Now on ScienceBlogs: Are testosterone-deficient men responsible for shortages of a life-saving drug for women with breast cancer?

Enter to Win

Not Exactly Rocket Science

My small attempt to celebrate science and to make it interesting and fun by giving jargon, confusion and elitism a solid beating with the stick of good writing.

Profile

Ed_Yong.jpgEd Yong is an award-winning British science writer. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to make the latest scientific discoveries interesting to everyone. He finds writing about himself in the third person strange and unsettling.

What others are saying...

"One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

"A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

"Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

"Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

Sign up

Twitter.jpg

Facebook.jpg

Feed.jpg

Book.jpg

Why I blog
An interview with me
The original site • Tell me about you: Part 1 Part 2

Creative Commons License
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

140-character ramblings

My wife, who makes it all possible

Alice.jpg

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll


Science blogs Other blogs Science stuff

Archives

« The point of sleep, or, Do fruit flies dream of six-legged sheep? | Main | The fiery taste of chillies is a defence against a fungus »

Athletes get more points by making referees see red

Category: Sports
Posted on: August 10, 2008 12:00 PM, by Ed Yong

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchFor a sportsman, sometimes pay to have the referee seeing red. In some sports, a simple red garment can give an athlete a competitive advantage because the striking hues draws the focus of the referee.  With a delightfully simple but beautifully crafted experiment, Norbert Hagemann at the University of Munster found that refs have a tendency to award more points to red-garbed competitiors.

Taekwondo.jpg Three years ago, Russell Hill and Robert Barton found that in boxing, tae kwon do and wrestling, contestants who wore red are more likely to win their bouts. They reasoned that red - the colour of anger and aggression - gives athletes who don it a psychological boost that brings victory that much closer.

An interesting idea, but a later study by Candy Rowe showed that there's nothing special about red. She found that in judo, where players wear either blue or white suits, it's blue that grants the advantage. Her theory was that white suits are brighter than the blue ones and more strongly contrasted against the background. That gives the blue competitors a edge when it comes to following and anticipating their opponents' moves.

But Hagemann rejects both ideas. His explanation has nothing to do with the players at all, and everything to do with people who don't take part but wield massive influence over the outcomes of competitive sports - the referees. They're frequently forced to make very difficult decisions under less-than-ideal conditions. Under these tough circumstances, small biases in their perceptions - like a tendency to look at the more striking colour - may come into play.

Round One - FIGHT!

To test this idea, Hagemann and colleagues chose recruited 42 seasoned referees who, between them, had over 320 years of experience at judging tae kwon do matches. The judges watched one of two sets of videos clips, showing matches between contestants who wore red or blue gear. Both sets of clips were completely identical save for one key difference - in one, the experimenters had digitally swapped the colours of the fighters' clothes.

Taekwondo2.jpgThe referees watched the matches and, following the rules of the World Taekwondo Federation, awarded their points. And when Hagemann tallied up the scores, he found that the red fighters scored on average 13% more points than the blue ones. When a blue competitor was digitally transformed into a red one, his points tended to rise but a red competitor who was turned into a blue one was awarded lower scores. Neither set of clips was given a higher total number of points.

It's a very neat result - with a bit of digital sleight-of-hand, Hagemann found that referees will assign more points to red-clothed contestants than they would to blue-clothed ones, even if their performance is exactly the same.

Dress to impress

It's unclear whether this referee bias explains Rowe's judo results, especially since she suggested that white is the more vivid colour. But Hagemann feels that it can certainly explain the Hill and Barton study where red competitors had a slight edge over white.

In their analysis, the edge bestowed by crimson hues only mattered when contestants were closely matched because only then are the referees' decisions important enough to tip the scales towards the more vivid contender. If one contestant is clearly superior, referee bias isn't going to make much of a difference even if one of the pair is wearing yellow with purple polka dots.

It's also worth noting that this referee effect only really applies to combat sports like tae kwon do and boxing where it's the ref who actively awards points. In these cases, it may be a good idea to change the rules so that red attire isn't allowed, or that referee decisions are supplemented with electronic aids.

In team  sports like football, where the referee has more of a role in regulating fair play and punishing foul moves, it's unlikely to have much effect, so Chelsea need not worry when playing Arsenal. Indeed, in sports like football, it may even be counter-productive to draw the referee's attention if your primary strategy is to dive towards the pitch in mock agony whenever another player glances in your general direction.   

Reference: Psychological Science; doi to follow

Apparently, there's a relatively important sporting event going on. To commemorate this minor gathering, here's the first of two posts to about new (rather well-timed) studies, united by the loose theme of sports and psychology. The second one's coming on Tuesday.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/78498

Comments

1

Ed, I've seen it quoted in the past that, in England at least, football teams with red in their uniform have won the Premiership or the previous Division One titles much more frequently than other teams. I guess it could be down to chance but I wouldn't completely discount it as being a factor in team sports.

Posted by: Sigmund | August 11, 2008 1:43 AM

2

In football I imagine red or other vivid colors could help because it makes it easier to spot members of your own team making it easier to pass the player in the best position. Admittedly the opposing team will also find it easier to keep track, but I think knowledge about your team mates is more important.

Posted by: Thomas | August 11, 2008 3:22 AM

3

Wouldn't it make more sense to require both competitors to wear red rather than outlaw it? I would assume that these data are suggesting not that red is advantaged, but that judging competitors dressed in blue (or what-have-you) is less accurate. It's easy to miss lighting fast kicks in Tae Kown Do- it's harder to imagine experienced judges fabricating extra kicks for red-garbed competitors.
So unless it would make it more difficult to tell them apart, make them all wear red and enhance the ability of the refs to score everyone.

Full disclaimer- my sparring gear is red.

Posted by: Becca | August 11, 2008 9:43 AM

4

Good point Becca.

Re: football - I think it's too hard to say. There are historical reasons at work too; many old clubs wore red, and old clubs also tend to be bigger, richer and more successful.

Posted by: Ed Yong | August 12, 2008 6:29 AM

5

Sigmund: What's the breakdown of team colours? Because if there are simply more teams with red in their uniform, that would explain the effect as well. ;)

Posted by: Joshua | August 13, 2008 4:14 PM

6

I bet it has more to do with the physiology of rods and cones than the psycology.

Posted by: Joseph Brenner | August 13, 2008 9:42 PM

7

Let's see...Canada's colours are red and white and as of this comment we have 0 Olympic medals. Also, my home hockey team is the Leafs who wear blue and white and they haven't won a championship since 1967. Put me down as undecided.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008 11:57 PM

8

Interesting. I personally have never seen nor experienced this. It would be interesting to see if the "experienced" judges were actually USA Taekwondo certified referees (there aren't many of us) or simply high-ranking black belts. Also interesting to see if these referees were Korean and male or mixed palette of men and women of all ages and ethnicities.

Posted by: Ana | August 10, 2009 10:31 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.