Now on ScienceBlogs: The 1/6th People

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Not Exactly Rocket Science

My small attempt to celebrate science and to make it interesting and fun by giving jargon, confusion and elitism a solid beating with the stick of good writing.

Profile

Ed_Yong.jpgEd Yong is an award-winning science writer based in London. Not Exactly Rocket Science is his attempt to make the latest scientific discoveries interesting to everyone by beating jargon, confusion and elitism with the stick of good writing. He finds writing about himself in the third person strange and unsettling.

"One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times
"A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers


• Like the blog? Buy the book!

Follow me on Twitter

Why I blog

An interview with me

The original site

• Tell me about you: Part 1 Part 2


Subscribe
NERSBOOKicon.jpg

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll


Science blogs Other blogs Science stuff

Bric-a-brac


Creative Commons License
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

Telegraph.jpg

Thinkingblogger.jpg

IntellectualBlogger.jpg

SunMountain.jpg


My inspiration

Alice.jpg

« Power lines disrupt the magnetic alignment of cows and deer | Main | Tianyulong - a fuzzy dinosaur that makes the origin of feathers fuzzier »

What the stomach contents of sperm whales tell us about giant squid and octopuses

Category: AnimalsCephalopodsInvertebrates
Posted on: March 17, 2009 8:00 PM, by Ed Yong

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchThe giant cephalopods (squids and octopuses) of the deep sea have captured the imagination for centuries. But despite our fascination with these creatures, they are still enigmas, their behaviour illuminated only by the occasional lucky video or the presence of scars on animals they fight with. For many species, including the famous giant squid, we still know relatively little about what they eat and what position they occupy in their ecosystems.

Yves Cherel from the Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chize has some new answers about the behaviour of deep-sea cephalopods and they came from a most unorthodox technique- he studied remains recovered from the stomachs of dead sperm whales.

It's clear that sperm whales feed on squid and octopuses. Sucker-shaped scars along the backs of some individuals have led people to picture titanic battles between the whales and their giant prey. Once eaten, the cephalopods' soft bodies are easily digested, but they also have hard, parrot-like beaks that aren't easily broken down.

By looking in the stomachs of three sperm whales stranded in the Bay of Biscay, Cherel recovered hundreds of beaks from 19 separate species - 17 squids including the giant squid, the seven-arm octopus (the largest in the world) and the bizarre vampire squid. Together, these species represent a decent spread of the full diversity of deep-sea cephalopods.

Giant_squid.jpg

He analysed the chemical composition of the beaks. and in particular, their ratio of carbon isotopes (carbon-13 compared to carbon-13) and their ratio of ratio of nitrogen isotopes (nitrogen-15 compared to nitrogen-14). These measurements are a reflection of both what and where the animals ate.

Levels of carbon-13 can tell us how deep an animal lives, whether it swims offshore or inshore, and whether it spends its time in the open ocean, or sticks close to its floor. All of the cephalopods' carbon-13 levels fell within a narrow range, indicating that all 19 species live in similar and overlapping parts of the ocean.

The giant squid proved to be the deepest dweller of the lot and in general, the largest squids lived closest to the ocean floor. Other studies have found that the larger these animals get, the deeper they live, suggesting that deep-living is part of the ageing process. It's possible that the older animals sink deeper to exploit the rich sources of food hugging the bottom of the ocean.

Taningia_danae_hunting.jpgNitrogen-15 is more common in eaters than in the eaten, which means that levels of this isotope are a good indicator of an animal's position in the food chain. All of the cephalopods were clearly important predators, with even the lowest ones occupying the same positions in the food chain as dolphins. But Cherel found that among them, the ruling species was the confusingly named Dana octopus squid (Taningia danae). This squid's levels of nitrogen-15 were similar to those of the sperm whales that ate it, showing that it too is a major predator that shares a position in the food web alongside other "megacarnivores".

Four years ago, Japanese researchers led by Tsunemi Kubodera captured the first ever videos of T.danae in its natural habitat. The amazing footage showed that the squid accompanies its attacks with blinding flashes of light emitted from organs in its arms. The film suggested that the squid is an aggressive and tenacious predator, rather than a sluggish and inactive animal. Cherel's analysis of their beaks supports this portrait.

The larger cephalopods weren't necessarily the top predators, and Cherel found that even very large species like the Grimaldi scaled squid had relatively low levels of nitrogen-15. Neither of the two giant species - the seven-arm octopus or the giant squid - reached the top predator position occupied by some of their relatives and even smaller, more fragile species like Chiroteuthis were similarly ranked.

Cherel's results shed some light on the cephalopods' place within their habitats, but they also show how so many species can co-exist - they either inhabit different regions or feed on different prey. Consider, for example, the two biggest specimens, the giant squid and the seven-arm octopus. The former lives in far deeper waters than the larger and feeds on prey higher up in the food chain.

In some ways, eaten beaks only provide a superficial glimpse into the lives of deep-sea cephalopods. Nonetheless, they remain one of our only tools for understanding more about these elusive animals and Cherel believes that they have only begun to yield their secrets.  Analysing levels of trace elements in the beaks could tell us more about the specific habitats that these animals live in, beyond simply the depths they frequent. And analysing the chemical composition of the beaks at different points in their growth could tell us how an individual animal's habits and diet change as it ages.

Reference: Biology Letters doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0024

More on cephalopods:

Subscribe to the feed

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/103213

Comments

1

That they are tasty. ;-)

Posted by: Russell | March 17, 2009 11:30 PM

2

Actually, a lot of the deep-sea squid are heavily ammoniated...

I attended the public seminars on deep-sea squid that accompanied the preservation and examination of the colossal squid specimen here at Te Papa and was lucky enough to see the videos of T. danae... absolutely amazing how fast and powerful they are

Posted by: wazza | March 18, 2009 1:10 AM

3

Here's another video of Taningia danae:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_AZyrH_0z8


Posted by: Paulino | March 18, 2009 2:43 PM

4

Amazing how much can be learned from beaks.

Posted by: Lilian Nattel | March 18, 2009 5:56 PM

5

Can you give a reference (URL) that will explain why N-15 tells us where in the food chain an organism is? Thanks.

Posted by: Sweetwater Tom | March 18, 2009 7:44 PM

6

Those squid are so cool. Thanks Ed.

Sweetwater, I can't think of any specific references off the top of my head that explain how/why it works but there was something about this published in Nature a few years ago. Anyway, it has been a hot technique for a while now. Search for stable isotope analysis. Here is a cool paper that came out of my neck of the woods.

Posted by: MattK | March 18, 2009 8:45 PM

7

Cool article, Ed. Thanks.

"carbon-13 compared to carbon-13" though? Is this a typo or is my ignorance showing?

Posted by: Daddy Stegosaurus | March 18, 2009 10:21 PM

8
... a most unorthodox technique- he studied remains recovered from the stomachs of dead sperm whales.
Wait a minute. Everything I've previously read stated or implied that giant cephalopods were so hard to catch and so hard to study in their natural environment, that study of remains recovered from the stomachs of dead sperm whales was the orthodox technique. What gives? Did giant cephalopods suddenly become plentiful and easy to observe?

Posted by: llewelly | March 20, 2009 9:23 AM

9

I just want to be first and welcome our Deep Sea Giant Cephalopods leaders!

Posted by: Christopher Guerra | November 4, 2009 2:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM