Not Exactly Rocket Science

Telling the difference between a German and French speaker isn’t difficult. But you may be more surprised to know that you could have a good stab at distinguishing between German and French babies based on their cries. The bawls of French newborns tend to have a rising melody, with higher frequencies becoming more prominent as the cry progresses. German newborns tend to cry with a falling melody.

i-2fdbd71594d27f6ec1f26376e0316554-Newborn-baby.jpgThese differences are apparent just three days out of the womb. This suggests that they pick up elements of their parents’ language before they’re even born, and certainly before they start to babble themselves.

Birgit Mampe from the University of Wurzburg analysed the cries of 30 French newborns and 30 German ones, all born to monolingual families. She found that the average German cry reaches its maximum pitch and intensity at around 0.45 seconds, while French cries do so later, at around 0.6 seconds.

These differences match the melodic qualities of each respective language. Many French words and phrases have a rising pitch towards the end, capped only by a falling pitch at the very end. German more often shows the opposite trend – a falling pitch towards the end of a word or phrase.

i-8ca1993941d67839fae8ae12e8f09307-French_german.jpg

These differences in “melody contours” become apparent as soon as infants start making sounds of their own. While Mampe can’t rule out the possibility that the infants learned about the sounds of their native tongue the few days following their birth, she thinks it’s more likely that they start tuning into the own language in the womb.

In some ways, this isn’t surprising. Features like melody, rhythm and intensity (collectively known as prosody) travel well across the wall of the stomach and they reach the womb with minimum disruption. We know that infants are very sensitive to prosodic features well before they start speaking themselves, which helps them learn their own mother tongue.

But this learning process starts as early as the third trimester. We know this because newborns prefer the sound of their mother’s voice compared to those of strangers. And when their mums speak to them in the saccharine “motherese”, they can suss out the emotional content of those words through analysing their melody.

Mampe’s data show that not only can infants sense the qualities of their native tongue, they can also imitate them in their first days of life. Previously, studies have found that babies can imitate the vowel sounds of adults only after 12 weeks of life, but clearly other features like pitch can be imitated much earlier. They’re helped by the fact that crying only requires them to coordinate their breathing and vocal cord movements, while making speech sounds requires far more complex feats of muscular gymnastics that are only possible after a few months. 

Reference: Current Biology doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064

More on child development: 

 


i-77217d2c5311c2be408065c3c076b83e-Twitter.jpg
i-3a7f588680ea1320f197adb2d285d99f-RSS.jpg

Comments

  1. #1 Rob Jase
    November 5, 2009

    I’m rather surprised that German babies cry, I’d have thought they’d just order their parents to feed/change/whatever them.

  2. #2 Lilian Nattel
    November 5, 2009

    Amazing. And I’d read that babies babbling (bababa gagaga etc) is undifferentiated until 9 mo or so. Hmmm.

  3. #3 Briana
    November 6, 2009

    That is what I’ve read, but perhaps its talking about the vowel sounds they make, not the melody of their voice.

    I wonder too if the age at which children start to develop language is getting shorter in countries where so much emphasis is on it… television is constant speech and noise, cities are full of people all talking, toys that talk to babies, etc. In places where the pace of life is slower, I wonder if language mimicry/comprehension develops later… also if the ability for babies to learn language so quickly was the same 100 years ago in France and Germany.

  4. #4 Adrian Morgan
    November 6, 2009

    There has been some scepticism expressed about this story. See:
    (1) http://phonetic-blog.blogspot.com/2009/11/neonate-intonation.html
    (2) http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1869

  5. #5 stripey_cat
    November 8, 2009

    Briana, I’d suspect that in a lot of “slower pace of life” environments, you still get plenty of singing (there are plenty of traditional women’s chores that have associated songs or chants) and talking (potentially to herself or to her work) that the child will hear in utero. Where you might get frantic silence is in desperately hard-working environments – industrial revolution factories would not have been conducive to casual chat, and modern maternity leave can often isolate a woman from her peers.