Seed Media Group

No Se Nada

Science and (culture, politics, policy, media)

Search this blog

Profile

vranespic.jpg Kevin Vranes has a phud in Physical Ocean- ography and Cli- matology. He now studies sci- ence policy and politics at the CSTPR. (More in the about.)

email: kevin {/at/} nosenada.org
Comments policy

Recent Posts

required reading


  The Contested Plains
  On Killing
  The Wisdom of Crowds
  The Tipping Point
  On Combat
  The Botany of Desire
  Freakanomics
  Midnight's Children

Categories

Recent Comments

Archives

the usual suspects

(listed in semi-random order)


  prometheus (sci. pol.)
  Boulder Coffee
  john fleck (ideas)
  brian schmidt (ideas)
  andrew alden (geology)
  james annan (climate)
  realclimate (climate)
  dan collins (geo-)
  pielke sr. (climate)
  sylvia tognetti (sci. pol.)
  andrew dessler (climate)
  bob park (physics/sci pol)
  chris rowan (geology)
  charles magee (geo-)
  wg/co (geology)
  yami mcmoots (geology)
  sean davis (clouds)
  reason: hit and run (politics)
  point380 climate consulting
  colorado pols (CO politics)
  colo. confidential (CO politics)


Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Oh boy. Oh boy. It's worse than I thought. | Main | The greedy bastards go in for the kill; local hero saves the day »

It's all about the PREDICTION

Category: Culture
Posted on: January 3, 2007 11:50 AM, by Kevin Vranes

I'm still buried under snow and work, so blogging will remain slow for a while if you're worried. I'll try to trickle out some good stuff in the meantime, like this fabulous prediction by our favorite Oracle, Mr. Pat Robertson.

Mr. Robertson

predicted Tuesday that a terrorist attack on the United States would result in "mass killing" late in 2007.

"I'm not necessarily saying it's going to be nuclear," he said during his news-and-talk television show The 700 Club on the Christian Broadcasting Network. "The Lord didn't say nuclear. But I do believe it will be something like that."

Mr. Robertson said God told him during a recent prayer retreat that major cities and possibly millions of people will be affected by the attack, which should take place some time after September.

Now, is this really a prediction? Or is it a well-placed errand boy delivering a message from his superiors? The answer matters, because if it is a prediction then it implies that some quantifiable uncertainty exists on the prediction. And where does the uncertainty lie? In that Mr. Robertson might not really have a direct line to the Heavenly Father? What are the chances? Or that the line might have had some static, obscuring God's voice and so Mr. Robertson might not have heard every detail totally clearly? What are the chances? If we hit Jan. 1, 2008 without the predicted attack, is there a way that we can go back and figure out what went so horribly wrong for Mr. Robertson? Of course, the possibility exists that he's just making it all up:

The broadcaster predicted in January 2004 that U.S. President George W. Bush would easily win re-election. Mr. Bush won 51 per cent of the vote that fall, beating Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. He also predicted Bush's victory for a second term in 2005.

"I have a relatively good track record," he said. "Sometimes I miss."

In May, Mr. Robertson said God told him that storms and possibly a tsunami were to crash into America's coastline in 2006. Even though the U.S. was not hit with a tsunami, Mr. Robertson on Tuesday cited last spring's heavy rains and flooding in New England as partly fulfilling the prediction.

Predictions matter for policy makers, whether they be on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of future climate change or on the possibilities for mass death directed by an angry God. (Of course, now that God has told Mr. Robertson of the attack, it implies God's compliance in the attack, so if it does happen, instead of asking ourselves "Why do they hate us?" we should be asking ourselves, "Why does God hate us?")

Comments

# 1 | Mark P | January 3, 2007 12:41 PM

If god told me a terrorist attack would happen and kill that many people, I would ask god for a little clarification so I could try to stop it, or at least be far away when it happened. If god wouldn't clarify things, I would tell him to shut the hell up and leave me alone.

# 2 | J-Dog | January 3, 2007 1:43 PM

I bet ol' Pat will be the first to tell you that a little more money on the old collection plate will clear up a lot of that static!

IMO, there's got to be a PhD and a paper or two in finding out more about why people would donate to this scumbag.

I know our Happy SB world has been wracked by dissention lately with atheist vs. believers controversy, but doesn't the very existence of a knucklehead like Robertson end the discusssion on the side of "believers are idiots?" How can anyone with any sense contribute to theis fat little fucks purse?

Or, is Roberston all about healing? Is he the "redeemer" that we can all agree is a total turd? Inquiring Minds want to know!

# 3 | julie | January 3, 2007 11:26 PM

Robertson's predictions are transparently hateful and vindictive. Hateful and vindictive predictions are clearly the work of a man's mind, and that is why his claims are ridiculous. It is not ridiculous that there is occasionally divine clarity and legitimate prophesy. It is not ridiculous that a man pray. Do you all mean to be saying 'ha ha ha this man thinks people can interact with the divine' or are you just saying 'Robertson is a self-serving political idiot who comically phrases his hate through prophesy.' I think it is very important to make a distinction.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com