Not Exactly Rocket Science

This is the seventh of eight posts on evolutionary research to celebrate Darwin’s bicentennial. It combines many of my favourite topics – symbiosis, horizontal gene transfer, parasitic wasps and viruses.

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchParasitic wasps make a living by snatching the bodies of other insects and using them as living incubators for their grubs. Some species target caterpillars, and subdue them with a biological weapon. They inject the victim with “virus-like particles” called polydnaviruses (PDVs), which weaken its immune system and leave the wasp grub to develop unopposed. Without the infection, the wasp egg would be surrounded by blood cells and killed.

i-660a09c690d28a41bdc91d0c247ff2d1-Cotesiawasp.jpgThe wasps’ partners in body-snatching are very different to all other viruses. Once they have infected other cells, they never use the opportunity to make more copies of themselves. They actually can’t. To complete their life cycles, viruses need to package their genetic material within a coat made of proteins. In most cases, the instructions for building these coats are encoded within the virus’s genome, but polydnaviruses lack these key instructions entirely. Without them, the virus is stuck within whatever cell it infects.

It’s such a weird set-up that some scientists have questioned whether the polydnaviruses actually count as viruses at all or whether they are “genetic secretions” from the wasps themselves. Where on earth are those missing coat genes?

Annie Bezier form Francois Rabelais University has found the answer and it’s an astonishing one. The viruses’ coat genes haven’t disappeared – they’ve just been relocated to the genomes of their wasp hosts.

In this way, the wasps and the viruses have formed an unbreakable alliance, where neither can survive without the other’s help. Without the virus, the next generation of wasps would be overwhelmed by the defences of their caterpillar larders. Without the wasp, the virus would never be able to reproduce. Some viruses may be able to live happily alongside their host with little ill effect; others may even be beneficial in some way. But this is the first example of a virus co-evolving with its host in a compulsory binding pact.


Secret origins

The polydnaviruses were first observed in 1967 within the ovaries of parasitic wasps. From this storage facility, these biological weapons can be easily injected into a host, for the wasp’s sting is just a modified version of her egg-laying tube. Bezier knew that when the viruses are first produced in the wasp ovaries, they come complete with coats, so the genes for building these must lie nearby.

She searched for virus-related genes that were switched on in the ovaries of two parasitic wasps from the braconid group – Cotesia congregata and Chelonus inanitus. It wasn’t long before she found some – 22 potential genes that strongly resembled genes from another group of viruses called nudiviruses. Sure enough, some of these 22 genes encode proteins that form viral coats, and others encoded proteins responsible for assembling the virus particles together. These initial results strongly implied that the polydnaviruses are descendants of the nudivirus family .

Nudiviruses infect insects, so Bezier needed to make sure that the genes she was picking up hadn’t just come from an infection that her wasps had picked up in her laboratory. Fortunately for her theory, she managed to find some of the same genes in eight species of braconid wasp collected from all over the world. And when she sequenced large tracts of C.congregata‘s genome, she found that at least 10 nudivirus-related genes had been fully integrated into the insect’s chromosomes. These were no temporary hitchhikers – they were clearly stable parts of the wasp’s genome.

Bezier went on to show that these nudivirus-related genes, hidden among the wasp genomes, were switched on when the adult wasps were still tucked away in their pupae. That’s exactly the time when the polydnaviruses are first assembled. The genes are even switched on the exact spot in the wasp ovaries where the virus particles are produced. And to top it all off, Bezier found that 20 of these ex-nudiviral genes encoded proteins that make up part of the polydnavirus coat. It was the final proof she needed. The wasp genomes clearly contain ex-viral genes, which complete the assembly process that polydnaviruses can’t finish themselves.

i-6b26b52a27ba33acafb92f05c7cded2b-Viruses.jpg

Evolution of a partnership

The two wasps that Bezier studied hail from distantly related arms of the braconid family tree, which suggests that all the wasps of this group have nudiviral machinery incorporated into their genomes. Bezier thinks that the bond between wasp and virus was forged at least 100 million years ago, before the braconid wasp lineage had started to expand.

The genetic evidence suggests all the virus genes in today’s wasps are the descendants of a single ancestral nudivirus that integrated itself into the genomes of an ancestral wasp. Many of these transferred genes are still incredibly similar across different species, suggesting that some aspects of the wasp-virus union are so important that they are resistant to change. Others have diverged more thoroughly and Bezier thinks that these are probably responsible for more specific interactions between virus and host.

In contrast, the polydnaviruses actually share very little of their own DNA. As an example, the strains used by C.congregata and C.inanitus hardly have any genes in common, even though their respective wasps use very similar coat-producing genes. Bezier thinks that many of the genes within the polydnaviruses aren’t viral at all – they actually came from the wasp.

When the ancestral nudivirus infected the ancestral wasp, the two partners did a massive genetic swap, with wasp genes replacing viral ones and viral genes infiltrating the wasp genome. The virus has become a vehicle that allows the wasp to switch on its own genes within the body of a caterpillar. It’s possible that this partnership was one of the reasons why the braconid wasps became such successful parasites and why today, there are at least 17,500 species of them.

Reference: Science 10.1126/science.1166788

Images: Photo by Alex Wild

More on parasitic wasps:

More on horizontal gene transfer:

Subscribe to the feed

i-5b4148252bd99d05e9ffe49a70c5ebe3-Bookbanner4.jpg

Comments

  1. #1 jj
    February 12, 2009

    Interesting post! I always like to look at discoveries like these in a backwards fashion – Like, instead of thinking about how these wasps ‘took’ genes from a virus, but more how something like a wasp developing proteins like this, then spreading them to a host could result in the formation of a virus (of course I have no backing to this whats-so-ever, but it’s interesting to think of it this way). Or what if a wasp infected another wasp (which doesn’t happen, at leased not that I know of) with a pseudo-virus, and that is able to ‘absorb’ (for lack of a better term or mechanism) a protein coat gene – creating a virus that is able to replicate. I’m sure there is much more evidence for the forward progression, but something like this could help explain how something like a virus could come to be.

  2. #2 Nathan Myers
    February 12, 2009

    This provokes the question as to where and how viruses originated. Might this be not a case of genes migrating from viruses to wasps, but rather a case of genes failing to migrate from wasps to polydnaviruses? If that is not plausible (for some specific reason) in this case, is there any reason it can’t be in some more likely case, e.g. an archaeon or bacterium?

    I am thinking, particularly, of bacteriophages, which seem to me more likely to have been hijacked by viruses than to have been invented by them. Parasites are generally better known for a tendency to degeneracy than for exquisite mechanical engineering. Has anyone even looked for instances of a bacterium using the phage structure as a carrier for communication or as a weapons delivery platform? Might not the phage virus qua virus itself originate as a weapon in inter-bacterial warfare?

    The idea seems testable by identifying patterns of phage components in bacterial genomes.

  3. #3 ERV
    February 12, 2009

    AHHH COOOOOOOOOOOL!!!

  4. #4 magetoo
    February 13, 2009

    What ERV said.

  5. #5 John
    February 15, 2009

    Another cool narration by Ed.

  6. #6 Larry Ayers
    February 17, 2009

    I’d much rather read posts like this rather than pointless battles between theists and atheists. Go Ed!

  7. #7 Dallas
    February 20, 2009

    Wow. This is one of the coolest examples of horizontal gene transfer I’ve heard about. Thanks for posting this.

  8. #8 aratina
    February 20, 2009

    Stunning! This could make for an awesome sci-fi story.

  9. #9 James
    June 11, 2009

    Cyberworld is full of indecipherable sci-pseudo-jargon that is not very well written. I would like to thank you for inspiring me to be a better writer in terms of clarity and lucidity; for your ability to express complex subjects in a manner that makes it easy to understand is exemplary. You should be a spokesperson for the World Health Organization.