Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Neurotopia

Stronger. Faster. Bloggier. Now chock full of glial goodness. **Warning** contains neuro-nuts.

Search

Profile

EVIL.jpg The Evil Monkey has a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from a southeastern U.S. university. After a postdoctoral nightmare of Inquisitorial proportions, he is currently working in a laboratory and an adjunct assistant professor at a nearby state university.


scicurious2.png Scicurious has a PhD in Physiology from a southern institution. She is a nerd, a geek, and also a dork. And yes, that really is her brain.


icon.jpgNotoriousLTP is an MD-PhD student in New York City.  After finishing (hopefully soon) his PhD in behavioral neuroscience, he will re-enter the fun vortex that is medical education.



Disclaimer: The opinions on this blog do not represent any organization to which we may belong, or employers, or basically anybody but us. So there.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll

Archives

Other Junk

Locations of visitors to this page


Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Steal This Button and Link Here!
neurobutton.png


Open_Lab_2009_editor.jpg


openlab08-winner.150.png


Open_Lab_2009_published.png


Research Blogging Awards 2010

« Key paper in depression genetics disputed | Main | In which Sci is FAMOUS! »

A Few Things

Category: Synaptic Misfires
Posted on: June 25, 2009 12:13 AM, by Scicurious

First off, how many is a "few"? I mean, I think of a "couple" as two, and a "few" as three. But what does that make five? "Some"?




Anyway, please head on over and congratulation Southern Fried Scientist for his Quark win!!! 3quarksdaily picked his post on dolphin-safe tuna for their quark award! I'm so jealous, but it's a great post and totally deserves it. The other quarks went to Daylight Atheism and Bad Astronomy, and they were both worth checking out. Clearly I need to write some better stuff before next year...I want a quark to hang on my wall...

Secondly, you should check out a post AK wrote on defining neurotransmitters. When we discuss neurotransmission, even in scientific papers, we tend to think very simplistically about it. This is something that is necessary in papers where you might have a 39,000 word limit, but it's not necessarily a good thing.




Next, I'm sure you all have heard about the Dancing Cockatoo, Snowball, who can dance to the rhythm of music (though he's got TERRIBLE taste, I mean, the Backstreet Boys?! That's so...1998...). Check out the new book about the brain, music, and language, at the official blog by Oxford University Press! There's also apparently a documentary, though I think it'll be over by now. I don't know if I support this kind of research, though. I mean, the BACKSTREET BOYS!? How did THAT pass animal welfare regulations?


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/113043

Comments

1

I also define a 'couple' to be two and a 'few' to be three...
Thanks for the links!

Posted by: angela | June 25, 2009 4:54 AM

2

I had a boss once who used "couple" to mean about 3-4, "few" to mean maybe 6 or so, and "several" to mean perhaps 10 or more.

This would get very confusing, because to me "couple" is either exactly 2, or for uncertain quantities "almost certainly 2", "few" is usually around 3 or 4, and "several" around 4-6.

Posted by: Andrew | June 25, 2009 6:35 AM

3

5 is "several"...

Posted by: Charlie B. | June 25, 2009 6:48 AM

4

"Several" is 5-7 for me. I guess I use "couple" for 2-3 and "few" for 3-4, approximately -- but I don't have a clear idea of how I use the latter two.

Posted by: Zachary | June 25, 2009 7:31 AM

5

Fifty grains of rice is a few, fifty birthday cakes is a lot. To me, it really depends on what you are talking about but I agree, a few is at least three.

Posted by: Richard Simons | June 25, 2009 9:40 AM

6

Thanks for the compliment! I'm glad you liked my post.

Posted by: WhySharksMatter | June 25, 2009 10:14 PM

7

5 is a handful, pentadactyly speaking.

Posted by: DD | July 18, 2009 8:00 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)






ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.