Not Exactly Rocket Science

i-1d02cd7080f897f83f2280f0f44810ae-Sanajed+dinosaur.jpg

Snakes have been around for nearly 100 million years and scientists have found many fossils of extinct species. But this astonishing specimen is different. This serpent is Sanajeh indicus. It is sitting in a dinosaur nest and its coils surround three eggs and the body of a hatchling.

There are many reasons to think that this prehistoric tableau represented a predator caught in the act of hunting, rather than a mash-up of unconnected players thrown together by chance. The snake is perfectly posed, with its head resting atop a coil and its body encircling a crushed egg. All the pieces are very well preserved and very little of the snake, the dinosaur or the crushed egg have been deformed. All of this suggests that the animals were caught unawares and quickly buried in sediment.

The hatchling in question is a baby sauropod part of the dinosaur lineage that included the largest land animals of all time. It was probably a titanosaur, and being in India, that narrows things down to two known species – Isisaurus and Jainosaurus. The adults were formidable animals, 20-25 metres in length and protected by bony armour running down their backs. But even the largest dinosaurs must have hatched out of a small egg, and at that point, they were vulnerable. The hatchling that Sanajeh was about to dispatch was just 50 centimetres long, while the snake itself was measured 3.5 metres.

Despite this size discrepancy, the hatchling would still have been a substantial mouthful. Most modern snakes wouldn’t have any problem with that. Their lower jaws can unhinge to give them a massive gape and their flexible skulls are made of bones that can move against each other.

Sanajeh was halfway towards developing these specialisations. It didn’t have the fixed skulls and narrow gapes of the most primitive of modern snakes, nor could its maw open quite as wide as today’s record-breakers. Nonetheless, it could certainly swallow a sauropod infant and that ability earned Sanajeh inidcus its name. The words are Sanskrit for “ancient gape from the Indus”.

i-7b6ab87abdd645a6814b45e83240bdcf-Sanajeh.jpg

Sanajeh dates back to 67 million years ago but even after its bones were unearthed, it still took 26 years to reach the public eye. Dhananjay Mohabey first dug up the incredible specimen in 1984, near the Indian village of Dholi Dungri. He correctly identified the dinosaur baby and the remains of its egg but thought nothing more of it. The specimen’s true nature only became clear 17 years later, when Jeffrey A. Wilson from the University of Michigan visited Mohabey and re-examined the specimen. To his amazement, he spotted the distinctive backbones of a serpent, intertwined around the baby.

Peering through the Geological Society of India’s archives, the duo found a second block that had been collected at the same time but never been described. It snapped onto the first like pieces of a jigsaw, completing the loop of the snake’s coils around the crushed dinosaur egg. Even then, it took years of negotiations with the Government of India Ministry of Mines before Sanajeh could be taken to Michigan for careful preparation and study, and before the Mohabey and Wilson could return to the original dig site to find more specimens.

They did eventually find two Sanajeh individuals at the same site, both associated with sauropod clutches. This suggests that their original drama wasn’t a one-off production. At least in this area, this snake seems to have made a habit of feasting on would-be giants.

Perhaps the snakes are drawn to the nests by the presence of newly-hatched infants. After all, it’s one of the few moments when they would actually dwarf their prey, a size advantage that would disappear within months. Alternatively, Wilson suggests that Sanajeh may even have deliberately crushed the egg to free the meal within. Today, the Mexican burrowing snake (Loxocemus bicolor) certainly sets a precedent for this – it breaks the eggs of Olive Ridley turtles before eating the contents.

Reference: Wilson, J., Mohabey, D., Peters, S., & Head, J. (2010). Predation upon Hatchling Dinosaurs by a New Snake from the Late Cretaceous of India PLoS Biology, 8 (3) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000322

Model by Tyler Keillor and photographed by Ximena Erickson

More on snakes:

i-77217d2c5311c2be408065c3c076b83e-Twitter.jpg&nbspi-988017b08cce458f49765389f9af0675-Facebook.jpg&nbspi-6f3b46114afd5e1e9660f1f502bf6836-Feed.jpg&nbspi-deec675bab6f2b978e687ca6294b41a5-Book.jpg


Comments

  1. #1 southlakesmom
    March 1, 2010

    I wonder what event might have occurred that would have caused them to be frozen in time this way. Amazing! Thanks Ed for reporting on it.

  2. #2 John Scanlon FCD
    March 1, 2010

    This link should work; the paper is up, even of the DOI isn’t.

  3. #3 Guerra
    March 1, 2010

    Maybe a flash flood or a land slide.

  4. #4 Briana
    March 1, 2010

    Just want to say, that is so friggin cool. I love it when nature hits the pause button for us until we we’re here to see the show.

  5. #5 Nathan Myers
    March 2, 2010

    So, they found another S. indicus buried in the same landslide? Maybe the real news here is that they hunted in packs.

  6. #6 draco
    March 2, 2010

    Impressive but this snake can’t compare to a Titanaboa who was way bigger and scarier.

  7. #7 IanW
    March 2, 2010

    Naw, this is all wrong, Ed! This is evolution in action: clearly the snake has given birth to the dinos…!

  8. #8 darwinsdog
    March 2, 2010

    A snake eatin’ an egg. Whaddya know!

    An old man told me the following story when I was a kid. He swore that it was true:

    A black rat snake crawled into a manger in the barn, where a hen had made a nest and laid a clutch of eggs, swallowed an egg, then proceeded to crawl thru a knothole in a partition between stalls, where it found another hen’s nest and swallowed a second egg. The bulges were on either side of the partition so the snake could proceed neither forward or back out. They found the snake stuck there like that. Truth or fiction?

  9. #9 Gunnar
    March 2, 2010

    Isisaurus and Jainosaurus are both genera, not species. In addition, I find it hard to believe that titanosaur diversity has been sufficiently explored to make an identification based on geography. In the actual article, the authors only identify the eggs; rather than the sauropod hatchling itself.