Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a molecular and developmental neurobiologist turned science writer
Contact me

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« Anatomy of a false memory | Main | An overview of corticogenesis »

Supercomputer breaks performancing record running model of the human visual system

Category: Technology
Posted on: June 16, 2008 5:46 AM, by Mo

Roadrunner2_1207sized-1.jpg

Designed and built by IBM, at a cost of some $130 million, Roadrunner is the world's fastest supercomputer. It contains 12,960 IBM PowerXCell 8i central processing units, 6,480 AMD dual-core processors, and occupies nearly 6,000 square feet at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

Roadrunner will primarily be used to simulate the behaviour of nuclear weapons, but will also be used for astronomy, genomics and climate change research. Last weekend, to put it through its paces, researchers ran a program called PetaVision, which models more than 1 billion neurons and trillions of synapses in the human visual system.

While running this program, Roadrunner broke the world record for computing performance: it operated at petaflop per second processing speeds, performing a mind-boggling million billion (or quadrillion) calculations per second.

Related:

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/74163

Comments (2)

1

Hmm, 6000 square feet. Slightly less efficient than the few cubic centimetres of visual cortex that normally does this work. Usually takes 30 years to get a microprocessor that does what a floor-sized computer used to do, right?

And, I'll bet they'll be using more than the few watts of glucose that the brain uses to power itself.

Posted by: Josh | June 16, 2008 7:07 AM

2

"Slightly less efficient than the few cubic centimetres of visual cortex that normally does this work"

Given that the underlying systems that eventually produced the visual cortex had some 4 billion years of development, I'd say IBM is doing rather well so far....

Posted by: Ian | June 16, 2008 7:53 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.