Please be aware that I do not endorse any of the products being advertised by Proximic at the bottom of the side bar on the right. I am responsible for the content of the side bar on the left and, of course, for all of the written material on this blog, but I have no control over the products that appear in the "Related Ads", or, for that matter, anything in the column on the right.
If I had my way, the Proximic ads would be removed altogether, because they look very tacky and, more importantly, they advertise rubbish such as the Neurology & Psychology of Masculinity audio cassette, by one Dr. Philip Mango, who is associated with a dubious-sounding organization called the National Forum on the Theology of the Body.
Comments
I don't go around suggesting software to people (let alone OSs), but Flashblock means I don't even see those ads...
Posted by: The Ridger | April 12, 2008 9:41 AM
Good point Ridger. I forget to suggest that readers who have not already done so might like to install some ad block software.
Posted by: Mo | April 12, 2008 10:02 AM
Another solution is to use Firefox with the Adblock Plus and NoScript add-ons. As The Ridger, I didn't even know what you were talking about until I turned them off.
Posted by: dos antos | April 12, 2008 10:37 AM
Vonnegut told us that the Tralfamadorians communicate by tapdancing and farting. So does the advertising industry.
Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 12, 2008 11:12 AM
Aren't the ads in the right sidebar how you make money from your blog?
If you don't "endorse" the ads, doesn't principle dictate that you don't accept the revenue?
Posted by: Anthony Knox | April 12, 2008 11:18 AM
One more thing: Is it really ethical to accept ad revenue after suggesting to your readers that they use ad-blocking software?
Posted by: Anthony Knox | April 12, 2008 11:21 AM
I didn't understand what you're talking about, and then I remembered... Firefox. yeah. :)
Posted by: Eyal Ben David | April 12, 2008 11:39 AM
Funny, but my ads are about solid cherry wrap-around bars (as in for the dispensing of alcohol), sunglasses, and Verizon phones.
Our cookies tell all about our tastes..... (or whatever the thingy is that Proximic reads to determine what we might be interested in).
Posted by: pxcampbell | April 12, 2008 12:07 PM
Anthony: I don't receive any of the revenue generated by the ads, and I see nothing wrong with telling readers that I don't endorse them, because I want to dissociate myself as much as I can from the products.
Posted by: Mo | April 12, 2008 1:14 PM
Mo: Anthony didn't challenge you on the ethics of announcing you don't endorse the products. He specifically was concerned about you suggesting that your readers use ad blocking software.
And although you receive no revenue from the ads directly, presumably you entered into an agreement with ScienceBlogs in which you a) understood and agreed that they would place ads along the top, right, and bottom of the page; and b) determined that you benefitted sufficiently from the arrangement to allow them to do so.
So the questions is whether you're getting the benefit while also seeking to undermine ScieceBlog's benefit.
Posted by: Terence | April 12, 2008 4:01 PM
The way I see it, Anthony's is a moot point, because my miniscule renumeration hasn't change since the ads were placed. Plus, I wasn't the one who brought up ad blocking, and I would not have, had it not been for the first comment.
Posted by: Mo | April 12, 2008 4:48 PM
Personally, I think it's quite alright to speak up against those ads. Maybe the people who run scienceblogs will at least consider thinking about whether these ads really suit scienceblogs.
Posted by: Raiko | April 12, 2008 6:06 PM
Another user of NoScript and AdBlock here. However, I suspect a polite complaint to the SEED Overlords would get the offenders booted off the Scienceblogs site rotation PDQ.
Posted by: David Harmon | April 12, 2008 8:04 PM
It is perfectly correct to speak out against the ads since the reality is that you do not endorse them and nor are you responsble for them. So it is right to say so lest there be any confusion.
Raiko agreed. If enough sciencebloggers speak out, then perhaps that particular arrangement would be looked at more closely.
Posted by: John Stewart | April 12, 2008 8:16 PM
David: the SEED people insist on keeping the ads, despite many complaints.
Posted by: Mo | April 12, 2008 8:24 PM