Seed Media Group

Not Exactly Rocket Science

My small attempt to celebrate science and to make it interesting and fun by giving jargon, confusion and elitism a solid beating with the stick of good writing.

Profile

Ed.jpgEd lives in London and works at Cancer Research UK. This blog is his attempt to make science interesting to everyone by beating jargon, confusion and elitism with the stick of good writing. Ed is an award-winning freelance science writer. He finds writing about himself in the third person strange and unsettling.

AddThis Feed Button

Like the blog? Buy the book! NERSBOOKicon.jpg


An interview with me

My other writing

The original site


Enough about me - tell me about you


Telegraph.jpg

Thinkingblogger.jpg

IntellectualBlogger.jpg

SunMountain.jpg


Search this blog

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

The Mini-Blog

Bric-a-brac

Nature Blog Network


View blog authority
Add to Technorati Favorites
Creative Commons License
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

My inspiration

Alice.jpg

A good moment

DavidAttenborough.jpg

Heh

Lolbachia.jpg LOLbachia

Badges

image

Blogroll


Science blogs Carnivals Other blogs Science stuff

« Crocodiles signal hatching time by calling from inside their eggs | Main | Cuttlefish learn from watching potential prey even before they are born »

Death-trap or fortress - the two web designs of black widow spiders

Category: Animal behaviourAnimalsInvertebratesPredators and preySpiders
Posted on: June 26, 2008 8:30 AM, by Ed Yong

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchI've written two news stories in this week's New Scientist. One is on the different tactics of four-year-old boys and girls as they compete for animal puppets. The other is on the webs spun by black widow spiders. The article on the venomous, evil, little critters is longer so I'm going to use this space to talk about the black widows instead...

Latrodectus-hesperus.jpg Black widows are notorious for both the toxicity of their venom and the cannibalistic nature of their sex, but their webs are equally interesting and less well known.

The basic design - the "sheet-based" web - consists of a well-defined horizontal sheet of silk supported by some overhanging threads. Underneath the sheet, the spider spins "gum-footed threads" - vertical lines of silk with blobs of sticky glue at their base. These threads are incredibly taut and if an insect blunders into them, they break off from the ground, stick to the insect and catapult it into mid-air, where it struggles helplessly. The spider senses the vibrations through the sheet and goes in for the kill.

But Jacquelyn Zevenbergen at the University of Akron found that these webs are only used by hungry spiders. Over the course of a week, she fed several small Western black widows with daily crickets while starving an equal number of big ones. The result was a hundred or so spiders, all of the same size, but half of which were very hungry.

She found that the starving spiders mostly spun sheet-based webs, and did so twice as often as the sated spiders. They opted for a different design - the "tangle-based" web. As its name implies, this structure is a chaotic, three-dimensional network of non-stick strands. It's a mess to behold - no distinctive sheet, no gumfooted threads, just a mass of silk with the spider in the middle.

Blackwidowweb.jpg

Fortress vs. fine-dining

Other spiders can change the size or shape of their webs, but the black widows go a step further, in a way that makes them unique. They change the entire architecture of the web, adding and deleting features that have specific functions. Tony Blackledge, who led the study, told me, "Their webs aren't simply more or less of the same thing."

The webs have different purposes too. When Zevenbergen let small groups of crickets loose in the spiders' enclosures, she found that the sheet webs were far deadlier traps than the tangle ones. Regardless of their own body condition, spiders that were allowed to hunt on the sheet webs spun by hungry spiders caught more crickets, and they caught them faster and more efficiently.

Partly, the sheet web's efficiency is due to the lethal gum-footed threads. The sheet also plays a role, for it acts as a better transmitter of the vibrations of struggling prey, and it allows the waiting spider great manoeuvrability.

Spider spins web controls spider

So why would a black widow choose to spin the less efficient tangle webs? The researchers offer two possible answers. The simplest one is that the tangles act like a fortress, providing the spider with better defences against predators. With their stomach full of cricket juice, they can afford to divert their resources to protection rather than predation.

But the more interesting theory is that the spiders could be using the webs to regulate their own behaviour. Zevenbergen found that even the well-fed spiders attempt to capture prey if they're placed on the sheet webs of hungry spiders and as we've already seen, they're more successful at it on these deadly constructions.

Blackledge suggests that black widows are somewhat incapable of ignoring the vibrations of struggling prey and would effectively overeat if they didn't change their web design. He says, "The tangle-based webs help to keep [them] from expressing capture behaviors when they don't need them." So black widows change the architecture of their lairs to stop themselves from overeating. It would be like me bricking up my kitchen doorway if I'm feeling fat.

Reference: ZEVENBERGEN, J., SCHNEIDER, N., BLACKLEDGE, T. (2008). Fine dining or fortress? Functional shifts in spider web architecture by the western black widow Latrodectus hesperus. Animal Behaviour DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.008

Comments

I moved into Trail BC last year and this summer I just discovered quite a few black widows living in my garden area. I'm not risking getting bitten while gardening - normally I leave spiders alone outdoors (even though I'm definitely a complete arachnophobe)but widows not a chance.

Posted by: Doug Alder | June 28, 2008 7:52 PM

Saw it in this weeks New Scientist. Interesting for sure. Are there any practical implications of the study?

Posted by: Riley Metcalfe | July 7, 2008 7:56 PM

I struggle to think of any. But that's one of the things I love about it. I have a hearty fondness for science that has no practical value whatsoever outside of its demonstration of something very, very cool.

Posted by: Ed Yong | July 7, 2008 8:15 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. I wish this were a Poe 11.23.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Not my cup of tea 11.22.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Carded! 11.23.2008 · Orac
  4. Quadrant's war on science 11.21.2008 · Tim Lambert
  5. The Marijuana Potency Data 11.21.2008 · DrugMonkey

Search All Blogs