Wasn't it just yesterday that I wrote this post? Via Mr. Fleck, hot off the presses, a release from Senator Boxer's office:
Boxer, Bingaman and Lieberman Ask President to Commit to Working with Congress to Fight Global WarmingWednesday, November 15, 2006
Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) today sent the following letter to President George W. Bush, asking him to commit to working with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007.
The Senators are the incoming Chairs of three important Senate Committees on global warming: Boxer is the incoming Chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; Bingaman is the incoming Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee; and Lieberman is the incoming Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The Senators' letter to the President follows:
November 15, 2006
The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20510Dear Mr. President:
As you know, diplomats representing 189 countries, including the United States, are now in Nairobi, Kenya discussing the most pressing environmental issue currently facing mankind: human-induced global warming. Unfortunately, we have not been satisfied with the level of U.S. participation in the international negotiations or in reducing our own domestic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, as incoming Chairs of three important Senate Committees on global warming, we seek your commitment to work with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007. The U.S. must move quickly to adopt economy-wide constraints on domestic GHG emissions and then work with the international community to forge an effective and equitable global agreement.
Scientists are now warning that we may be reaching a "tipping point" beyond which it will be extremely difficult, or perhaps impossible, to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. If the world continues on its current path of emissions increases, we could risk global climatic disasters on an unprecedented scale, ranging from dangerous sea level rise, to increasingly damaging hurricanes (such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita), increased deaths from air pollution and disease, to widespread geo-political instability. A recent report by Sir Nicholas Stern finds that leaving climate change unchecked could cost between 5%-20% of global GDP.
As United States Senators, we have all authored or co-sponsored legislation to combat global warming. Although our approaches differ slightly, we-along with the overwhelming majority of the scientific community, agree that human caused global warming is real and that we must pass legislation to address this threat. We are committed to achieving this result.
As you know, in addition to our proposed bills, on June 22, 2005, the United States Senate went on record for the first time in bipartisan support of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases by a vote 53-44. We have good reason to believe that the number of Senators in support of such legislation is now even larger than that vote demonstrated.
The recent elections have signaled a need to change direction in many areas, including global warming. If we are to leave our children a world that resembles the earth we inherited, we must act now to address GHG emissions. When the 110th Congress begins in January, we pledge to work to pass an effective system of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases.
We urge you to work with us to reach this result and to signal to the world that global warming legislation is on the way.
Respectfully,
Senator Barbara Boxer
Senator Jeff Bingaman
Senator Joseph Lieberman
The problem for the Senate three is that the House chairmen who are needed to get anything to the President's desk are not nearly as amenable to climate change legislation. John Dingell will chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and not only is he not a noted enviro, he loves the automobile industry. If we were talking about the Japanese or Swedish or German automobile industry then it might not be an issue, but we're talking about the American automobile industry. The American automobile industry has and will do anything and everything it can to forestall even the most minor changes to the way they make cars (5 mph bumper, fuel economy, seat belts, etc....)
Kevin Vranes has a phud in Physical Ocean- ography and Cli- matology. He now studies sci- ence policy and politics at the 
Comments
# 1 | fionda | November 16, 2006 9:37 AM
Kevin, thanks for posting this. To what degree do you think Pelosi be able to pressure Dingell?
# 2 | kevin v | November 16, 2006 4:27 PM
Depends. Since the caucus elected Hoyer as majority leader it takes some of Pelosi's influence away. I don't think that she necessarily would have much influence on Dingell's committee agenda, but if she made it a big priority, she might. But then the question is, is climate change a big priority for her. She hasn't made any noises that it is. If it's only a lukewarm priority for her, than she's not going to spend her political capital on pushing the committee chairs to move on it.
# 3 | fionda | November 16, 2006 5:50 PM
Well, she did co-sponsor a bill on climate change earlier this year, for what it's worth.
# 4 | kevin v | November 16, 2006 5:59 PM
yea, I think it is worth something, but I think her agenda is going to be on 2008, which means maybe not on climate change. The topic doesn't make their "100 hours" list, so I think their major focus will be on the topics that do, like minimum wage, health care, national security, etc.: http://www.housedemocrats.gov/bigpicture/jobs_and_economy/issue.cfm?level2id=102
Boxer and Bingaman can afford to push climate change because they are in specific policy positions that have jurisdiction over the issue. But Pelosi and Reid can only afford to advance an agenda that they think will make the most impact on the 2008 elections. For Reid that may mean putting climate change on the floor calendar because his committee chairs are pushing it on him. But if Pelosi doesn't have her committee chairs knocking down that door, she probably doesn't have the incentives to ask them to. The other issues on the 100-hours list will make a much bigger difference than climate change in the next election.