Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Profile

me_w.jpg
I'm a neuroscientist by training and a writer by inclination Contact me

rss2-1.png


Follow me on Twitter
Get e-mail updates

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Search


Selected posts

Books


wishlist.gif


My photos

www.flickr.com

Rotating blogroll

(Complete list/Shared items)

Archives

« Detailed 3D image of Alzheimer's pathology | Main | 1960s documentary: Self-experimenting with magic mushrooms »

Sleep loss & false memories

Category: Neuroscience
Posted on: July 17, 2008 4:53 AM, by Mo

It is well established that certain types of memory are consolidated during sleep. Now Nature News reports on findings presented at the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Forum in Geneva last weekend, which suggest that sleep loss can lead to the formation of false memories:

Susanne Diekelmann in Jan Born's lab at the University of Lubeck, Germany, and her colleagues asked volunteers to learn lists of words, each list relating to a particular topic. For example, they might learn the words 'white', 'dark', 'cat' and 'night' -- all of which can be linked to the word 'black' -- but black itself would not be part of the list.

The researchers then tested their subjects' memories after a night's sleep or a night spent awake. They showed them the list of words again, having added a few extra words, and asked them to recall whether the words had been in the original list. The sleep-deprived group gave more false responses than the group allowed to sleep.

As is pointed out in the comments at the bottom of the article, these findings have obvious implications for the use of sleep deprivation in interrogation, at least when accurate information - as opposed to a false confession - is sought from the suspect being interrogated.

The findings also suggest that false memories are consolidated at the time of retrieval, rather than during periods of sleep deprivation; when participants who had remained awake overnight were allowed to catch up on lost sleep the following night, they produced the same number of false memories as those who had not been deprived of sleep at all.

Diekelmann and Born also found that those sleep deprived participants who were given coffee in the morning produced 10% fewer false memories than those who weren't, and suggest that this is due to caffeine's effects on the prefrontal cortex, one of the brain regions whose function is affected by sleep deprivation.

Related:

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/76469

Comments (3)

1

The whole point of torture is to coerce false confessions.

If you were being tortured, you'd cop to the Lindbergh kidnapping, the Great Train Robbery, and Lincoln's assassination.

Posted by: Globle Warren Terrism | July 17, 2008 6:17 AM

2

This is not to argue in favor of torture, but I don't see how this study has any relevance to sleep-deprivation torture.

The memories which torturers are trying to retrieve were not stored the day before the victims were subject to sleep deprivation, but long before the victim was even captured and the torture took place - long after they've been consolidated by a good night's sleep.

This doesn't mean, of course, that information extracted via torture has any justification or validity.

Posted by: Ian | July 17, 2008 10:14 AM

3

I don't mention torture, and nor does the Nature News article.

Yes, prolonged sleep deprivation is a form of torture, but I'm referring to long interrogations in which the suspect is, say, questioned overnight.

Posted by: Mo | July 17, 2008 10:34 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.