says that solving sudoku (or other brain training games) is neuroprotective, or enhances cognition.

Posted by: Mitch Harden | September 6, 2007 3:09 PM

2

I'm still unsure about the whole brain training thing. I've looked for hard evidence that it does actually do what Greenfield says it does, but it seems pretty thin on the ground.

Posted by: Mo | September 6, 2007 3:15 PM

3

I suspect what Greenfield was thinking can be summed up in two words: Ka. Ching.

Posted by: js | September 6, 2007 3:20 PM

4

I suspect you're right.

Posted by: Mo | September 6, 2007 3:53 PM

5

I'm not from the UK, so I am curious, is Greenfield's prominence due to her actual work or her self-promotion in the media. This Times article suggests the later:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2327835.ece

"The baroness’s decision to lend her name to MindFit and to take a significant stake in Mind-Weavers, the company promoting it, could raise eyebrows among fellow scientists. Her high profile in the media has rankled with some and she was twice snubbed by the Royal Society."

Posted by: moonenite | September 6, 2007 5:03 PM

6

expensive stuff especially when you see how easy it is to program such games..
I wonder what were the sophisticated games used to compare with the mindfit ones in the experiment in Israel.

Posted by: torea | September 6, 2007 10:02 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.