Now on ScienceBlogs: ScienceOnline'09 - interview with Christian Casper

Seed Media Group

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a neuroscientist by training and a writer by inclination Contact me

rss2-1.png


Follow me on Twitter
Get e-mail updates

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« Naughty Gloria | Main | Neuron publishes online readers' comments »

Animal experiments? No Sir

Category: Miscellaneous
Posted on: December 28, 2007 10:52 AM, by Mo

Colin_Blakemore.jpg

Professor Colin Blakemore (right), a neuroscientist at the University of Oxford who was formerly chief executive of the Medical Research Council (MRC), has been denied a knighthood "because of his outspoken support for animal research."

This is not the first time Blakemore has been overlooked in the annual honours list, and the fact that the honours system is corrupt and outdated will probably be little consolation to him.

Unlike those who have bought the title "Sir", Blakemore deserves a peerage, as he is one of the few scientists who have publicly supported animal research, even though animal rights extremists have targeted him and his family.

Opposition to animal experiments stems at least partly from the public's ignorance of the importance and aims of such research, and the decision by a spineless honours committee not to give Blakemore a peerage because it might prove controversial does not help matters.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/59776

Comments (4)

1

That's pretty bizarre. An honor historically conferred onto those who were the best killers of humans is now decided by a panel too squeamish to acknowledge science needs kill animals.

How do they think we learn about physiology and medicine? From dissecting potatoes?

Posted by: MarkH | December 28, 2007 2:44 PM

2

I think this is a controversy that is going to go on ad infinitum! If you don't realize how important the research is and if it is your favorite animal they are using it is difficult to make a convert!
Dave Briggs :~)

Posted by: Dave Briggs | December 28, 2007 4:50 PM

3

My paradoxical thinking about the issue is that we cannot by ethical matters expose the lives of human beings without previously testing the drug, (pursuing anatomical investigation etc.) in an animal body or animal paradigm.
On the other hand, animal activists strive out for rights or animal well being... but they know that animals in general are closer to us, simply because scientists investigate on them!

Blakemore deserves the honour.

Posted by: Anibal | January 1, 2008 1:09 PM

4

Safe experiments on mice can be performed here:

Mouse Party

For thought experiments and idea catalysts try this.

Posted by: William James | January 5, 2008 9:29 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM