Now on ScienceBlogs: Competitive Enterprise Institute intends to sue blogger over moderation policy

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Neurotopia

Stronger. Faster. Bloggier. Now chock full of glial goodness. **Warning** contains neuro-nuts.

Search

Profile

EVIL.jpg The Evil Monkey has a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from a southeastern U.S. university. After a postdoctoral nightmare of Inquisitorial proportions, he is currently working in a laboratory and an adjunct assistant professor at a nearby state university.


scicurious2.png Scicurious is a graduate student wrestling with a PhD in Physiology at a southern institution. She is a nerd, a geek, and also a dork. And yes, that really is her brain.


icon.jpgNotoriousLTP is an MD-PhD student in New York City.  After finishing (hopefully soon) his PhD in behavioral neuroscience, he will re-enter the fun vortex that is medical education.



Disclaimer: The opinions on this blog do not represent any organization to which we may belong, or employers, or basically anybody but us. So there.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Archives

Other Junk

Locations of visitors to this page


Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Steal This Button and Link Here!
neurobutton.png


Open_Lab_2009_editor.jpg

« You think your phantom limb is bad, check out my phantom erection! | Main | Remember the Old Days? »

Show me the DATA!

Category: Friday Weird Science
Posted on: October 13, 2008 8:32 PM, by Scicurious

I realize it's been a few weeks, but I'm FINALLY getting a look at all the responses that poured in in response to this post. I'm a good little scientist, and we all have to look carefully at our data. Not all the comments were on here, a bunch of them were over on BoingBoing and Stumpleupon, but I gathered together all that I could in the interests of a high n, the opportunity to look at more variables, and a higher probability of significance.

So the big answer to the question is HERE: DOES masturbation work to clear out your nasal congestion?! Does nasal congestion significantly impede your quality of life? Inquiring minds MUST KNOW!

Unfortunately, I'm not entirely sure how to DEAL with this data. It's all just a matter of "yes" or "no", so I don't have any real variability with which to play. Can someone out there who is well versed in data manipulation help out a poor grad student with very little stats education? I guess all I can come up with is percentages, but can't I play with statistical significance?

But what I can do is let you know what I got, and graph it up for you all pretty. I weeded out the people making snarky comments (that would be most, and many were pretty awesome), and got a total n of 37 people who actually "tested" whether or not masturbation (or sex, I counted both) cleared out their noses. Obviously this is not a controlled environment, so take the results with your usual dose of hearty skepticism.

Final results: 27 out of 37 (72.9% of respondents) said that getting off cleared their noses. Subjects generally noted that the results were short term, from a few minutes to a half an hour at most. One subject complained of sneezing, and one related an amusing anecdote about how he pantomimed to his girlfriend that he needed sex to clear up his nose, and then breathed energetically during orgams to let her know it worked. I can only wonder how she took that.

total%20masturbation%20nasal.png

9 out of 37 (24.3% of respondents) reported that getting off had no effect on their nasal congestion whatsoever and claimed the whole thing was hooey.

Breaking it down by sex (in those cases where I could clearly tell whether the commenter was male or female): total known males were 12, and 9 out of 12 (75%) claimed it worked, the other 25% claimed it didn't. You probably notice that the results here appear to be similar to the general population above.

men%20masturbation%20nasal.png

For women, only 6 respondents labelled themselves as clearly female, and all six claimed it worked for them. Granted, I was not asking for breakdowns by sex, so most females responded with phrases like "it works for women, too". So I wouldn't take the data for females are being representative. Future studies definitely needed here.

And that's what I got! 75% of the time, it works 100% of the time! 75% of the population is a pretty good result, and even though it's a tiny sampling, it never hurts to try! And though this data may be paltry, it's sure better than the data the original author provided: none at all.

Under future studies, I would like to look at effects in women, and whether clitoral vs vaginal orgasm changes whether or not they get nasal relief. I would also like to check how much nasal congestion people suffer before, its cause (whether from sinusitis, colds, allergies, etc), and pre- and post- scores of how much relief they actually get. Not to mention the question of whether or not nasal congestion seriously impedes the quality of life for many people (well, ok, it impedes mine. I love my allergy meds.) Also, further down the line, it would be interesting to see whether masturbation or sexual intercourse is more effective at relieving nasal congestion.

So, how 'bout it?! I bet this could totally be my next grant...

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/83391

Comments

1

I missread: "I bet this could totally be my next grunt..."
Ooops.

Posted by: Coturnix | October 13, 2008 11:36 PM

2

Got any reliable means of congesting the nose? I mean, purely in the interests of science.

Posted by: Zoe Brain | October 14, 2008 12:08 AM

3

You're doing qualitative data analysis involving categories, so a Chi Square analysis would be appropriate.

To do the analysis, there are two basic things to consider: observed frequency (Of;the n observed for each category); and the expected frequency (Ef;the n expected for each category).

Is there a theoretically expected n for each category? If not, let's say it's 50% chance for illustrative purposes.

To assess whether the yes/no observations are statistical significant, the contingency table may look like this:

Of(Y):27
ef(Y):18.5 (1/2 of total n)

Of(N): 9
ef(N): 18.5

To assess statistical significance for gender:

Of(M): 9
Ef(M): 6 (1/2 of total male n)

Of(F): 6
Ef(F): 3 (1/2 of total female n)

The example of a contingency table provided in the link gives you a good idea of how to test the statistical significance of the yes/no and m/f variables simultaneously (i.e., if there is a gender difference in the number of yes and no responses provided).

Posted by: Tony Jeremiah | October 14, 2008 2:23 AM

4

Tony, you are my stats man. I'll get cracking and see what I can do. I don't suppose Excel can run a Chi Square? Otherwise I somehow have to figure out how to do one in GraphPad Prizm...

Posted by: scicurious | October 14, 2008 10:13 AM

5

See if one of these Chi-Square calculators will work.

Posted by: Tony Jeremiah | October 14, 2008 11:32 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM