Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Not Exactly Rocket Science

My small attempt to celebrate science and to make it interesting and fun by giving jargon, confusion and elitism a solid beating with the stick of good writing.

Profile

Ed_Yong.jpg Come and visit Ed Yong’s blog Not Exactly Rocket Science in its new home at Discover Blogs.

What others are saying...

"One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

"A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

"Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

"Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

Sign up

Twitter.jpg

Facebook.jpg

Feed.jpg

Book.jpg

Why I blog
An interview with me
The original site • Tell me about you: Part 1 Part 2

Creative Commons License
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

140-character ramblings

My wife, who makes it all possible

Alice.jpg

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll


Science blogs Other blogs

« Faulty connections responsible for inherited face-blindness | Main | Clean thoughts can soften moral judgments »

Fossilised embryos are the work of bacteria

Category: BacteriaPalaeontology
Posted on: November 25, 2008 7:30 AM, by Ed Yong

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchAnimal fossils are usually the remains of hard structures - bones and shells that have been petrified through enormous pressures acting over millions of years. But not all of them had such hard beginnings. Some Chinese fossils were once the embryos of animals that lived in the early Cambrian period, some 550 million years ago. Despite having the consistency and strength of jelly, the embryos have been exceptionally well preserved and the structure of their individual cells, and even the compartments within them, have been conserved in all their beautiful, minute detail.

Fossilembryo.jpgThey are a boon to biologists. Ever since the work of Ernst Haeckel in the 19th century, comparing the development of animal embryos has been an important part of evolutionary biology. Usually, scientists have to piece together the development of ancient animals by comparing their living descendants. But the preserved embryos give the field of embryology its very own fossil record, allowing scientists to peer back in time at the earliest days of some of the earliest living things. But how did these delicate structures survive the pressures of the ages?

Elizabeth Raff from Indiana University has a plausible answer. Her experiments suggest that fossil embryos are the work of colonies of ancient bacteria, which grew over the dead clumps of cells and eventually replaced their organic matter with minerals. They are mere casts of the original embryos.

Under a range of different conditions, Raff watched decaying sea urchin embryos (which are roughly similar to the fossil ones in both size and shape. Under normal conditions, she saw that dead embryonic cells destroy themselves within a matter of hours, through the actions of their own enzymes. To produce fossil embryos, this self-destruction is the first hurdle to clear and Raff found that it can be done quite simply by placing the embryos in oxygen-less environments.

When the fossilised embryos first died several million years ago, they must have sank into oxygen-deprived mud, which staved off the embryos' destruction long enough for bacteria living on their surface to take hold. Raff found that dead sea urchin embryos are rapidly colonised by bacteria that form three-dimensional communities called biofilms. They construct these communities using the embryo's own structures as scaffolding and the bacteria replicate the structures of the cells they consume, right down to the smallest feature.

Indeed, the fossil embryos still bear traces of these ancient bacteria. They have long, thread-like imprints that strongly resemble the shapes made by bacterial groups growing over sea urchin embryos in oxygen-less water. These biofilms stimulated the growth of minerals and Raff saw that needle-shaped crystals start forming around the bacteria within a week after the embryo's death.

The crystals are mainly made of aragonite, a type of calcium carbonate typically found in the shells of molluscs and hard enough to withstand the pressures of time. By decaying the embryos, the bacteria lower the pH of the surrounding water, which creates the right conditions for the growth of these crystals.

Raff's experiments with living embryos don't by any means give certain answers about the origins of the fossil embryos, but they do at least provide a plausible origin story. Indeed, the degree of degradation in her sea urchin embryos mirrors that seen in the fossils - in some, little but the outer layer was preserved but in others, even the inner workings were sealed in glorious detail (even though the multiple steps put a question mark over the accuracy of the final structures).

The study suggests that the beautiful fossil embryos are not in fact preserved versions of the original cells, but uncanny facsimiles created by bacteria. They may have been created through a two-step process, where each layer acted as a base for sculpting the next one - animal to bacterial, and bacterial to mineral.

Reference: E. C. Raff, K. L. Schollaert, D. E. Nelson, P. C. J. Donoghue, C.-W. Thomas, F. R. Turner, B. D. Stein, X. Dong, S. Bengtson, T. Huldtgren, M. Stampanoni, Y. Chongyu, R. A. Raff (2008). Embryo fossilization is a biological process mediated by microbial biofilms Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (49), 19360-19365 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810106105

Subscribe to the feed

Bookbanner.jpg

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

Comments

1

What's that saying, if Noah's Ark actually existed, it would 99 percent bacteria. But twice as much room because no need to bring two of each.

Posted by: Robert V Sobczak | November 25, 2008 11:34 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.