Now on ScienceBlogs: The Heaving, Voluptuous Breasts of the IPCC Chief

Enter to Win

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a neuroscientist by training and a writer by inclination Contact me

rss2-1.png


Follow me on Twitter
Get e-mail updates

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« The neuroscience of itching | Main | Rockatoo »

Neurocinematics

Category: CinemaNeuroscience
Posted on: June 25, 2008 11:50 AM, by Mo

neurocinematics.jpg

Researchers from the Computational Neuroimaging Laboratory at New York University recently carried out a study of the effects of films on viewers' brains.

Hasson et al scanned the brains of 45 participants whilst they watched scenes from a number of films and television programmes. Not surprisingly, they found that all the scenes activated numerous and diffuse regions of the cerebral cortex - visual areas in the occipital lobes, auditory and language centres in the temporal lobes, and so on.

The data obtained were then subjected to a newly-developed statistical method called inter-subject correlation (ISC) analysis, which is designed to measure the similarities in the responses of all the participants. Thus, the first 30 minutes of Sergio Leone's classic spaghetti western The Good, The Bad and The Ugly produced an ISC score of 45%, while Larry David's Curb Your Enthusiasm scored 18%. The study also provides some evidence that Alfred Hitchcock really is the master of suspense - his 1961 film Bang! You're Dead gave a score of 65%:

The fact that Hitchcock was able to orchestrate the responses of so many different brain regions, turning them on and off at the same time across all viewers, may provide neuroscientific evidence for his notoriously famous ability to master and manipulate viewers' minds. Hitchcock often liked to tell interviewers that for him "creation is based on an exact science of audience reactions".

The researchers suggest that the inter-subject analyses they performed give an indication of the effectiveness of a given cinematographic technique in engaging the viewer, and suggest that their findings can therefore inform filmmakers. They also hope that the study will initiate the new interdisciplinary field of "neurocinematics".


Hasson, et al. (2008). Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film. Projections 2: 1-26. [PDF]

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/74906

Comments (3)

1

just as a matter of curiosity/anecdote, Mr. C. Denis Pegge did something similar in Cambridge, way back during the 1950s or early 60s called "Simulacrics". I believe that the British Film Institute has some of the material.


Posted by: casimiro | June 25, 2008 6:25 PM

2

To me it seems that "Curb" in actuality polarizes opinions among viewers to a great extent. Some find it hilarious and full of peculiar insight, while others feel contempt. The relatively low ISC score might reflect this.

"The researchers suggest that the inter-subject analyses they performed give an indication of the effectiveness of a given cinematographic technique in engaging the viewer, and suggest that their findings can therefore inform filmmakers."

Seems like a double-edged sword. On the other hand, it might genuinely yield more "effective" cinematographic techniques, then again it can be also thought as maximizing effectiveness for the average joe -> sacrificing artistic values for mainstream appreciation

Posted by: Olson | June 30, 2008 5:40 PM

3

I don't think Hitchcock films can be thought of as sacrificing artistic values for mainstream appreciation, though.

Posted by: Alfredo | July 9, 2008 11:47 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.