Now on ScienceBlogs: That Which I Sowed in Tears, I Now Reap in Joy: A Love Letter to my Beautiful Readers

Seed Media Group

Omni Brain

An exploration of the serious/fun/ridiculous - past/present/future of the brain and the science that loves it.

The Homunculus

steve_icon_medium.jpgThe Omnibrain is a psychology graduate student at an online university. He hopes that the three weeks and $29.95 that he is spending on his Ph.D. will get him a job at a Tier 1 research university. Do online universities have postdocs? Ok...just kidding, The Omnibrain is a real graduate student at a real school somewhere in the continental United States - or maybe Europe.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Bloggers' Rights at EFF

Channel N

Openlab 2007

Glial Cells

Access Omni Brain mobile here.

Access Omni Brain email here.

Axons

« Academic Haiku Contest | Main | Win the book, God: a Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist »

Textbook warning stickers

Category: AcademiaCulture WarsHumorPolicy & Politics
Posted on: February 18, 2007 10:57 AM, by The Omnibrain

Here are a couple of my favorites starting with the original really really stupid text.
evolution_sticker1.jpgevolution_sticker2.jpgevolution_sticker3.jpgevolution_sticker4.jpgevolution_sticker5.jpg
Check out the original site for many more, as well as some good commentary.
Via BoingBoing & Digg.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/33618

Comments

1

This is a joke, yes? Those stickers aren't put on textbooks are they? Please tell me it's a joke.

Posted by: Rosemary | February 18, 2007 12:16 PM

2

The first one is not a joke - the rest are though!

Posted by: steve | February 18, 2007 12:21 PM

3

I'm in favour of this. REALITY should be marked "This should be studied with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered." That's the point of science education, no?

Posted by: Alex | February 19, 2007 6:44 AM

4

You can tell creationism isn't science. Otherwise they wouldn't have to claim that evolution is a "theory, not a fact".

I propose a slightly different wording:
"This text contains material that is established by scientific testing as by far the most likely explanation for living things.

There are other ideas of how living things came into being, but since they cannot be tested by any scientific method without failing, nor without violating the separation of church and state, we don't dare actually mention them by name on this sticker.

But you should consider these scientifically unsound explanations with an open mind."

Posted by: Metro | February 21, 2007 12:08 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM