Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Not Exactly Rocket Science

My small attempt to celebrate science and to make it interesting and fun by giving jargon, confusion and elitism a solid beating with the stick of good writing.

Profile

Ed_Yong.jpg Come and visit Ed Yong’s blog Not Exactly Rocket Science in its new home at Discover Blogs.

What others are saying...

"One of the best sites for in-depth analysis of interesting scientific papers" - The Times

"A consistently illuminating home for long, thoughtful, and thorough explorations of science news" - National Association of Science Writers

"Ed Yong... is made of pure unobtanium and rides TWO Toruks." - Frank Swain

"Ed Yong is better than chocolate, fairy lights, and kittens chasing yarn. That is all." - Christine Ottery

Sign up

Twitter.jpg

Facebook.jpg

Feed.jpg

Book.jpg

Why I blog
An interview with me
The original site • Tell me about you: Part 1 Part 2

Creative Commons License
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

140-character ramblings

My wife, who makes it all possible

Alice.jpg

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll


Science blogs Other blogs

« Cooperating bacteria are vulnerable to slackers | Main | Elephants and humans evolved similar solutions to problems of gas-guzzling brains »

Some housekeeping

Posted on: November 15, 2009 6:13 PM, by Ed Yong

Hi folks,

A couple of housekeeping issues:

  • ScienceBlogs have developed a set of funky widgets that allow you to share the headlines from your favourite blogs on other websites. You can find the one for Not Exactly Rocket Science here - just click Share, and then Install outside Netvibes.
  • The deadline is looming for this year's Open Laboratory compilation of the science blogosphere's best offerings. If any posts in this blog have tickled your fancy, stretched your brain or stoked your loins (heaven forbid, but there are some strange people on the internet), submit them for consideration here. For full disclosure purposes, I am helping to judge this year's competition, but I will obviously not be judging my own work except in a non-competition, self-critical, tortured-soul, writery sort of way.
  • Recently, due to overwhelming demand (n=2), I've changed the way that posts appear so that the full shebang appears above the fold rather than teasing readers and making you click for the payoff. It makes the front page a bit messier, but I'm told this is easier for people reading on phones. There hasn't been a noticeable drop in traffic. Is everyone happy with this change, are you for some reason against it, or have you actually failed to notice any difference whatsoever?

E


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

Hey Ed,

I did notice that your posts now appear in full and I think it's great as I read your posts using my RSS reader, and now on my phone too, so having the whole article makes life easier!!!! (and it means I read the whole thing rather than click only when i'm interested)

Thanks! and keep up the good work (I will nominate an article when I figure out which one I like best)

Chia

Posted by: chia | November 15, 2009 7:31 PM

2

I read the posts on the RSS reader (Google Reader) and I like the change too.

Posted by: Fa | November 15, 2009 8:47 PM

3

Works for me. I think I'll like it even better yet on my office machine, which is cranky and slow.

Posted by: cicely | November 15, 2009 9:41 PM

4

Yeah the whole showing the entire post is awesome. I had always wished you would do that.

BTW, "stoked your loins (heaven forbid, but there are some strange people on the internet)" LOL

Posted by: Matt | November 15, 2009 11:37 PM

5

I read your posts through an RSS aggregator, so having the whole thing in the feed saves me a click (and the time to load the page). So yes, I like it.

Posted by: arensb | November 16, 2009 1:12 AM

6

The full article method is much easier for me when I read on my iPhone. The articles remain well-written and interesting.

Posted by: OftenWrongTed | November 16, 2009 10:22 AM

7

I use google reader, too, and find the changed format easier.

Posted by: Lilian Nattel | November 16, 2009 10:30 AM

8

I'm on high-speed, use Firefox, and it doesn't take long to load the new page. But I still prefer this format where I don't have to click to a new page. Thanks.

Posted by: Daniel J. Andrews | November 16, 2009 7:01 PM

9

What Daniel J. Andrews said. Wish other bloggers would do the same (*cough*gregladen*cough*).

Posted by: Diane G. | November 18, 2009 9:49 PM

10

For what it's worth, I prefer the teaser + click type layout. I visit the site ("manually" ...), and only every few days, so scrolling through the new posts and opening the interesting ones in separate tabs is more natural to me. Plus it feels like it loads faster that way, although that could just be my imagination.

I can live with the additional scrolling though.

Posted by: magetoo | November 20, 2009 11:50 AM

11

If you aren't noticing a drop in traffic, it may be because people that read your articles via RSS are more likely to forward it to friends if they can read the whole thing. Or, like me, they may open the article page in a new tab to remember to do something with it. ...and many other possibilities.

Posted by: Ted | November 22, 2009 10:37 PM

12

Thanks for turning away from the teaser-link. I much prefer having the entire entry right there in plain sight.

Posted by: Joy | November 24, 2009 6:07 PM

13

I like the new format too - I thought there was something different! Much easier to read, and I still click through so I can read the comments :)

Posted by: Captain Skellett | November 25, 2009 6:15 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.