Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets
« How Elsevier politicized the life sciences | Main | Welcome to your Brain »
Category: Blogging
Posted on: August 16, 2008 2:35 AM, by Mo
This blog is included in a list of Top 100 Mental Health and Psychology Blogs, compiled by a site called Online University Reviews.
The list is divided into a number of categories - general, cognitive and forensic psychology, psychiatry, neuroscience, addiction, anxiety, autism, bipolar disorder and depression. Many of the sites listed are already on my blogroll, but a few of them are new to me.
TechnologyTrackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/78997
I concur.
I am sure that there are 72 "News" posts just like this one being prepared just about now. What an honor, being picked from 23,465,001 Mental Health and Psychology blogs.
Then, hilarity ensues when in typical fashion, the Neuroscientists shake their fists at the Psychiatrists, and so on down the line with historical predictability. In all seriousness, what I find disturbing is the chit-chat social networking, and Myspace quality many of even the top "Science Blogs" have become. I hope that the peer reviewed journals never follow suit. Sorry for the rant. I suppose I should open my own shop.
Please, Mo. I was agreeing with Mary, and poking fun at the 23,465,000 other Mental Health and Psychology blogs. I would hope that you would agree with us, in that it's a jungle out there. I think you should feel safe in that I, and a number of thousand others, keep coming back here to roost.
denialism blog 02.14.2012
respectful insolence 02.14.2012
uncertain principles 02.13.2012
confessions of a science librarian 02.13.2012
starts with a bang! 02.13.2012
Comments (4)
Some surprising inclusions and omissions. There has been a discussion about the uneven nature of Brain Blogger on an Orac thread and Ginger Taylor is another odd inclusion - Left Brain/Right Brain is an odd omission. It seems as if the people who compiled this list were concerned with 'balance' in controversial areas rather than quality.
Posted by: Mary Parsons | August 16, 2008 9:19 AM